By: Newt Gingrich
Reader Comments
Cammy
May 15, 2009
This article is false, slanderous, and dangerous. The author is either clearly bias, or just did not do his research. Oh wait it's Newt Gingrich, HE doesn't need to do research.
McL2016
May 15, 2009
*Let's* get an editor!
fairfaxresident
May 15, 2009
I live in Fairfax County Virginia. I'm not afraid of these men.
Michilines
May 15, 2009
I'm pretty confidant the old Newt didn't know anything about Uighurs until very recently, and so since they are new to him, he assumes they are new to his readers, too. That's what allows him to lie about them and their circumstances, and to smear the people who are defending them and offering to help them. Gingrich is a small, petty man. He'll do anything to sell a book or make some money. Pathetic.
Michilines
May 15, 2009
I'm pretty confidant the old Newt didn't know anything about Uighurs until very recently, and so since they are new to him, he assumes they are new to his readers, too. That's what allows him to lie about them and their circumstances, and to smear the people who are defending them and offering to help them. Gingrich is a small, petty man. He'll do anything to sell a book or make some money. Pathetic.
The Truth
May 15, 2009
cammy, i didn't know that the truth would hurt you so much that you would get angry.Where is your anger at Comrade Pelosi? Right, thats what I thought HYPOCRYT. Gitmo trials canceled then there on again.release the photos oh wait a minute don't release them.I see a John Kerry impersonator known as Flip Flop. Dangerous? Did you read the story?Is this another Slick Willy "what is the meaning of is?The Dems are Done.
The facts Mich
May 15, 2009
You make accusations & personal attacks but give NO FACTS to back up your thesis.I forgot that the party of defeat does not believe in facts just ask Pelosi or Murtha.
Michilines
May 15, 2009
There is a community if Uighurs will to take in their own from Gitmo. The Uighurs were turned in for bounties. They can't be returned to China because they would be persecuted and most likely killed. All of the accused, whether in Gitmo or in a regular U.S. jail, should get a defense. That Newt tries to smear the president by saying that Holder's firm has represented those at Gitmo is slanderous. Are all criminal defense attorneys criminals? No. Does Newt think he can get a leg up on a run for president in 2012 or sell a book by having someone write these lies? You betcha.
d1
May 16, 2009
For a fantastic response to Gingrich's lies: http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2009/05/the-uighurs-1.html
Beijing Translator
May 16, 2009
The assertion that the Uyghurs in Guantanamo Bay are affiliated with Al Qaeda is ridiculous; the notion that Uyghur separatists are in any sense an organized threat is sheer fabrication cooked up by the Chinese government to justify its suppression of Uyghur community groups using the (nebulous and poorly organized) East Turkestan independence movement as an excuse. It is unsurprising to see this sort of opinion coming from someone with the deficit of humanity and compassion that Gingrich has; it is, however, surprising to see someone known for his intelligence so uncritically parroting Chinese talking points that have long since been proven false.
Client-9
May 17, 2009
Fairfax County doesn't need any more people, period. I grew up here, and over the course of 3 decades, Jack Herrity & Gerry Connolley sold this previously picturesque county down river to chainsaw-wielding property developers. Gone are the tree-lined highways and antique stores. Instead, we have non-stop townhouses, churches, and strip malls. I say send 50% of residents back to whereever they came from, and bring back the trees.
Michilines
May 17, 2009
It looks like the next argument is over population. Typical.
opperman@rock.com
May 18, 2009
Wow, here they come to post their idiocy...all the left-wing wackos who will destroy any American that doesn't agree with them on issues like gay marriage or abortion, but can't wait to embrace suspected terrorists. None of these detainees were picked up minding their own business at Disney World, morons. You might want to consider what they were doing when they brought themselves face-to-face with our military in the first place...oh, that's right, you hate our military too. I forgot.
kenny komodo
May 19, 2009
I don't know very much about Uighurs and probably Gingrich doesn't either. What he does know is that the Uighurs were captured by U.S. forces, probably on a battlefield somewhere. That they were trained by Islamic terrorist organizations. That they have ties to terror organizations that have declared war upon the U.S. What more is there to know? I don't personally want to get all touchy feely with the terrorists. Tell ya what, if you like the terrorists you can invite them into your homes. Just make sure your wives, daughters, sisters and mom's wear long sleeved clothes all the time. And walk behind the menfolk. And don't speak unless spoken to. Oh and one more thing, how about knocking off the personal attacks on Gingrich and try sticking to facts.
wilbur
May 19, 2009
"What he does know is that the Urghurs were captured by U.S. forces, probably on a battlefield somewhere. That they were trained by Islamic terrorist organizations. That they have ties to terror organizations that have declared war upon the U.S." Except he doesn't "know" that.....all four of those assertions are 100% wrong, as is the TV tossing nonsense. Only someone with no respect whatsoever for the intelligence of his audience would make these fact-free claims, and do so in an inflamatory way. Gingrich has no shame.
Chal
May 19, 2009
I agree with Cammy- it is irresponsible to write such falsehoods and using the Uighers at Guantanamo to make cheap political points. It's cheap partisan hackery.
rkg
May 20, 2009
Uighurs are not "Chinese Muslim"s They are Turks Who are Tibetians? Chinese Budhists ?
rkg
May 20, 2009
Uighurs are not "Chinese Muslim"s They are Turks Who are Tibetians? Chinese Budhists ?
Jeff
May 20, 2009
This is ridiculous bordering on non-nonsensical. Seeing Newt's staggering combination of ignorant punditry and straw-man argument, on this issue in print reminds me of why I don't read The Examiner on the metro. I'll stick to something credible like the economist.
Chris
May 21, 2009
Why Newt is completely wrong: http://experts.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/05/20/meet_the_real_uyghurs
freedom...
May 22, 2009
Hi guys, I am a Uyghur and I live in Australia. I do not want to criticise Newt Gingrich. I just want to ask you guys some simple questions: what would you do if "your" government had 46 times nuclear tests in your soil, ...if your government had taken millions of young girls as cheap labours... if your government had banned your language even in kindergartens...if your government banned going to church. If you have not heard about Uyghurs, please contact any uyghur community around you. I believe that you will be our good mate. Thanks guys.
iuhyi
May 22, 2009
ihui
iuhyi
May 22, 2009
ihui
john
May 22, 2009
Newt Gingrich Are you spy of China? what is your job? work for china? stop defaming,Please show your credible evidence if they do a threat to USA. they fight China,not US,
john
May 22, 2009
Uighurs are not "Chinese Muslim"s They are Turks Who are Tibetians? Chinese Budhists ?
wymck
May 23, 2009
Gingrich is announcing at normal volume what Obama dares only whisper: this Administration is actually preparing to release terrorists into our cities. Americans have died defending our rights at the hands of these illegal combatant types - so, we said, the war would be fought over there and not over here. Now the war is over here and Obama brought it here. The Chinese al-Qaeda is here and Obama brought them here. Something bad is bound to happen, and when it does, it's all on the head of the American leader - left or right, I can't believe he was really that stupid.
Patriot
May 24, 2009
Fact: American government supported Afghan Talibans in their fight against the Soviet Union during the 1980s. The Talibans were our closest buddies. But now these fanatics have turned their guns on us. Question: Do we want to give support to the sons of Talibans in their drive to establish another Islamic terrorist organization that one day may turn their guns on us? You decide.
TamyT
Jun 7, 2009
Mr. Gingrich, while I disagree with you on many issues, I have to agree with you on this issues. These guys were caught in either terrorist training camps or in combat. Their organization has repeatedly announced their affiliation and idealogy with al Qaeda, for the destruction of all infidels. To believe in their new found anti-chinese only, but not anti-US excuse is at best naive and stupid. ship them away and let them rot in any jail outside America.
Kevin
Jun 9, 2009
Anyone who thinks these men are a threat to the United States are playing into the hands of Chinese communist propaganda. This is part of the same package of lies that would have you believe the Dalai Lama is a terrorist and Taiwanese are warmongers. If you READ the US DoD's own position on these men, it is CLEAR they had no affiliation with Al Qaeda, and no intent to harm the US. So let's not play into the Chicoms' hands...we should give these men a home for compensation of 7 years of wrongful imprisonment and to show the world we can tell the difference between terrorists and muslims.
destor
Jun 12, 2009
They were in Afghanistan doing lord knows what.At least they need to wind their way through the immigration requirements.
David Pace
Jun 18, 2009
Newt, Newt isn't it tough being an out of power loser, deperate to say anything to get attention. Mary Sarah and you'll both get headlines.
Jun 23, 2009
Poor Professor Newt G. has not done his homework on how Mao's China swallowed and now digests the Uighur homeland in Central Asia. Authorities at Guantanamo decided YEARS AGO that they're no threat to Americans.
Nathan Avidor
Jul 9, 2009
But what about the Han Chinese who were were murdered, rapes, mutilated by the Uiguhurs? Anyone care to mention?
Mikey
Jul 17, 2009
Probably were in Afghanistan to set up a chinese halal take out service for the terrorists?
Their geographical location from international gave them choices to cross into Pakistan or India (a democracy) or Pakistan (less volatile) than Afghanistan, but they chose to be and were caught amongst the terrorist aliments in Afghanistan. I am sure they were not attending Sunday School or baking cookies.
Carl
Jul 22, 2009
From what I heard, Uighurs and Han have been poking each other for 250 years. I don't know the reasons but it seems that secular governments are definitely not their thing...that said, the Palau idea made sense until someone can determine whether these guys are Bigfoot or Cousin It.
whitewolf60
Sep 9, 2009
In short, it appears the Uighurs make better examples of the patriotic American than does Gingrich.
Post a comment
Sports
Toston's running, Robinson's passing lead No. 18 Oklahoma State past Iowa State 34-8
Keith Toston ran for a career-high 206 yards and three touchdowns, Zac Robinson threw a touchdown pass and No. 18 Oklahoma State bounced back from its drubbing by Texas with a 34-8 victory over Iowa State on Saturday. Full story
Politics
House Democrats clear impasse over abortion holding up vote on health care legislation
Capping months of months of struggle, House Democrats cleared an abortion-related impasse blocking a vote on sweeping health care legislation late Friday and officials expressed optimism they had finally lined up the support needed to pass President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. Full story
Entertainment
'Golden Girls' star McClanahan has bypass surgery
Rue McClanahan, who played sexy Southern belle Blanche Devereaux on "The Golden Girls," was recovering Thursday from heart bypass surgery at a New York City hospital. Full story


