Newt Gingrich

[Print]  [Email]        

Newt Gingrich on come back to the truths of the Declaration of Independence

By: Newt Gingrich
Examiner Columnist
July 3, 2009

Just in time for Independence Day, the Supreme Court has come out with a decision that forces supporters of racial and ethnic quotas to reacquaint themselves with the truths of our nation’s birth certificate, the Declaration of Independence.
 
In Ricci v. DeStafano, the high court ruled that the City of New Haven Connecticut was wrong to deny a promotion to firefighter Frank Ricci on the basis of his race. Ricci, who is white, quit his second job and studied 13 hours a day to pass a test for promotion within the fire department. But because no African-Americans scored high enough on the test to be promoted, the powers-that-be in New Haven tossed out the scores and promoted no one.
 
The Supreme Court said this was wrong and thus dealt a stiff blow to those who would respond to the question, “Where do our rights come from?” with the answer, “Government.”
 
When you believe that government is the source of rights, government – even government with “empathy” – is perfectly justified in denying the equality of its subjects. It can treat someone like Frank Ricci differently on the basis of his race or ethnicity because Frank Ricci and every other person living under that government has no more and no less dignity, responsibility and worth than government decides to grant them.

 
But the United States of America is not that kind of country.
 
Despite the best efforts of the elite media to portray it as one, the source of our rights as Americans is not a theological or religious question.   It is a fundamental question of political history.
 
If you go to the National Archives in Washington, D.C.,  you will find the Declaration of Independence, a political document. It says men and women are “endowed by their Creator will certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
 
This sentence is the fundamental fact of America. We are the only nation in history that proclaims that our fundamental rights come from God – our “creator” – directly to us as citizens. We loan the government power to enforce the law. But our individual sovereignty means that we are all equal before the law.
 
This is why slavery was such a grave injustice. It’s why quotas and the identity politics espoused by jurists like Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor are wrong. And it’s why government rationing health care is wrong.
No government bureaucrat has the right to take from you the rights that God gave you. Rationing healthcare is inevitably limiting your life at the whim of a bureaucrat or the manipulation of a politician.
 
Even with the best of intentions, judges, politicians and bureaucrats who disregard the rule of law violate the fundamental rights of Americans as granted by our Creator.  
 
In his opinion supporting the majority in the Ricci case, Justice Samuel Alito noted that the minority of justices who ruled against Frank Ricci conceded that Ricci and the other firefighters denied promotion on the basis of their race “understandably attract this Court’s sympathy.”
 
To which Alito responded, “’sympathy’ is not what petitioners have a right to demand. What they have a right to demand is evenhanded enforcement of the law.”
 
If the Ricci decision was a rebuke to believers in government-granted rights, for the rest of us it should be a wake up call; a desperately needed opportunity to reacquaint ourselves with the uniqueness of America and the wisdom of its founding document.
 
Abraham Lincoln may as well have been speaking to us today when he said back in 1858:
 
“My countrymen, if you have been taught doctrines conflicting with the great landmarks of the Declaration of Independence … if you have been inclined to believe that all men are not created equal in those inalienable rights enumerated by our charter of liberty, let me entreat to you to come back – return to the fountain whose waters spring close by the blood of the Revolution. Think nothing of me, take no thought for the political fate of any man whomsoever, but come back to the truths that are in the Declaration of Independence.”
 
“Come back to the truths that are in the Declaration of Independence.”
 
It’s hard to think of a better message for this Independence Day.
 
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has published 19 books, including 10 fiction and nonfiction best-sellers. He is the founder of the Center for Health Transformation and chairman of American Solutions for Winning the Future. For more information, see newt.org. His exclusive column for The Examiner appears Fridays.
 
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

PaulCC

Jul 3, 2009

As much as I agree with the Court's ruling on reverse discrimination, I cannot believe the test was totally unbiased or that everyone had an opportunity to review pre-test material much like what is available for many career positions. Not ONE black applicant passed??? Either the test was unfair or the applicants that took the test were not prepared well enough for it. I believe it was the latter. The question New Haven should have asked and answered (not the supreme court) was why it happened in the first place. Better pre-test assistance to ALL applicants might have improved the outcome. We will never know for sure. Who knows, if it was offered, it might have given the white and Hispanic applicants an even more lopsided advantage if black applicants didn't take advantage of the training opportunity.

 

CS

Jul 3, 2009

Why is the "assumption" if a representative from every race doesn't pass a test that it is the test or "the system" that failed someone? Who said that "ALL applicants" didn't have the same opportunity? What about the person who didn't take personal initiative, who choose not to spend their own time and or resources to prepare themselves for the test? The assumption is that everyone in America except "white people" are victims. What I want to know is what is a "white person"? By suggesting your assumptions are fact, you reinforce this victim mentality, perpetrating the myth that individuals bear no responsibility in taking control of their lives/ their careers, and infer that every test is a racially challenging event.

 

Sharon JV

Jul 5, 2009

I respectfully disagree with those who would claim that the firefighter test itself is discriminatory. I do believe over the years we've given the black community permission to feel entitled by granting more and more welfare of one kind or another. They appear to think they really don't have to earn a passing test score legitimately. I live in a community with a large percentage of blacks and have seen this attitude grow over the past 30 or so years. I am hugely encouraged by the supreme court decision on the firefighters in New Haven. Everyone will be safer and happier knowing civil servants truly earned a passing grade on their application test ... and not a watered down version of a good test.

 

Pam P

Jul 6, 2009

I firmly believe there is a great deal of reverse discrimination in this country. I'm not responsible for what my ancestors did or if they owned slaves, but caucasians are held responsible by all or most black folk. My husband applied for the police department in our county, and was well qualified. He was a Marine MP and assigned to Marine One, however, because he is not black or female, he was passed over for quota. Is this the american way, is everone considered equal?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story