Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Gregory Kane: No surprise in this Nobel

By: Gregory Kane
Examiner Staff Writer
October 13, 2009

Last week President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize, eight months into a presidency in which he's done virtually nothing about world peace.

Surprised? You shouldn't be. The truth is, you should have seen this travesty coming from light-years away, for at least two reasons.

Reason No. 1: The Nobel Peace Prize isn't what it used to be. It was worth something when Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson won it during their administrations. Roosevelt successfully negotiated an end to the Russo-Japanese War. Wilson helped found the League of Nations after World War I.

Even the black Americans who won the Nobel Peace Prize before Obama had some solid achievements on their records. Ralph Bunche was instrumental in bringing about a truce in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Martin Luther King Jr. used nonviolent tactics to force the desegregation of buses in Montgomery, Ala. and public facilities in Birmingham, Ala. in the late 1950s and early 1960s.

Obama? He really, really wants world peace. Talks about it a lot. He has many good ideas about it, but when it comes to achievement, he really hasn't done anything. His winning the Nobel Peace Prize because he has some lofty ideas about achieving world peace is kind of like one of us winning the Nobel Prize for Literature for novels we plan to write.

Yes, the Nobel Peace Prize stood for something once. But when Stanley "Tookie" Williams was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize back in 2000, the award lost all of its luster for me.

You don't remember Tookie Williams? Well, in a way, that's good. He's the co-founder of the notorious Crips gang, which started in Los Angeles. Today, there are Crips sets across the nation, terrorizing law-abiding citizens as well as other gang members.

Williams himself was convicted of murdering four people in several store robberies in 1981. He was sentenced to death and finally executed in 2005, but not before the Hollywood crowd raised him to near-sainthood status.

Williams claimed he was "redeemed" and wrote children's books in which he urged them not to join gangs, as if that somehow wiped out the heinousness of his starting -- and refusing to repudiate membership in -- one of the most violent gangs it the country. His claims of redemption earned him the praise of Hollywood's sappy left.

Those of us who were left wondering how a man who caused -- directly and indirectly-- so much misery, death and suffering could end up being nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize soon learned about the nominating rules: Apparently any knucklehead can nominate any miscreant for a Nobel Peace Prize. If that's the case, what good is the darned thing?

Reason No. 2: The Nobel committee may have simply been caught up in Obamamania. We really shouldn't blame the committee for this, since many Americans -- I'll be specific here: Those who voted for Obama-- have the affliction themselves. Obama has done virtually nothing to merit a Nobel Peace Prize; he did virtually nothing to win the White House either.

I'll go over one more time Obama's credentials to lead the most powerful nation in the world. ... OK, so I won't go over them, as they simply don't exist. Before being elected to the U.S. Senate, he was a state senator in Illinois. From that position he began a rise unlike that of any other elected official in the history of the nation.

During the primary campaign for the Illinois Senate seat, Obama's main Democratic opponent was damaged by scandal, paving the way for the future president's winning the nomination. During the general election, he had to face former Ambassador Alan Keyes, whom Illinois Republicans had to import from Maryland.

Then, after winning the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, the economy went south three or four months before the general election, which helped cement Obama's win. Years ago, young black men hip to street talk and slang would say that Obama won both his U.S. Senate seat and the presidency on what they referred to as a "jive humble" -- a set of circumstances so improbable and unlikely that they make even the most ridiculous fluke seem well planned.

It looks like he may have won the Nobel Peace Prize the same way.

Examiner Columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to the Sudan.




beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

ladybug

Oct 13, 2009

Good column, thanks!

 

Barely About Barack

Oct 13, 2009

About the "jive humble", I will make this distinction: Winning the presidency required dozens of millions of people. Winning the Nobel required no more than a dozen influential people. But hey, even the President was puzzled over his win. He admitted that he didn't deserve it. But hey, why write a story about that when you can talk about Why Liberals Suck: Reason #666 Part 69 Version 7.0?

 

Mitchell Vickers

Oct 13, 2009

It would seem that Kane would prefer to have Alan ("Crazy") Keyes in the WH than Barack Obama. OK, so Obama has yet to fulfill his promise as a peace president, but the Norwegians who awarded him the Nobel could easily tell that Obama will be a far better president than the guy he replaced and evidently think that giving the Nobel to Obama will highlight the wisdom of Americans in electing him and also prod him to fulfill his promise.

 

American

Oct 13, 2009

In short, "Tookie died for your sins."

 

depaz

Oct 14, 2009

Mitchell - The jury's still out on the "wisdom" you refer to. I doubt that Mr. Kane would have preferred Alan Keyes - I think his comments mean that if Keyes had won, Obama wouldn't have been in the running for president. At least, not yet. And winning the prize because ". . .be a far better president that the guy he replaced" isn't much of an endorsement. And in his humility in accepting the award, has he mentioned which charity he's going to donate the $1M prize to??

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story