Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Gene Healy: Obama's arrogance of power

By: Gene Healy
Examiner Columnist
November 10, 2009

Last year's financial meltdown rightfully destroyed former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan's reputation as an infallible "wise man," but he said something wise in his 2007 memoirs, describing a constitutional amendment he'd been "pushing for years."

Wrote Greenspan: "Anyone willing to do what is required to become president of the United States is thereby barred from taking that office. I'm only half joking."

It's no laughing matter. After all, what sort of person wants the job badly enough to spend years living out of a suitcase, begging for cash, glad-handing through primary states, and saying things that no intelligent person could possibly believe?

Greenspan's point was that people who seek the presidency today display a pathological power lust that ought to make us uncomfortable, given the powers the modern president enjoys.

George Washington was called "the American Cincinnatus," after the Roman hero who took power reluctantly and returned humbly to his plow when crisis passed. That's the model Americans once expected presidents to follow. Things have changed, and not for the better.

The last candidate to pay tribute to the Cincinnatus model was 1996 GOP contender Bob Dole, who praised the virtues of his birthplace, Russell, Kan., insisting it was either the White House or "home." It turned out that Dole left "home" deliberately vague. After losing, he returned to his condo at the Watergate, making bucks as a lobbyist and Viagra pitchman.

As for the current POTUS, "he's always wanted to be president," according to Obama's longtime friend and advisor Valerie Jarrett. No surprise, then, that, as Newsweekeditor Jon Meacham put it in a profile of Obama earlier this year, he "likes and enjoys power," even "revels" in it.

In a fascinating article, presidential scholar Richard Ellis writes that "in the beginning, the presidency was envisioned not as an office to be enjoyed but as a place of stern duty." "Powerful cultural norms" told 19th-century presidents to approach the role humbly, with a keen awareness that power corrupts.

In public and in private, early presidents often acknowledged their deficiencies. "No event could have filled me with greater anxieties," Washington said of his election. Likewise, in his first inaugural, Jefferson worried that the task he'd undertaken was "above my talents."

Today, Ellis explains, the public demands greater confidence from presidential aspirants. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tells us that when he congratulated Barack Obama for a "particularly fine" speech Obama made as a freshman senator, Obama "said quietly, 'I have a gift, Harry.'"

Reid reports that Obama said that with "deep humility." We'll have to take his word for it.

Calvin Coolidge, a genuinely humble man and a fine president, wrote in his autobiography that it was "a major source of safety to the country" for the president "to know that he is not a great man." Few of our recent presidents display Coolidge's self-awareness.

Newsweek's Meacham reports that Barack Obama relishes "the capacity to shape reality in his image and by his lights." An interesting phrase, that -- reminiscent of the Bush aide who bragged to reporter Ron Suskind that "we're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality."

And yet, as we learned during the Bush years, reality has a way of fighting back.

Obama's supporters have embraced the epithet Suskind's source coined. They fancy themselves members of the "reality-based community." Yet they doggedly defend a president for whom the word "hubris" might have been invented -- one who thinks that the government, under his direction, can rationally reshape the one-sixth of the U.S. economy devoted to health care.

Our president describes his budget as a "blueprint" for America's future, and believes that, with the proper mix of social workers and soldiers, we can bring orderly governance to Afghanistan, which has never enjoyed it.

We'd do far better if our presidents had Coolidge's sense of his own limitations and of government's as well.

It's easy enough to blame the overconfident, self-aggrandizing characters who seek the office. But at the end of the day, we're the ones who reward them. Unless and until we seek out candidates who share Coolidge's modesty, we'll have no one to blame but ourselves.

Examiner Columnist Gene Healy is a vice president at the Cato Institute and the author of "The Cult of the Presidency."




beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

depaz

Nov 10, 2009

A humble Obama. What a concept.

 

ladybug

Nov 10, 2009

Hubris has always been a challenge for BHO. Coming from the generation where everyone gets a prize, add to that the special attention to a charismatic, bright man of color, and the fact that we live in a time of reality TV and we see how he got there. I only hope that he really cares about leaving a legacy of a serious, thoughtful president, not a legacy of rock star of the world.

 

TennesseeVolunteer

Nov 10, 2009

A humble man gives all men as much freedom as possible knowing that each man should go his own way.
The arrogant man thinks he knows better what our needs and wants are.
Which one is our the POTUS?

 

livrfeordie

Nov 10, 2009

It is only when a man understands his own limitations that he can truly see and understand the world around him.

 

Rodger

Nov 10, 2009

This is a stupid article -- with everything that it takes to be president which man in the last 40 years that's run for president has been a humble -- George Bush certainly wasn't I wonder if you wrote a similar piece about George Bush or was his arrogance not as bothersome

 

thunder

Nov 10, 2009

Rodger,

Just so you know, he did mention that the Bush White House was not a model of humility.

 

Nov 10, 2009

Hey, Thunder, don't you know that people like Rodger raise the issue of George Bush the way their leg raises when the doctor hits it with a little mallet?

B. Hussein O. has trained his followers well to point to George Bush, no matter what the issue, topic, or question.

When B. Hussein is an old man in a nursing home and the nurse is late bringing him his Metamucil, he'll still be blaming George Bush.

 

steve

Nov 10, 2009

what a waste of ink, paper and 3 minutes of my time; Presidents' like power? hmm what's your next article, the sky is blue?

 

mjishernameo

Nov 10, 2009

Honestly, I think he's not very bright. Just because he speaks slowly and tells everyone how great he is....people have fallen for it.

He's a fake. phony. empty suit.

 

Amy

Nov 10, 2009

Living in NH, I have the privilege of seeing presidential candidates up close and in person, early and often. Your comments about Obama and candidates in general are astute. One thing: for all his flaws, I believe McCain may have been an exception to this rule. He didn't lie, make everything about him, and instead of BSing he admitted when he didn't have an answer to a question. He seemed to be enduring more than enjoying the rigors of the campaign trail. He seemed to genuinely love and wish to serve his country - an extension of his military service, I thought, and that mentality of honor, courage and sacrifice.

 

Jared

Nov 10, 2009

Seems to me like the only candidate in 2008 who followed the "Cincinnatus" mold was Fred Thompson, and he was out so fast that no one even considers him a "real" candidate. Let's face it, voters time and time again fall for those who possess the very most ambition.

 

some_guy

Nov 10, 2009

I did and still do support Obama's agenda, and agree that he is more than a little smug. But that's why we elected him. We had a half-wit cowboy trying to look grown-up in a suit talking down to us for 8 years, so Obama speaking like an adult was a revelation. Our problems are huge right now, and we need the smartest mofo we can find to try to fix them. That was the whole point of his campaign, and people ate that sh*t up. I say cut him some slack for having balls, he needs them.

 

Just a Moment

Nov 10, 2009

The problem is he does not have the balls people said he has; hello. Do you believe that only smart people has the answer to all the questions? Sometimes, smart people were the cause of the problem. Bush may be a jerk and so is Barack, where lies the difference.

 

Bill Sanford

Nov 10, 2009

It is very clear that Obama is in love with extreme total power. It is also very clear that he has never held extreme total power until now. It is unfortunate that "right now" has to be Obama's learning curve time on how to utilize power.

It is clear that Obama loves power for power's sake; this is not good. It is dangerous. We can only hope that when it comes time to give up power, that Obama and the Democrats don't do something foolish.

 

ObamatheCompleteRevelation

Nov 10, 2009

some_guy, I think you have the ability to read a teleprompter confused with being intelligent. Just because someone is a good orator does not make them smart, it just makes them a puppet.

Obama will not release his college grades and I know it's because he nearly failed and thanks to affirmative action, he made it through. Obama has way too big of an ego to not release his grades had he down well! He'd be saying, "see here, I really am smart, I have better grades then Bush did." But he's not doing that is he? His grades were not very good at all!

 

BlackAdderess

Nov 10, 2009

That is absolutely correct, now how do we go about drafting a humble president who will take his/her responsibilities seriously and who will gratefully step down from office at the end of his/her term?

 

todji

Nov 10, 2009

What an idiotic article. Is the US somehow lesser than EVERY OTHER industrialized nation?

They all seem to run government health care just fine. In fact better than the US- they get similar or even better outcomes for a little more than 1/2 the cost.

The whole "Government is incapable" is rather tiresome and is pure ideology not based on fact.

 

Justy

Nov 10, 2009

BlackAddress:
We get a humble president by taking away 90% of the power that he now has and give it back to the people who once owned it. Washington and Jefferson presided over a much smaller government. Today our government is so large that it attracts power-mad people.

 

AusDem

Nov 11, 2009

what the article seems to not talk about is this. A lot of Americans believe in American exceptionalism. they rightly or wrongly (probably both), believe that America is the best country in the world, bar none, and what the country does, by and large, is on the side of good. what could be more fitting for a country that believes this than to have a president who also believes the same. americans think they are the best, so they elect someone who thinks the same.
on the positive side, given what the country is going through at the moment, wouldn't you want someone who has some level of mental fortitude and certainty?
personally, in a crisis, i wouldn't want someone who kept second guessing themselves.
finally, if this is written from a conservative point of view, the right should get their story straight. is he full of himself or is he a ditherer? im confused.

 

AusDem

Nov 11, 2009

oh right, the cato institute. yeah, the right should get its story straight.

 

Nov 11, 2009

At least Bush had the fortitude to visit many of our injured troops in the hospital. I doubt Oblama bothers with one visit, as his dislike for the military is no secret. For BO to say "let's not jump to conclusions" about the muslim terrorist at Fort Hood, shows his total lack of concern as president. His forcing an insane H/C bill down the our throats against the majority wishes proves he's always wanted to be dictator. Remember when Bush said the job would be a lot easier if he was dictator? He was giving us all a hint of who was coming next!

 

AusDem

Nov 11, 2009

"At least Bush had the fortitude to visit many of our injured troops in the hospital."
You're an idiot. He went to pay respects to the dead at Dover. Look, I hated Bush with a passion for many years. But all in all, while generally far too incompetent for the post of the president, he, I believe, has a good heart.
Obama is showing the troops the greatest respect that he could, trying to make sure he's got the overall strategy right, so that no more die for no reason. Dunno why you guys can't understand that.
How is Obama is Dictator? what a ridiculous comment! Democrats have majorities in the house and senate. People VOTED for them, and for him. correction on earlier point, you're not an idiot, your an imbecile.
He's not forcing anything down anyone's throat, its going through the standard legislative process, as is required by the Constitution. grow up.

 

higgins1990

Nov 11, 2009

I think he likes attention (and worship), and the office of president is a means to this end. Obama is a celebrity, nothing more. He has no leadership ability.

 

bobc

Nov 11, 2009

Obama is the most arrogant politician I have ever seen!
His ego is affecting all citizens with his thinking he has all the answers.
He is like all the elite politicians we have....it's his way or the highway!

Only now, we are becoming serfs to the Federal Government!

 

Dirtroad

Nov 11, 2009

Wonder if Obama will play the race card when he's not re-elected in 2010

 

benita canova

Nov 11, 2009

Hey AusDem: The Cato Institute is libertarian if anything. They support gay rights you silly! And they were pretty hard on Bush. Why attempt to dismiss the entire argument of the article by labeling them as right wing extremists? Could it be there is no adequate defense for the current Abomination-in-Chief?

 

trickleuppoverty

Nov 11, 2009

Obama isn't up for re-election until 2012. But, I'm sure he'll play it then. That is, if we still have elections...

 

Renfield

Nov 11, 2009

"[Other industrialized nations] all seem to run government health care just fine."

Which is why when wealthy Europeans get sick, they travel to the United States for care.

It doesn't matter, anyway, since global warming is going to wipe out all life on earth if we don't shut down the industrialized world by February 3, 2010, at 10:34 a.m. Eastern Time.

 

moaning turtle

Nov 11, 2009

Interestingly, Mr Obama draws as much or more scorn than Bush managed. That's not a selling point especially when the man was selected primarily over the contention we would be leaving behind partisan grandstanding for the tempered, nonpartisan center.

And in the end, we get what? Grandstanding and foreshadowing of another economic bubble in the making...yipee(?)

...(effectively) The Empire changed the drapes on the window, but that doesn't end up "shaping (the) reality" we see. No matter how charismatic the new decor may come off.

 

atc333

Nov 12, 2009

Gee, Where was Gene Healy when King George was in office? Talk about the Arrogance of Power? We are in this mess because of the last 8 years of the Bush Administration's failure to regulate, despite obvious warnings from all sides.
It took Bush years to break the economy
and the critics expect Obama to fix it in a single year? Get realistice people!

 

markit8dude

Nov 12, 2009

atc333, if you actually researched prior articles regarding Bush and the housing market bust, you'd see Bush's feet were held to the fire as well.

Mr. Healy is discussing Mr. Hope and 'Change' is anything but. IN many regards this Orator-only-in-Chief is more partisan. i.e. FCC, banking & Wall Street sector, health insurance, fed and union-led employers being primary recipients of stimulus, job creation..

 

Mark Stewart

Nov 12, 2009

This article hits on something people don't want to hear, but utterly true: Democracy sucks.

The best government that you can hope for is a dictatorship run by someone who is satisfied staying out of the way of the average citizen. Example: Hong Kong under the British.

 

MrUniteUs

Nov 16, 2009

Obama visited veterans in hospitals here and overseas, during the campaign.
As President he signed bills to increase benefits for veterans and soldiers currently serving.

Republicans worked to cut benefits during the Bush years.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story