OpEd Contributor

[Print]  [Email]        

An open letter to Notre Dame's president to release abortion protestors

By: Thomas Brejcha
OpEd Contributor
September 2, 2009

Dear Father Jenkins:

I’m writing you, as president of Notre Dame, my alma mater, with an urgent plea that you drop the criminal trespass charges that have been pending against the many defendants – most of whom are faithful, fervent pro-life Catholics – who “dared” to venture onto Notre Dame’s campus last Spring, 2009, to bear peaceful, prayerful witness to the sanctity of all human life, from conception to natural death.

 
Among them were at least one priest and several nuns, Norma McCorvey, the “Jane Roe” of Roe v. Wade, former presidential candidate Alan Keyes, two ladies – Jane Brennan, author of Motherhood Interrupted (2008), and Laura Rohling – who preach about healing and hope after abortion in the Archdiocese of Denver, Colorado, and many other non-violent participants in America’s pro-life movement.
 
Many were praying the rosary or singing religious hymns. The priest – Fr. Norman Weslin, who regularly prays and counsels abortion-bound women about live-saving alternatives outside the Omaha, Nebraska abortion facility of late-term abortionist, Dr. Leroy Carhart – carried a heavy wooden cross and a rosary.
 
Others carried signs proclaiming that life is sacred, that abortion kills children, and other pro-life messages. All were arrested, handcuffed, and hauled off to jail where they spent the night and sometimes longer in custody.

Surely that protracted detention and the humbling impact of a public arrest on trying to enter the campus of America’s premier Catholic university was enough of a penalty to offset whatever “injury” or “insult” these good people inflicted on Notre Dame’s property rights.
 
So, it was shocking to hear that the charges were not quickly dropped, and an even worse surprise to hear that these good Catholics had to return to South Bend to enter their pleas of “not guilty” and then again to demand jury trials.
 
When the St. Joseph County prosecutor backed off the latter demand, we were yet more deeply aggrieved on hearing, Fr. Jenkins, that you had responded to a request that the charges be dropped by claiming that “it is out of [your] hands.”
 
With respect, Father, the future of these cases – if they must go on – is squarely in your hands. Notre Dame is the complainant. Its security personnel directed and/or conducted the arrests, pointing out those who would be arrested (pro-lifers) and those who would not (those carrying pro-Obama signs and/or taunting the pro-lifers).
 
Participation of Notre Dame witnesses will be essential if these 88 cases – all of which are to be scheduled for jury trials – actually go forward. Some defenses that already have been raised by initial trial counsel – e.g., Catholics’ access to the Sacred Heart Basilica on campus – also would require Notre Dame witnesses’ involvement in the trials.
 
I’m not only a Notre Dame alumnus but also president and chief counsel of a public interest law firm, based in Chicago, the Thomas More Society. We founded the Society over 10 years ago to carry on the defense of a nationwide federal class action lawsuit against pro-life protesters, NOW v. Scheidler.
 
The Scheidler case involved charges that what Dr. M.L. King called “peaceable, non-violent direct action” (Letter from Birmingham Jail (April, 1963)) constituted the federal felony crimes of extortion and racketeering.
 
We won Scheidler only after two decades of litigation and three U.S. Supreme Court appeals. We finally prevailed, with two successive Supreme Court wins, both by decisive, bipartisan margins: by 8-1 (2003) and then by 8-0 (2006).
 
Notre Dame helped us when we defended NOW v. Scheidler. Fr. Hesburgh wrote letters and agreed to testify as a character witness at the trial. Fr. Joyce sent us many generous donations. Notre Dame law professor Bob Blakey argued our first Supreme Court appeal.
 
But now the “Notre Dame 88" have asked us to take the lead in their defense. Not to spite Notre Dame but because we love it, we have agreed. America’s civil rights movement is ongoing, and the pro-life movement is its next phase.
 
Notre Dame should not only support this new civil rights movement but lead it. It should honor all who dare to speak out for the dignity of all human beings – born or unborn, wanted or unwanted, humble or exalted – not prosecute them!
 
Thomas Brejcha is president of Thomas More Society Pro-Life Law Center and founder of the freethend88.org website.  
 



beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Amanda

Sep 3, 2009

Notre Dame University should not back off on the trespassing prosecutions of the invasion of its campus last May by protesters opposed to freedom of conscience for women. They should have kept their protests off-campus. Notre Dame is to be commended for honoring President Obama and not caving in to the demonstrators.

 

Mitchell Vickers

Sep 3, 2009

Being a priest or nun or praying the rosary does not exempt one from civil law regarding trespassing. What the protesters were trying to do was promote their unbiblical, unscientific notion that a fertilized egg or early fetus is the moral equivalent of being a human person. They are entitled to their opinion but they are not entitled to disobey the law, unless thet are prepared to face the consequences. What is really behind their protest is a patriarchalist denial of the constitutionally protected right of every woman to follow her conscience in deciding what to do about a problem pragnancy. The protesters seem to forget that the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s declared that conscience trumps church dogma.

 

Frank H

Sep 3, 2009

Mitchell, since you cite Vatican II, go back and review Gaudiem et Spes, 27: "Furthermore, whatever is opposed to life itself, such as any type of murder, genocide, abortion, euthanasia or wilful self-destruction, whatever violates the integrity of the human person, such as mutilation, torments inflicted on body or mind, attempts to coerce the will itself; whatever insults human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery, prostitution, the selling of women and children; as well as disgraceful working conditions, where men are treated as mere tools for profit, rather than as free and responsible persons; all these things and others of their like are infamies indeed."

We're not talking the US Constitution here. We are talking Church dogma as explained by Vatican II.

 

Barbara O'Reilly

Sep 3, 2009

I think FR.Jenkins and others like him have insulted many many Catholics.not to mention Fr Jenkins duty as a priest to protect the unborn and give no stage to anyone that doesn't believe in life.If I could, I would remove him from Notre Dame University. I personnally feel ashamed for the people who belonged on the University grounds to have been treated so badly. Shame on all responsible for them. God have mercy on all of our souls.

 

mark

Sep 3, 2009

Amanda, i love the "freedom of conscience for women." line. So if my conscience tells me to murder someone because they are an inconvenience, then it is OK????

The lies, even if eloquently presented by those who condone murder, ie. "freedom of conscience, freedom of choice, freedom of privacy..." are still just lies.

It is truly sad that in the US, on a once "Catholic" University, the right to freedom of speech that protects the most innocent among us, the unborn and the elderly and frail, has been thrown in the trash, like an aborted baby!

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, Ora Pro Nobis Peccatoribus, nunc et hora mortis nostrae!

mark

 

irishsmile

Sep 4, 2009

I commend the Thomas More Society for its active defense of our Catholic faith.... something that Notre Dame has failed to do. This former flagship of Catholic Universities in America has lost its Catholic identity and should be reduced by the bishop of that diocese to the status of a secular university.

 

RobbyS

Sep 4, 2009

I have the feeling that some on the campus would welcome the secularization of the university.

 

Scott

Sep 4, 2009

While I pray for the 88 Notre Dame protesters, I'm going to pray for the same kind of courage they showed. What a wonderful example they are to us all.

Fr. Jenkins needs our prayers too. He is only revealing that his heart is consumed with revenge if he doesn't drop the complaints.

Thank you to everyone at the Thomas More Law Center. Please keep up your wonderful work.

 

antichrist

Sep 4, 2009

I say let the protestors be nailed to a cross so they can realize that they are only going to a god who will reward them with all of the suffering that they wished upon every person who ever enjoyed sex!

 

Allan D

Sep 4, 2009

Why didn't the school heed Obama's call to be "fairminded?" They should have also arrested the pro-Obama protesters who were equally trespassing. Dialogue is useless without action. And if Jenkins is true to his committment to "dialogue," why won't he dialogue with the pro-lifers? How hypocritical! And to antichrist: pro-lifers are not anti-sex. Without sex, there won't be life; if we're against it, then we're against life! What we're against is the destruction of innocent life. Too many talk about sex but stop short of the responsibility that comes with it.

 

TotallyCatholic

Sep 5, 2009

As a devout RC I cannot believe ND is doing this - to people who were praying **the rosary**....****on a 'Catholic' college campus**** ! I certainly hope alumni will cut off their financial support for this liberal college - they are "catholic" with a lower case c - in name only. It's time for Rome to clamp down on all of these liberal 'catholic' colleges - they have no right to use the word 'Catholic' in describing their schools. It is a disgrace.

 

Amanda

Sep 6, 2009

Some of the comments above go far beyond being merely silly. "Mark" may be commended for remembering a Latin prayer, but it's nonsense to think that freedom of conscience extends to murder or a host of other crimes. My freedom ends at the other person's nose. Moreover, "Mark" may believe that early fetuses are persons but that opinion is not supported by either the Bible or modern science. Does he believe that an acorn is an oak tree? Maybe he should set his Latin aside and read what the Second Vatican Council had to say about the primacy of conscience over dogma. Others need to be reminded that sometimes is is more important for an institution to be a university rather than a mere mouthpiece for shaky mid-19th century patriarchalist baloney.

 

Commonsense

Sep 7, 2009

Ignorance is very - very dangerous.

 

Sep 7, 2009

Ignorance is very - very dangerous. Look what it brought to Washington.

 

Sep 7, 2009

Amanda,

Person is not only about the body, it is about the body and soul. If you have a rational soul (like us and the angels) and a body (like us and the animals) - which a fetus does, then you are a human person. Angels are also persons, and they don't have bodies. God is three persons. So, person has nothing to do with size or shape of a physical body.

 

Law and Order

Sep 8, 2009

They should be whipped and imprisoned. People who break the law should be punished. No one should be exempt.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story