OpEd Contributor

[Print]  [Email]        

Grace-Marie Turner: Compulsory insurance has consequences

By: Grace-Marie Turner
Op-Ed Contributor
September 25, 2009

Americans increasingly fear that health reform is something Congress is planning to do to them, not for them. Nowhere is this truer than with Washington's plan to require every American to have health insurance or face a hefty new tax.

Liberals believe the federal requirement is necessary to achieve universal coverage. This is a worthy goal, but it sets up a cascade of big-government spending and intrusions that the American people are saying, as clearly as they can, they do not want.

For starters, imposing an "individual mandate" means the government must define what constitutes acceptable health insurance. All of the bills making their way through Congress would require a very expensive benefits package.

Hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxpayer subsidies would be needed to help Americans pay for this rich coverage.

Families that don't buy insurance would face a new tax of up to $1,900 a year. People with expensive health insurance likely would be hit with a 40 percent premium increase as their insurance companies pass a new excise tax on to them.

Young people would face higher premiums to subsidize older Americans. And the government would tell everyone how much they can afford to pay for all of their health costs, up to $20,000 a year for those with incomes above $96,000, for example.

Further, employers would be required to provide health insurance, help their workers pay premiums, or face penalties. Many of them don't believe the promised government subsidies for some small businesses would help and say the new burden would lead to less hiring and more layoffs.

The mandate also puts the federal government in the business of regulating health insurance, inevitably triggering price controls and leading to restrictions on access to care.

Only one in five Americans say their health insurance coverage and the quality of the care they receive will improve if a bill passes Congress this year. How right they are!

President Obama argued against imposing a mandate for health insurance during the campaign saying, "It's not that people don't want health insurance. It's that they can't afford it."

He was right and should focus now, not on the individual mandate, but on making health care and health insurance truly affordable. That is what the American people want.

If insurance were more affordable, millions more people would buy it, especially if Congress gives everyone the same tax break for buying coverage. That's a simple solution that could expand insurance coverage without massive new government spending and bureaucracies.




beltway confidential

I just got a response from Sen. Christopher Bond, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to the White House accusation that critics who question the Obama...

The Audi ad mocking overzealous environmentalism "hits home," San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom tweeted during the Super Bowl. The locally conceived advertisement was enough to...

In a brief op-ed in USA Today, White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan charges that critics who question the Obama administration's decision to grant Miranda rights to...

Wall Street Journal -- Leverage Sought In Health Summit Republicans are asking President Obama to make a show of good faith before his proposed health care summit by publicly...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Fight govt intrusions on freedom

Sep 25, 2009

Well said, Ms. Turner. Freedom for gun owners, freedom for abortion, freedom for pornographers, freedom for drug users.

 

Wylie

Sep 25, 2009

Here are the core elements what will be contained in the “health care reform compromise” after the so-called “public option” is in all likelihood dropped; both the Bacus and Wyden-Bennett bill contain all of these items:

(a) Federal Regulation aka HEALTH CZAR/DEATH PANELS/RATIONING
(b) Employer/Individual Mandates aka NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE
(c) Government Subsidies aka MIDDLE CLASS MEDICAL WELFARE

With the Federal Government setting the rules, forcing everyone to participate, and is paying the bills for most of the middle class through subsidies how is this anything other than Nationalization?

 

Jim Von der Heydt

Sep 26, 2009

You seem to have left off the argumentation part of your article. If universal coverage is a worthy goal, what's YOUR plan for bringing it about?

Obama was wrong in the campaign. Insurance is made affordable precisely by making it affordable -- simultaneously eliminating free riders and encouraging young healthy people (who go bankrupt if a bus hits them) to, indeed, subsidize the older versions of themselves, in exchange for being subsidized in turn down the road. This is the principle behind Medicare, and your side already lost this argument 45 years ago. Many of you have decided your only chance is to be dishonest, so you deserve some credit for opting instead simply not to make a coherent argument.

Good luck!

 

JvdH

Sep 26, 2009

Oops, that second 'affordable' should read 'mandatory.'

 

kimutaku

Sep 28, 2009

Thank you for your sharing,I like this.tiffany pendant

Gucci Rings

 

yanjia

Sep 29, 2009

ugg boot on sale

uggs boots on sale

ugg women's nightfall boots

ugg womens nightfall boots chestnut

ugg skimmer

 

happytiffany

Sep 30, 2009

OH yeah,That's great

Tiffany Earrings

tiffany silver earring

tiffany rings

 

http://www.pretty-tiffany.com

Sep 30, 2009

Thank you very much,I have read it now.
And welcome to my site,
tiffany ring

Tiffany Rings

 

yuemin

Oct 15, 2009



OH yeah,That's greatTiffany Earring


Thank you for your sharing.

 

a123

Oct 29, 2009

louis vuitton

[url=http://www.flashreplica.com]louis vuitton[/url]

 

dasdjjj

Nov 6, 2009

j025123@163.com http://www.hao123.com
louis vuitton

[url=http://www.flashreplica.com]louis vuitton[/url]

 

asdfasdfsad

Nov 14, 2009

Roll forming machine

 

Jan 11, 2010

projeksiyon

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Slideshow: Washington area snow photos

Here are some of the best snow photos in the DC area from the Associated Press, the Examiner' s own Andrew Harnik and courtesy photos from Kathleen Dellinger: Full story

Politics

Rep. John Murtha dies at 77

A spokesman says Democratic Rep. John Murtha of... Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story