OpEd Contributor

[Print]  [Email]        

Admiral Paul Rohrer: Don't reduce American carrier strength

By: Admiral Paul Rohrer
OpEd Contributor
July 30, 2009

Hot on the heels of President Obama canceling the Air Force's most advanced strike fighter, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) announced this week that we now face a much greater shortfall in Navy and Marine Corps strike fighters than was previously estimated. Last year, CRS predicted a shortfall of 125 navy fighter jets by 2017. They now predict that the shortfall will more be more than 300 jets.

The American people deserve to understand what those shortages really mean.

On the surface, President Obama's defense budget calls for cutting the Navy's aircraft carrier strike groups from 11 to 10. But a closer inspection reveals that Obama's program delays and budget cuts will do terrible harm to the readiness and capability of our carrier groups.

Although America does have 10 carrier groups, we cannot deploy all 10 at any given time. Both personnel and equipment require shore time for maintenance, rest, and training. Along with the carrier groups that are temporarily rotated out of service, the worsening shortage of fighter aircraft is reducing the number of ready carrier groups even further.

Obama's defense budget is cutting back production of F-18 Hornets and Super Hornets -- the Navy's top fighter aircraft - long before the new F-3Mark Tapscott:26406784:26406784:Mark Tapscott Joint Strike Fighter is ready to deploy. Conservative estimates are that the new F-3Mark Tapscott:26406784:26406784:Mark Tapscotts won't be operational for another six years, leading to what CRS now estimates to be a 300-plane shortfall.

A carrier group typically sails with 50 strike fighters on board. If the F-18 inventory shortfall climbs from 125 to 300, as the CRS now predicts, then you have a shortage of six carrier groups worth of jets.

Submitting a budget to Congress that simply ignores an anticipated shortage of six aircraft carriers worth of fighters is, to put it mildly, no way to provide for fleet readiness.

Rendering our carrier strike groups unready for deployment will leave America less capable of defending ourselves and our allies against rogue nations around the world. And, such a show of weakness unnecessarily encourages adversaries to test our will.

Retired Admiral Paul Rohrer served in the Navy for more than four decades, retiring as a rear admiral. He currently resides in McLean, Va.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

StargazerInSavannah

Jul 30, 2009

I have been waiting for a move by the Administration that would offer two or three carrier groups to Osama. Sort of a Obama to Osama deal to help 'level the playing field'.
There have been occasions during the past fifty years when I wasn't certain where the most dangerous enemy my country faced was quartered and just who his allies might be. I still don't know where all the allies of my are, but I recognized the enemy well over a year ago.

 

Bob Skinner

Jul 30, 2009

The USA Military has never recovered from Clinton's hatchet job, so with another democratic party president the USA will only be left with apologies and groveling to our adversaries.

 

b spilinek

Jul 30, 2009

i am not a racist or a radical but here is my assumption. give an black man power and unlimited funds and he is unstopable.

 

MARV

Jul 31, 2009

It is as if Mr. Obama want to give this nation to our enemies.
His type of government will finally give the nations who want to destroy this nation the tools to do it, does he know that this is what he is doing, it is my opinion "yes" he does,and so does our congress.
My opinion is vote all of them out of office, I think we would be better off if we had all novis running this nation, if they believed that we need to run this nation by our Constitution, and Bill of Rights.

Ship those person who want to destroy this nation back to their lands which they came from, "our give them to someone who wants them".

Maybe put them in prison for treason, because that is what it really is.

 

Shanghaied

Aug 2, 2009

Sorry Admiral, but its time for the gutting of the defense budget once again.
Oh, and now that a set of Real American Military despising socialists are in charge of all Gov't. branches, it won't be a pretty sight, nor will a decade be long enough to rebuild after the damage is done.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Houston Rockets coach Rick Adelman, center, reacts with his staff Jack Sikma, left, and Elston Turner, right, to a called foul against his team as they play the Atlanta Hawks during the third quarter ...

Tracy McGrady says he's ready to play, Rockets believe it's still too soon after knee surgery

Tracy McGrady is eager to play. The Houston Rockets say he'll have to wait. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story