OpEd Contributor

[Print]  [Email]        

Kristan Hawkins on why nationalized healthcare will it worse for special-needs patients

By: Kristan Hawkins
OpEd Contributor
July 15, 2009

When my son Gunner was born, it was the best day of my life. But it was followed soon after by the worst day of my life -- when he was diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF), a life-threatening genetic disease. Gunner was just over two months old. I was shocked; I had never known anyone with CF.

Adding to this shock was finding out how Gunner would be impacted by the new nationalized healthcare system proposed by President Obama and Congress. It was worse than I'd ever imagined.

In our search for the best hospitals and treatments for CF in both the U.S. and abroad, we came across frightening statistics from countries with government-run healthcare systems. While the current life expectancy for an American CF patient is 37, in Ireland, the rate is 27. In the words of the Irish Times, this is a scandal.

A report by the British Cystic Fibrosis Trust found that none of the 38 CF centers in Britain reported that they received enough funding to provide government-recommended levels of care for patients.

According to President Obama and the Democrats in Washington, a nationalized healthcare plan isn't so bad. But the examples above make it clear that for patients like Gunner, a nationalized system would mean the difference between life and death.

Here's where my son loses his battle: President Obama has specifically said that the "chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care bill." Therefore, we need to have a "difficult" and "democratic conversation" to give "guidance" as to what patients will receive life-sustaining, and expensive, treatment.

Should President Obama get his way, the life of my son and millions across the country who are elderly, chronically ill, or require expensive medical treatment, will be in the hands of some bureaucrat in Washington.

I want my family and my doctor to control my son's healthcare decisions, not a government-appointed committee. I want my son to have access to life-saving drugs and tests, which would be limited. And I want my son to have access to CF nurses and doctors without long wait lines or delayed or denied treatment, which could decrease his life expectancy.

Gunner deserves to have the best chance for life and the best care available. At the very least, he deserves compassion. And yet one thing is clear: All of this will be stolen away if Washington takes over health care.

Kristan Hawkins is executive director of Students for Life of America. For more information visit: www.healthcareforgunner.com




beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Liz

Jul 15, 2009

AMEN!!!!

 

CFMommee

Jul 15, 2009

Nicely put. It's an injustice that politicians, with no medial training and who have never met my son, can ultimately make decisions on if he is allowed to live or not. That is what is happening here. We ALL deserve the best care and treatment available. What happens when we are on the cutting edge of advancements in treatment but government says it's too expensive? Then what? We know the effective treatment is there but we aren't allowed to access it.

 

Jul 23, 2009

um, yeah, fyi, our health care is managed by government, maybe not the Federeal government, but definitely by people who think they know best making decisions about what we can and cannot do. HMO, PPO, your senator. it's the same.

 

judyhhs

Jul 23, 2009

I have had cancer for over 6 yrs. Fought like hell to live to finish raising my youngest who is now 18. We have a basic right to choose LIFE

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story