OpEd Contributor

[Print]  [Email]        

Government-forced contracts are Card Check's real threat

By: F. Vincent Vernuccio
OpEd Contributor
July 1, 2009

The Employee Free Choice Act includes a Card Check section to eliminate the secret ballot in union organization elections. The outcry against this antidemocratic process may result in its removal. But even with Card Check removed, the most insidious section of the bill will still remain.

Card Check's third section, innocuously called "Facilitating Initial Collective Bargaining Agreements," would go much further than simply "facilitating." It would allow the government to impose a contract on many businesses and workers who would otherwise negotiate terms for themselves.

Businesses and workers would have only 120 days to negotiate and agree to possibly hundreds of pages of contract terms and conditions until one side could force the other to accept the two-year government-imposed contact. Card Check calls the process "arbitration," but the procedure described in the bill is known as compulsory binding interest arbitration, which is quite different from the arbitration most people know.

Most arbitration in the private sector is known as grievance arbitration. Here, an arbitrator is voluntarily chosen to interpret an existing contract, which was originally freely agreed to by both parties. Everyone is there because they choose to be.

Card Check, on the other hand, would allow one party to force the other into compulsory binding- interest arbitration. Both parties would be required to abide by terms of a contract to which neither had previously agreed. Essentially, it would impose a contract on a party against its will.

This allows the government to write a contract from scratch, going much further than the traditional role of an arbitrator interpreting existing terms. Even if a representative of a newly formed union requested arbitration the workers would still have little say in the final outcome.

Unlike today where the workers can vote on an agreement, Card Check would give a union representative the power to present the union's position to the arbitrator. The arbitrator would then create the contract, essentially erasing the worker from the final decision.

The arbitrator will have say over every aspect of the working relationship between the workers and the employer. This includes pay, work schedules, safety, health benefits, vacation, and possibly forcing workers into a union's under-funded pension plan.

This harsh arbitration will be run by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, which is headed by a political appointee. Politics could enter the arbitrator's decision. One party may request an arbitrator knowing they supported the administration in power, expecting to be rewarded by a favorable contract.

Abolishing the secret ballot in the workplace incentivizes the most depraved instincts of labor officials to pressure and intimidate workers into joining their union; the arbitration section of Card Check rewards the worst instincts of government, to arbitrarily impose its will on private businesses.

F. Vincent Vernuccio is a former Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management at the Department of Labor under President George W. Bush. He is editor of efcaupdate.org




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Jim

Jul 1, 2009

So, the arbitrator can implement proposals from the union, the company, and/or something out of his/her brief case. If the employees don't like the contract they don't have a vote to approve or reject? So where's the "free choice"? Government deciding what's best for employers and citizens isn't the answer. Ditto for health care.

 

Mom

Jul 6, 2009

About card check. More insidious than I thought........

 

Greg

Jul 6, 2009

Directive 10-289 from Atlas Shrugged. This is the first step.

 

djaymick

Jul 7, 2009

First off, if people think that the government will be unbiased in its collective bargaining agreement, please ask the secured bondholders of GM and Chrysler if they agree. Second, with the UAW taking a vested interest in both GM and Chrysler, has this set up a conflict of interests with Ford and other auto companies, whose wmployees are members of the UAW? The UAW can now control the direct labor costs of their competition. Lastly, with all the new spending that is coming out of Washington, our Congress is making sure that the money goes to companies that practice the Davis-Bacon rules, that will cripple non-union companies.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Houston Rockets coach Rick Adelman, center, reacts with his staff Jack Sikma, left, and Elston Turner, right, to a called foul against his team as they play the Atlanta Hawks during the third quarter ...

Tracy McGrady says he's ready to play, Rockets believe it's still too soon after knee surgery

Tracy McGrady is eager to play. The Houston Rockets say he'll have to wait. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story