OpEd Contributor

[Print]  [Email]        

Self-serving Republicans gave Democrats cap and trade victory

By: Noel Sheppard
OpEd Contributor
July 1, 2009

They unanimously voted with their entire party against President Obama's stimulus bill in February, and did so again in April opposing the President's debt-laden 2010 budget. Yet these eight Republican House members broke ranks on Friday, awarding victory to the Democrats in narrowly passing the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES).

For the record, their names are Rep. Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE), Rep. Mark Steven Kirk (R-IL), Rep. Leonard Lance (R-NJ), Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), Rep. John McHugh (R-NY), and Rep. Dave Reichert (R-WA).

With a final vote of 219 to 212, they could have buried this bill while saving Americans from dramatically higher energy prices, as well as the certain elimination of many manufacturing jobs. Instead, they voted largely for personal political reasons.

According to Ron Williams of Delaware's News Journal, Castle is likely to run for Vice President Joe Biden's former Senate seat now held by Ted Kaufman who is stepping down in 2010. Kirk apparently is considering a challenge for Obama's vacated Senate seat currently held by the controversy-ridden Roland Burris. It's not hard to speculate that both of these Republicans felt a no vote on Friday could have hindered their Senate ambitions.

As for the others, all but Smith represent districts that Obama won in November. Many observers, including Congressional Quarterly's Greg Giroux, believe this might have impacted their decisions.

Maybe their advisors should have counseled them to use the stimulus and/or budget votes for future political positioning rather than this one. After all, the stimulus passed 246 to 183, and the budget was approved 233 to 196. As such, those votes were far less consequential as both measures would have passed without them.

If the eight joined the GOP to vote as a unanimous block, the bill's failure would have been blamed on the 44 dissenting Democrats. ACES was already in trouble with many Blue Dogs, and still faces even greater difficulty in the Senate where passage at this time seems unlikely.

The best thing for Republicans in Obama-supporting districts would be to break the President's string of legislative victories and start saddling him with highly-publicized losses. With healthcare reform apparently losing moderate Democratic support thanks to the price tag, an ACES defeat Friday could have given Republicans some much-needed momentum heading into this next crucial legislative battle.

Republicans might still win this battle when ACES moves to a more global warming skeptical Senate in September. But a victory before the Fourth of July recess could have been just the tonic necessary for the resuscitation of the currently not so Grand Old Party.

What the party certainly didn't need was a group of opportunistic congressmen snatching defeat from the jaws of a crucial victory.

Noel Sheppard is associate editor of the Media Research Center's NewsBusters.org.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Pizthoff

Jul 1, 2009

But for these Party traitors, HR2454 would already be pushing up daisies. We just have to double our efforts to see the Waxman/Markey atrocity doesn't survive the Senate. And may we all remember the Fab8 come election time. Tough enough these days being a conservative republican. We don't need people like this that stand for nothing but themselves.

 

PacificGatePost

Jul 1, 2009

CAP and TRADE Will Create Companies TOO BIG TO FAIL So what’s the real scoop? Ignore the proselytizers and find out from those who “shaped” the Bill …. http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/07/dear-mr-president-thanks-again-for-cap.html

 

The Liberty Journal

Jul 3, 2009

What this article fails to mention is that many of those democrats who crossed the aisle only voted opposed the bill because the outcome of the vote was not in question. As mentioned over that the liberty journal, Nancy Pelosi gave her sheep the OK to vote against the bill, due to many of them being up for re-election in 2010, while the majority of their constituents don't support this absurd Cap & Tax on energy plan. The fact that these eight neocons voted in favor of the bill did not determine the outcome. A better story, and what I'd like to know, if why did each these representatives support this bill? What is it for them, personally. I suggest you follow the money and you'll find the answers..

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Graphic surveys NFL players concerning concussions

NFL union pans commissioner's call for players to report on teammates' possible concussions

The NFL Players Association opposes commissioner Roger Goodell's call for players to tell their teams' medical staffs if they think a teammate shows symptoms of a concussion, saying that is not an adequate solution. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story