OpEd Contributor

[Print]  [Email]        

Sen. Jim DeMint: Washington politicians' titanic lie

By: Sen. Jim DeMint
OpEd Contributor
October 2, 2009

If you watch C-Span for a while, you're sure to hear a politician or pundit criticizing some idea by comparing it to "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic." It's a vivid illustration of the short-sightedness and futility of so much of what Washington does superficially to improve failed programs.

In Washington today, however, we are witnessing an unprecedented extension of the Titanic analogy: Both parties and both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue are focused on rearranging our deck chairs while there is still time to steer around the iceberg, if only someone would grab the wheel.

This week, the Associated Press reported that for the next two years, the Social Security system will pay out more money than it takes in. The story contained the following bizarre formulation:

"The deficits -- $10 billion in 2010 and $9 billion in 2011 -- won't affect payments to retirees because Social Security has accumulated surpluses from previous years totaling $2.5 trillion. But they will add to the overall federal deficit."

How can it be that Social Security has $2.5 trillion in reserves, but that a mere $19 billion shortfall will add to the federal deficit? Because the "surpluses" do not exist. The Trust Fund is empty and has been for years. There is no money in there; just IOU's. That's why the 2010-2011 shortfalls will add to the deficit - we don't have the money.

The very concept of a Social Security Trust Fund is not so much a myth as it is a lie. For decades, Congress has raided the Trust Fund to pay for other government programs and used accounting gimmicks to hide the true size of the deficit.

Even at the end of the Clinton Administration, when the federal government was supposedly running a surplus, the national debt went up every single year. The surpluses were as imaginary as the Trust Funds.

So insatiable is Washington's appetite to spend that the federal government has not only spent all the money it has, but all the money previous generations were thought to have saved, and now we're working our way through the money future generations hope to earn.

What our government has done is a crime. And yet, almost no one in Washington - in either party - seems interested in the giant iceberg we're steaming toward... Not when there are deckchairs to rearrange!

This year alone, the Senate has passed a $787 billion stimulus, a $350 billion Wall Street bailout extension, a $400 billion, earmark-infested omnibus spending bill, a $109 billion loan to the International Monetary Fund, $6 billion to federalize charities and pay volunteers, $3 billion for cash for clunkers, $400 million in corporate welfare to help tourism corporations advertise overseas, and a $4 billion bailout of the Postal Service.

(To see how your Senator voted on these Titanic Spending Bills, go to SenateConservatives.com, a site I've created to hold senators of both parties accountable.)

And now Congress is working its way through 2010 appropriations bills that will increase spending 10-20 percent over last year. Those bills will include thousands of willfully wasteful earmarks, spending billions of dollars we don't have.

And all of this is being done in a fiscal context that can only be described as terrifying. This year, Washington will spend twice as much as it takes in. The national debt is now as large as our entire economy, nearing $12 trillion borrowed from countries like China.

The long-term projected shortfalls for Social Security and Medicare alone are more than $100 trillion. Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn has warned that every child born in America today is burdened with a $400,000 bill to pay for federal programs in the coming decades.

It is in this climate - incredibly, maddeningly - that Congress and the president are trying to pass a health care takeover plan that will cost an additional trillion dollars in the near term, and orders of magnitude more in the long run.

And all along, the architects of this fiscal catastrophe are called "progressive" and compassionate, while skeptical taxpayers at tea parties and town halls are derided as crazy.

And thus comes the Titanic comparison full circle. You see, when our leaders finally run us into that iceberg, they know they will have seats set aside for themselves in the lifeboats. It's the rest of us, our parents and our children, who will find ourselves locked in steerage, forced by our ruling class to pay for their sins, and go down with the sinking ship.

There's still time to rescue the ship, but Washington is too busy fiddling with the deckchairs. To prevent catastrophe, the American people are going to have to take the wheel.

Republican Sen. Jim DeMint is the junior senator from South Carolina.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Karateka

Oct 2, 2009

Props to Senator DeMint for his stand on fiscal policy, and Honduras.

Viva 15-0!

 

WorkingTommyC

Oct 2, 2009

It's an old cliche but it doesn't apply any better elsewhere than it does to Lindsey Graham and the other neo-cons along with the Dems.

For the most part, in terms of where we're headed, this country has just one party with run-off elections in the fall.

Fascism has never been more firmly established in this country than it has now thanks to Bush and now Obama.

 

bob

Oct 2, 2009

Join the campaign for fiscal responsibility

Send a personalized note to your members of Congress (or ALL members) and tell them to STOP the Spending now!

http://conservativeoutpost.com/campaign/cta/stop_spending

 

Ktystyna

Oct 2, 2009

Where was DeMint while Bush and the GOP were cutting taxes for the rich and getting this country into the crazy and wasteful Iraq war?

 

JeffT

Oct 2, 2009

To Ktystyna and other like-minded Kool-aid drinkers. There were no tax cuts for the rich. They pay more of the taxes collected after Bush's presidency than before. MORE, not LESS. Can't make it much more clear. It was not taxes that got this avalanche of red ink started, it was profligate spending by everyone in Washington. Obscene spending on useless bridges to nowhere and other extravagances started the snowball and TARP, the "stimulus," and the bailouts sped it on its way.

 

Callawar

Oct 3, 2009

Sen Demint is the problem with Washington, obfuscate and blame someone else.

 

Mike Konkel

Oct 3, 2009

Holy crap, someone just realized that. I think, however, what the elite of both parties is not counting on is this huge backlash from us boomers who have found our piggy banks raided.

Ah, and still you say you don't believe, we're on the eve of destruction!

Obamacare, national sales tax,cap and trade, all of these are a means of the Obama agenda to not only destroy American families, American jobs, but also American industry at large. To level the playing field across the globe is Obama's goal. Think population control and you will reach one of Obama's principle supporting tenets.

Sorry prez, WE THE PEOPLE are awake now and you can, as I quote Johnny Paycheck now, take your agenda and czars and shove them.

 

wkeef

Oct 3, 2009

Thanks for the explanation of that idiotic statement. When I read it in the paper a couple of days ago I just shook my head in disbelief as it absolutely made no sense when tested with the reeality of what is happening in the nation's finances.

Now I feel that I am not totally stupid!

 

silvrspur

Oct 3, 2009

To Callawar: It's obvious you have a problem with understanding plain English--it's both parties at fault.

 

clemont

Oct 4, 2009

demint is right there is time does any one know how to spell recall. the dems think that they have a nuclear option so do the people in every state in america. (RECALL)just do it. PS would some one tell me why the fed does not deport the thirteen pluss million illegals that are here abusing the system

 

Joanne

Oct 5, 2009

If everyone could please take note: the health care plan will not be in effect until 2014 but the collection of funding it will start in 2010. And God only knows what these fools in Washington will spend the money on. They all suffer from complusive spending disorder. Just check out the pork being inserted in the Defense Department's appropriations bill. Democrats and Republicans inserting personal pork projects that have nothing to do with defense.

It's maddening that they can't seem to stop themselves. Every appropriation bill is an opportunity to spend, spend, spend.

I wish people posting here would not automatically dismiss this article and actually go to the website DeMint lists and see where your representative is spending YOUR money. It's seriously, seriously out of control.

 

Colonel

Oct 5, 2009

There is no question that there are no longer "Republicans and Democrats" in Congress. There is simply the "Washington Party" - a group of "ins" who will do anything to stay there.

 

grumpygresh

Oct 6, 2009

Obamaobot Ktystyna look up the Laffer curve. When you reduce top marginal rates you actually get more tax revenue. This happened during the Bush, Reagan and Kennedy tax cuts. When you have more tax revenue, you get lower deficits if you maintain level spending. Lower deficits will reduce the amount the government spends on interest payments. Almost 1/2 of the federal budget is from borrowed money.

 

Adjoran

Oct 7, 2009

Thank you, Senator DeMint, for giving us the extra effort at representation in DC while our other "Senator" is on indefinite sabbatical while serving as John McCain's valet.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Economy

Investors seeking Stanford assets urge Antiguan court to remove British firm as liquidator

A group of investors is urging an Antiguan court to remove a British accounting firm appointed to collect assets of a Caribbean offshore bank at the center of an alleged Ponzi scheme by Texas financier R. Allen Stanford. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story