Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Diana West: Shariah is our enemy, not Afghanistan

By: Diana West
Examiner Columnist
October 4, 2009

Today's column is for all hawkish Americans currently wrestling with looming doubts about the pointlessness of the U.S. mission in Afghanistan and clubbing them down with the much-mentioned perils of leaving Afghanistan to "the terrorists."

In short, it's about how to "lose" Afghanistan and win the war.

And what war would that be? Since 9/11, the answer to this question has eluded our leaders, but it remains the missing link to a cogent U.S. foreign policy.

It is not, as our presidents vaguely invoke, a war against "terrorism," "radicalism," or "extremism"; and it is not, as the current hearts-and-minds-obsessed Afghanistan commander calls it, "a struggle to gain the support of the [Afghan] people."

It is something more specific than presidents describe, and it is something larger than the outlines of Iraq or Afghanistan. The war that has fallen to our generation is to halt the spread of Islamic law (Shariah) in the West, whether driven by the explosive belts of violent jihad, the morality-laundering of petro-dollars, or decisive demographic shifts.

This mission demands a new line of battle around the West itself, one supported by a multilevel strategy in which the purpose of military action is not to nation-build in the Islamic world, but to nation-save in the Western one.

Secure the borders, for starters, something "war president" George W. Bush should have done but never did. Eliminate the nuclear capabilities of jihadist nations such as Iran, another thing George W. Bush should have done but never did -- Pakistan's, too.

Destroy jihadist actors, camps and havens wherever and whenever needed (the strategy in place and never executed by Bill Clinton in the run-up to 9/11). But not by basing, supplying and supporting a military colossus in Islamic, landlocked Central Asia.

It is time, as retired Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely first told me last April, to "let Afghanistan go." It is not in our interests to civilize it.

But we would "lose face" in leaving Afghanistan, supporters say. News flash: We lose face every day in Afghanistan executing a costly, impotent policy based on massive state bribery, the public devaluation of American life ("population protection" trumps "force protection"), and deference to Islamic custom, as when female Marines are ordered to wind head scarves under their helmets for missions.

And the point of this mass American supplication? To win a local popularity contest in which the only competition is the Taliban. Earth to military geniuses: The people are already with you, or they're against you.

In other words, it's time to toss the policy of standing up Shariah states such as Iraq and Afghanistan onto that ash heap of history.

It's time to shore up liberty in the West, which, while we are stretched and distracted by Eastern adventures, is currently contracting in its accommodations of Shariah, a legal system best described as sacralized totalitarianism.

Such a war -- to block Shariah in the West -- requires more than military solutions. For starters, it requires an unflinching assessment of Shariah's incompatibility with the U.S. Constitution, and legal bars to Shariah-compliant petro-dollars now flowing into banking and business centers, into universities and media.

It absolutely requires weaning ourselves from Islamic oil -- what a concept -- and drilling far and widely for our own.

Halting the spread of Islamic law in the democratic West requires halting Islamic immigration. But there's another consideration.

On examining a photo of armed Taliban on an Afghan hill, it occurred to me that these men and others like them can't hurt us from their hilltops.

That is, what happens in Afghanistan stays in Afghanistan -- or Pakistan or Saudi Arabia -- if we (duh) impose wartime restrictions on travel from and to Shariah states.

But that cramps our freedom, critics will say. Well, so does standing in line to de-clothe and show our toothpaste because Hani Hanjour might be on the plane.

Funny kind of "freedom" we're now used to. And funny kind of war we fight to protect it -- a war for Shariah states abroad while a growing state of Shariah shrinks freedom at home.

The faster we extricate our military from the Islamic world, the faster we can figure out how to fight the real war, the Shariah war on the West.

Examiner Columnist Diana West is syndicated nationally by United Media and is the author of "The Death of the Grown-Up: How America's Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization."




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Gene44

Oct 4, 2009

Well Diana you have hit the nail on the head. The only problem is that our so called leaders refuse to do the right thing. It will come down to

 

PJM2413

Oct 4, 2009

Thank You Diana! First common sense article I've read lately.

We also need to bring our troops home from most of the military bases we have established in over 100 countries.

 

Oct 4, 2009

Shariah is inextricably entwined with fundamentalist Islam. Refusing to allow it in the West (fat chance with the moral rot in our Pol's) will only help those who flee here. There is no one leader for Islam. Each Imam can set up the rules for his followers and the spread of that religion as demanded by the Koran authorizes deceit and the sword when all else fails.

 

ladybug

Oct 4, 2009

Seems simple enough, but what about the women and girls who will be marginalized again?

If mothers had hope for the future could they affect the men out on the hilltops? Would their daughters be able to contribute to their society, government, and future if they weren't relegated to the scrap heap of abandonment again?

Yes, let's secure our borders and hope that the future will be secure with all the nuclear nations out there.

 

Krystyna

Oct 4, 2009

Diana West is quite right about Shariah law and the Taliban being the enemies of freedom and democracy. But it should be noted that Islamic extremeism is owed in part to the U.S. overthrow of the elected government of Iran in 1953 and to our neglect of Afghanistan, both in the 1950s by the Eisenhower administration. We shoukd also note that fundamentalist Christian extremism in this country is also inimical to freedom and democratic values.

 

Bernie In Omaha

Oct 4, 2009

Amen, so to speak. But, any government based on religious or superstitious beliefs is going to be the tyrant - read about the christian dark ages, it was catholic law that was the tyrant at that time.

 

Gyrene242

Oct 4, 2009

If our civilian leadership had the conceptual experience to manage a war in Afghanistan, it might be different. They do not. Our commanders and troops lack vital strategic support. The enemy has not beaten us, our own leadership is inadequate to the task and we need to pull back, regroup, clean House and Senate in 2010 at the ballot box, and reorient out efforts. We need to field as many diplomats as armed men. We need to secure our own position before we can help the rest of the world. It comes time to let the rest of the world fight its own battles until we have rid ourselves at the ballot box of those most detrimental to vitality and future of this nation of hard-working Americans.

 

Mad Monica

Oct 5, 2009

While I agree that shariah law has no place in this country, I think you're making a huge mistake calling for the pull out. Bin Laden clearly said one of the reasons they went ahead with 9/11 was our retreat in Somalia. Pulling out will leave millions vulnerable, go back on our promise to the people and make us look like the failures the new president wishes us to become.

 

Mad Monica

Oct 5, 2009

We've got to surge in Afghanistan, get things settled down so their people can take control and KEEP control. If we leave these people to be slaughtered we will be more deserving of another attack on us that we EVER were. We've given them "hope" that we'll help them, it would be truly evil to turn our back on them now.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Houston Rockets coach Rick Adelman, center, reacts with his staff Jack Sikma, left, and Elston Turner, right, to a called foul against his team as they play the Atlanta Hawks during the third quarter ...

Tracy McGrady says he's ready to play, Rockets believe it's still too soon after knee surgery

Tracy McGrady is eager to play. The Houston Rockets say he'll have to wait. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story