Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Meghan Cox Gurdon: The Wall separates Reagan from Obama

By: Meghan Cox Gurdon
Examiner Columnist
November 12, 2009

If you knew nothing more of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama than what each man said about freedom at Berlin's Brandenburg Gate, it would still be painfully obvious which of the two was a fierce defender of liberty, and which the avatar of toothless internationalist generalities.

At the height of the Cold War, President Reagan knew what he was about. The Soviet tyranny that held half of Europe in its grip had to be defeated. Reagan called it what it was: an evil empire. Worldly types snickered. Yet deep in Soviet forced labor camps, hearts leapt: Prisoners urgently tapped out in secret code to each other what Reagan had said, the bitter truth they knew that he had dared to utter.

Twenty-two years ago, Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate with the hated wall stretching out on either side of him. Addressing the boss of the communist bloc, Reagan said: "Come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate." The crowd roared. The president went on: "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"

Reagan had resisted efforts by his aides to tone down his remarks, to keep the presidential neck from sticking out too dangerously. No one knew if the wall would ever crumble, after all.

Reagan would have none of it - no temporizing, no accommodation. Two years later, he was vindicated as jubilant Germans smashed the wall to bits with sledgehammers.

This week, the world again turned its eyes to the Brandenburg Gate and saw a flat-screen American leader. The president who dropped everything to schmooze in Copenhagen in an attempt to win the Olympics for his pals in Chicago, the busy husband who makes time for ostentatious date nights with his well-dressed wife, could not be moved to visit Berlin to mark the 20th anniversary of the fall of the wall, a most extraordinary milestone in human freedom.

Instead, President Obama delivered a speech via video link so milky bland, so smothered in boilerplate, that he might have been speaking almost anywhere, about anything. "Even in the face of tyranny, people insisted that the world could change," he observed, not troubling to specify who, exactly, was so insistent.

"For Germans, the wall was a painful barrier between family and friends," the president said, as if the monstrous physical manifestation of the Iron Curtain was something on the scale of an awkward topic at the Thanksgiving table. "Family and friends?" How about between freedom and totalitarianism, between wealth-creating capitalism and police-state collectivism? Desperate East Germans died trying to scale that wall, shot by their own side.

Even here, Obama could not resist inserting his own awesome self: "Few would have foreseen on that day," he said, of Nov. 9, 1989, when people poured through gaps in the wall, "that a united Germany would be led by a woman from Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a man of African descent."

When Reagan spoke, political prisoners in communist countries knew the American defender was on their side, fearless and clear-eyed. The Russian dissident Natan Sharansky remembers the disbelieving joy that spread from man to man in the Siberian gulag where he was held, when Reagan used the phrase "evil empire." The lie had been exposed, Sharansky said: "It was one of the most important, freedom-affirming declarations, and we all instantly knew it. For us that was the moment that really marked the end for them, and the beginning for us."

As Obama orated via video, gesturing with one hand in a way that betrayed awkwardness with his material, one couldn't help but wonder what possible succor any imprisoned Iranian -- or American in an Iranian prison -- could take from his mealy banalities. What shivering North Korean convict or jailed Burmese activist could warm himself with platitudes like "the hope of a brighter day?"

The occasion was big. The crowds were big. Our president's words were shrunken and inadequate. At the Brandenburg Gate this week, it wasn't just the flat screen that made Obama seem two-dimensional.

Examiner Columnist Meghan Cox Gurdon is a former foreign correspondent and a regular contributor to the books pages of the Wall Street Journal. Her Examiner column appears on Thursday.




beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

netto

Nov 12, 2009

Thank you for articulating why I felt the President was being so disrespectful to history and the people who lived through it. It seems like he just doesn't understand the significance of the end of the communist empire. It makes me wonder about his perceptions of what is/was really important.

 

ggordon

Nov 12, 2009


Reagan was our last great world leader.

We have quickly discovered that Obama is no leader. Of course anyone with an open mind knew. He might make a pretty good community leader, in the right community.
Obama is a punk... especially after seeing him whooping it up just prior to giving his first statement about the terrorist act at Ft. Hood. Whooping it up - then transitioning into the statement. What a punk...

 

Mad Monica

Nov 12, 2009

What a great post. You are so correct. It's humiliating to see this man jet around the world making apologies right and left for actions that have freed millions. His behavior on this day says much about who and what he is. And it isn't good.

 

Sesara

Nov 13, 2009

Why don't you just canonize St. Reagan? Your language speaks of your bias here. Any reason you wingers can find to be outraged against Obama is seized, no matter how unreasonable it appears.

You should have written a more concise article: Reagan = godlike hero, Obama = anti-freedom socialist. That would have saved us all from this dribble.

 

http://coldfury.com

Nov 13, 2009

"It seems like he just doesn't understand the significance of the end of the communist empire."

Oh, he understands it very well -- as the defeat for his ideology it was. It's abundantly clear he's been on the wrong side of the Wall his entire life. Once you realize that, everything he says and does makes perfect sense.

 

Manuel

Nov 13, 2009

Wow, the Reagan shills are up early this morning. This is equivalent to a prepubescent girl gushing over her favorite celebrity. Pathetic.

 

Nov 13, 2009

Great post and great observations. I think on so many levels this one event encapsulates the man and presidency of Barack Obama.

He makes a last minute trip to Copenhagen to lobby for the Olympics (at obscene cost to taxpayers). But he WOULDN'T make time for this historic anniversary... something that should have been planned out from the beginning of the year.

 

Mike Constitution

Nov 13, 2009

Sesara and Manuel, like most bitter left-wingers, cannot defend their positions intellectually so they attack their political betters personally. The liberal motto should be "Defending the Indefensible Until It Kills YOU". If you clowns are so upset at millions of people being freed from slavery by the efforts of a brave American President, head on down to Hugo's Venezuela or over to Ahnadenijad's Iran. There are still plenty of totalitarian paradises for you stew in.

 

CA

Nov 13, 2009

I love this article for its symbolism, the flesh and blood Reagan, 100% committed, vs. the flat screen Obama, clearly not... Reagan's staff worries over the public relations problem with the intended audience if he makes the statement and the effect it had on an unintended audience when he did utter the words. Only one man in the story acted as a leader should, and that man was Reagan. Thanks for the article.

 

Toonary

Nov 13, 2009

I notice that ObamaLand is freely bashing Reagan (whom Obama praised over Clinton) and anyone who admires Reagan for his Berlin speech... but I found no ObamaLand mention of the major leadership faux pas that Obama made by not showing up for the 20yr Berlin Wall anniversary... especially when compared to his witless trip to Copenhagen to promote Chicago. Where in the scheme of things does Obama represent the best of America? Answer that you ObamaLand minions.

 

jack carlson

Nov 13, 2009

Yes, in order to take appropriate action, it is necessary to call things what they really are! And, stop pretending they are something else. Let's see how long it takes for Obama to call Islam the world's largest Satanic cult.

 

mike

Nov 13, 2009

It must hurt to be an Obamunist. I mean if no hope and change now with him and the current huge majorities then when?

 

anonymous

Nov 13, 2009

YAWN. A real snoozer by another righteous-righty desparate to see Obama defeated. It is sad to see how far the right (a.k.a Republicans) and the Wall Street Journal have sunk. As if fair and balanced ever existed at the WSJ. It like Fox News is just another tool of the Republican party and suffers from the same integrity problem. Shame on you Meghan.

 

Guy Jones

Nov 13, 2009

President Obama's abstaining from attending the Berlin Wall anniversary celebration was disgraceful and embarrassing. Whatever his motivation -- egotism, hostility to Reagan, or plain indifference -- it's simply stunning that he could find time in schedule to lobby the IOC, but not to pay tribute to a bellwether event of the 20th century, a milestone event in the triumph of freedom over totalitarianism that heralded the fall of the Soviet Union and its hold over Eastern Europe. This was an event beyond partisanship. He should have been there.

 

larry07601

Nov 13, 2009

You know,Meghan,
there was recently a comparison of Reagan in 1982 and Obama now...
~ both had 10% unemployment
~ both in a Recession, etc.

And yet, Reagan recovered; so why can't that Socialist Weasle now in the WH do the same?

The BIG difference is...Reagan didn't burn us:

Obama burned us


...with the Bailouts, The Stimulus waste of a Trillion, and now pushing a Socialist solution for our Healthcare.

Reagan could recover...Obama can't.

He's stuck in a socialist swamp of his own creation, and NO amount of repudiation can pul him out of it. He's gotta go.

The Stimulus was a "must do" remember February? The Stimulus was the beginning of all this anger.

To say NOW that the "Health Care needs to passed, it will redeem us" is such bull - totally ignoring the Stimulus' lasting anger - and a further reason this President is irredeemable, unsaveable, and unsavory.

Lar

 

Indonesian Jelly Doughnut

Nov 14, 2009

Reagan's challenge to" tear down this wall" provided the needed impetus to the speech Kennedy gave a generation before in Berlin.A master stroke-and he is all but ignored by this charlatan enamored by his reflection.

 

jack

Nov 14, 2009

larry 07601,

Reagan recovered because he was right. Obama, not so much.

Chemotherapy will make you feel worse, then cure you. Poison will also make you feel worse, then kill you.

 

Ed

Nov 17, 2009

Merkel's walk across the bridge with Gorbachev at the anniversary ceremony is the beginning of the end of the Reagan myth that "conservatives" have created. The Germans know that it was Gorby who brought change through an iron commitment to reform in the USSR. His refusal to authorize the GDR to use force to keep the wall standing was the key. Reagan's entire role was nothing more than ceasing his belligerence and bomb-throwing when he trusted Gorby and after the Able Archer incident scared the crap out of him. At the time, "conservatives" vilified Reagan for cooperating with Gorby. Now "conservatives" claim credit for Gorby's achievements. What gall!

The myth of Reagan's importance will inevitably die away, because it is historically false. Obama still has a chance to end up as a far more significant figure. Time is on Obama's side, not Reagan's.

 

JKM

Nov 18, 2009

Ed, you live in a dream world. Why did Gorbachev feel compelled to introduce reforms? It was brought about largely by international pressure, tuned to fever pitch by people like Reagan, Thatcher and John Paul II (and Lech Walesa). If it weren't for this pressure, "Glasnost" and "Perestroika" and the fall of the Berlin Wall would have never happened under Gorbachev's watch. Remember, Gorbachev is considered a failure and a national disgrace in Russia and the pro-Russian former Soviet republics. He's their Jimmy Carter (or Obama), the man who lost the Soviet Union.

Obama is the personification of insignificance, an empty suit full of platitudes.

 

JKM

Nov 18, 2009

One thing Ed got correct is that many 'conservatives' claim credit they don't deserve for the fall of the Wall, but he's wrong about the reasons... The existence of the Soviet Union and Communism played well at election time for many Republicans, and deep down there were many who didn't exactly want the Soviet Union to disappear as a rival. Legions of academicians and so-called "Soviet Experts" insisted the Soviet Union would last forever and that the Wall was a permanent fixture of the political landscape. Their jobs depended on it, and they advised the President accordingly. In the end, the "experts" had to re-write their resumes once the USSR collapsed. Thankfully, Reagan did not listen to these policy wonks in his administration, but instead trusted his hunch that the Soviet empire was built on economic quicksand and could be bankrupted.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story