Gregory Kane

[Print]  [Email]        

Gregory Kane: Memo to the whining Left

By: Gregory Kane
August 10, 2009

 

Memo to the whining Left
 
By Gregory Kane
 
How do we deal with people like those of the Whining Left who, even after Sonia Sotomayor has been confirmed as a Supreme Court justice, are still complaining?
 
So there they were, as late as Wednesday of last week, grousing that their woman was abused during the confirmation hearings, and that “right-wing” radio talk-show hosts were saying horrible things about her.
 
I was a guest on a local radio show in Baltimore – the station is located on a college campus, so that means the viewpoint is left-wing, not right-wing – and apparently one of the complaints is that one of the senators said to Sotomayor that “you have some ‘splaining to do.”
 
Well, my stars! This didn’t strike me as exactly a Joseph Conrad “Oh, the horror! The horror!” moment. Truth is, I’ve used the phrase myself, in a column about one Andres Alonso, the superintendent and chief executive officer of Baltimore’s public schools. Alonso is a Cuban-American, and no sooner had the column appeared than I got the e-mail, from one of the testier members of the Whining Left.
 
By now, most conservatives are aware that it’s a doctrine of these folks that all conservatives are, by definition, racist. This is the flip side of their rule that blacks and other “people of color” can’t be racist because they have no power.
 
So the e-mailer, a woman, accused me of having anti-Latino bias because I said that Alonso “had some ‘splaining to do.” I reminded her of where the phrase came from: Cuban-American actor Desi Arnaz, playing the Cuban-American character Ricky Ricardo, on the classic 1950s television show “I Love Lucy.”
 
There was nothing “anti-Latino” about the saying; in fact, it has now become part of standard American lingo like “Where’s the beef?” or “Hold the phone, Andy” or “What ‘choo talkin’ bout, Willis?”
 
And I did some checking: I’d used the exact phrase a few years earlier, before Alonso became CEO of Baltimore’s schools, about all the non-Latino folks who run Baltimore’s school system. When it comes to public education, the people in charge of Baltimore schools do, indeed, have much “splaining to do.”
 
So the charge of anti-Latino bigotry against the senator who said Sotomayor had “some ‘splaining to do” simply won’t wash. Because the truth is she still does. Let’s review who’s just been confirmed to a lifetime appointment as a justice to the highest court in the land: A woman who has indicated that she has a problem with white males, who ruled in one case that discriminating against them is the law of the land.
 
And she is on record as saying, before one of those left-wing audiences on a college campus where she thought no moderate or conservative ears were listening, that policy is made from the judicial bench, not in state legislatures or the Congress or the executive branch of government.
 
Whatever else happened to Sotomayor during her confirmation hearing, she at least came through the process with her reputation intact. I’m not sure the same can be said about Robert Bork, and I know it can’t be said about Justice Clarence Thomas.
 
Bork didn’t even get confirmed; in fact, senators raked him over the coals in his confirmation hearings. The reason? In Bork’s judicial philosophy, justices and judges do not make policy; their powers are constitutionally limited and they should show what’s been called “judicial restraint.”
 
Of course, that meant Bork believed that the Roe v. Wade decision, where seven justices overturned laws in those states that outlawed abortion, was wrong. Equally wrong were the decisions that set the precedent for Roe: Griswold v. Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. Bairdt.
 
We all know what happened to Thomas: Lawyer Anita Hill, who used to work with him, emerging from the woodwork at the 11th hour with charges of sexual harassment against Thomas. With absolutely no one to confirm her allegations against Thomas, Hill was allowed to go before the nation and accuse the man of vile and despicable conduct. The reputation of being a sexual harasser taints Thomas to this day.
 
 Compared to what happened to Bork and Thomas – the term “to be borked,” like “you have some ‘splaining to do” is also now part of the American lexicon – Sotomayor got off easy. Someone needs to send that memo to members of the Whining Left.
 
Examiner columnist Gregory Kane is an award-winning journalist who lives in Baltimore.
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Aug 10, 2009

Oh boy. You talk about the left "still complaining" and of course omit the racist slurs by the right like calling her a racist and the overblown wise Latino statement. And you are "still complaining" about Borke and Thomas so what's the point of this article? Its this a vain attempt to get back the Hispanic vote. If so, its too late. I can't understand your mission with this right wing newspaper. YOU go “some ‘splaining to do”

 

Greg

Aug 10, 2009

Oh boy. You talk about the left "still complaining" and of course omit the racist slurs by the right like calling her a racist and the overblown wise Latino statement. And you are "still complaining" about Borke and Thomas so what's the point of this article? Its this a vain attempt to get back the Hispanic vote. If so, its too late. I can't understand your mission with this right wing newspaper. YOU go “some ‘splaining to do”

 

Derrick

Aug 10, 2009

Mr Kane, you got some nerve talking about whinning. You cry everyday about how bad we liberals treat conservatives. It like a broken record. In this very aritcle you are complaining about how Judges Bork and Thomas were treated. Give me a break. Earth to Gregory Kane. Judge Bork got Borked because he was Bork :)

 

ranger

Aug 10, 2009

Brother Greg-- Keep on keeping on. I get a big kick reading the comments from your critics which can be summarized as follows: "Shut up. You are advancing an idea that contradicts me, therefore you have no right to speak. Furthermore you are not actually black."

 

BillG

Aug 10, 2009

Wow. One simply can't argue with comments like those made to this article. How could one, since there's nothing substantive in them. Completely emotional, containing not a single fact. Personally, I blame the public schools, in which people like these are taught to think like children. That how one feels is of vastly more importance than how one reasons. It doesn't work like that in the real world, where I wouldn't even consider hiring people for whom logic is not familiar enough to be thought of as a second language.

 

southernyankee

Aug 10, 2009

I am a 59 year old white male who grew up in the projects of the Bronx NY. I myself are deeply offended that she would denigrate me solely on my gender and race and suggest that she would make a better decision than I would. A valid concern on my part since I shared her "experience". BS

 

MMM

Aug 10, 2009

Latina, Yes. Wise, not so much. I know wise Latinas, and Sotomayor is not a wise Latina. Wise Latinas run businesses, employ themselves and others, sit on executive committees and boards of corporations and community organizations -- and have more sense than the woman just given a seat on the highest judiciary body in the country.

 

Greg

Aug 10, 2009

southernyankee

Aug 10, 2009

I am a 59 year old white male who grew up in the projects of the Bronx NY. I myself are deeply offended that she would denigrate me solely on my gender and race and suggest that she would make a better decision than I would. A valid concern on my part since I shared her "experience". BS
******************************
If you grew up in the projects you would not so thin skined. As Joan Rivers said, "oh grow up".

 

John Smith

Aug 10, 2009

Let's deal with FACTS!.......
Most of these comments are plain bigots with absolutely NO FACTS!

The FACTS are that Sotomayor qualified for the job otherwise she wouldn't be nominated in the first place and she would not have made it through these WALL of sick bigots.

GET THE FACTS, You IGNORANT FOOLS!

From a Latin person

 

Steve-O

Aug 10, 2009

So, spouting off:

"From a Latin person"

Makes you the ultimate authority, Mr. Smith? It's people like you that make my life much more annoying as I must tell my son why the world is so backwards.

First, the only qualifications the exalted one was looking for was a spanish last name and a female. In her own words she speaks as the antithesis of a judge. No matter. She is overturned many times by the court that she is nominated to. No matter. She contradicts most of her record and all of her words in testimony. No matter. The ones who don't act like bidets to her inevitability are demonized.

Apptopriately surnamed, unfortunately gendered reader. Of course, I don't take my hispanicness to mean I know it all.

 

Joshua Sands

Aug 11, 2009

Of course she is a racist, she hardly tries to hide it. If a white man had said what she said he would have been hung by his thumbs. But for a "wise Latina" it's just fine. The double standard makes me sick... and so do the Republicans who voted for this activist piece of garbage.

 

StepIntoTheLight

Aug 11, 2009

Mr. Kane, thanks for this article. Our country is currently being run by the Whining Left, who find comfort in degrading the opposition simply because they will not drink the Kool-Aid of the liberal mainstrea media in the tank for this corrupt Administration demanding government control over our lives and moral bankruptcy evident in Washington today. We would rather side with our Founding Fathers, who spoke of individual freedom, liberty, justice, which is being destroyed by Obama on a daily basis.

 

Greg

Aug 11, 2009

Yeah, StepIntoTheLight

I long for the days of Bush. We should not comfort in opposition - except at town hall meetings were freedom of speech is not allowed. This newspaper is a trip. I mean, just one sided propaganda. Opposing views are not allowed.

 

Aug 11, 2009

Uncle Tom is a pejorative term for a black person who is perceived by others as behaving in a subservient manner to white authority figures, or as seeking ingratiation with them by way of unnecessary accommodation.[1] The term comes from the title character of American writer Harriet Beecher Stowe's 1851 novel Uncle Tom's Cabin.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Suspended NASCAR Sprint Cup driver Jeremy Mayfield chats with attendees during a public auction Friday, Nov. 20, 2009, at his Catawba, N.C. property. As NASCAR prepares to crown a champion in its fina...

Long way from the track, suspended Mayfield holds large auction to help pay for court fight

Jeremy Mayfield sat in the back of his large barn Friday morning about 800 miles from where NASCAR's season-ending weekend was kicking off. Several hundred people surrounded him, listening intently as a fast-speaking auctioneer sold dozens of items. Full story

Nation

EPA: Uranium in Nev. wells; whistleblower, preacher's wife helped crack toxic mining mystery

Peggy Pauly lives in a robin-egg blue, two-story house not far from acres of onion fields that make the northern Nevada air smell sweet at harvest time. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story