James Carafano

[Print]  [Email]        

James Jay Carafano: Obama, Gates are gutting America’s defense industry

By: James Carafano
Examiner Columnist
August 30, 2009

It isn’t easy to put U.S. defenses back on track after they’ve endured a season of neglect. Gen. William Snow found that out firsthand.

Snow’s job, when he arrived in Washington in the World War I era, was to direct the buildup of artillery for the Allied Expeditionary Force. He thought his office should have stationery reflecting the importance of the task. His request was rejected. Rather than fund this extravagance, it was suggested the general purchase a rubber stamp to mark his correspondence.

Snow had joined a War Department completely unprepared to fight a war. The Army hadn’t been used to buying much of anything since the Civil War. It had forgotten how.

Nor was there much to buy. The United States had virtually no defense industrial base. When America entered the war, Congress handed out unprecedented contracts for artillery, tanks and planes. The war was over before U.S. industry could deliver any of them. Doughboys went into battle riding British tanks, piloting French planes and firing artillery made by their allies.

America in 2009 is returning to the 19th century, a world where America will be incapable of producing the instruments needed to defend America. Worse, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’ defense policies are pumping steroids into the speed of that decline.

Both houses of Congress have passed the defense authorization bill, giving their rubber stamp to dismantling the defense industrial base. Last week, President Barack Obama made a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars cheerleading the decision.

The White House has couched many of these defense cuts in rhetoric that makes them sound like smart business decisions — axing unneeded weapons and killing costly programs. We’ve seen massive cuts to everything from missile defense to how many ships and planes America needs.

The truth is that the administration is more interested in budget slashing than smart buying. And its ill-advised cuts are endangering operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. The proof of this is simple. They are cutting programs and replacing them with ... nothing. The Pentagon plan is to simply ignore future needs or else push the decision to buy new equipment far into the future, when paying for new planes, combat vehicles, missile defenses and ships will be somebody else’s problem.

What Washington has not explained is how it’s going to sustain a defense industrial base when it doesn’t buy anything. Today, defense purchases account for about 10 percent of the nation’s industrial output. In a decade, that production could virtually vanish.

In fairness, Obama did not invent this problem. Washington has not seriously worried about the industrial base since the end of the Cold War. While Gates’ cuts have been trumpeted from the Pentagon’s E-Ring, folks forget that his predecessor, Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, slashed about 100 procurement programs.

The problem is that neither administration really considered the effect of these decisions on the capacity of the American industrial base to support any future Pentagon strategy. A recent study by the Aerospace Industries Association found that some of our defense sectors were already on life support. Regardless of any strategy the Pentagon might pick, the industrial base for developing rotary-wing systems (like combat helicopters), long-range bombers and some space assets is now so crippled that companies would have a difficult time responding to new requirements, even if the military decided today that it wanted a lot more new stuff.

There is only one answer. The Pentagon should immediately start a sustained program of modernizing its military capabilities.

Otherwise, the defense industrial base is going to dry up and blow away. With it will go more than just high-paying jobs and technical innovation. We’ll be saying goodbye to America’s capacity to defend itself at a reasonable cost. And that’s simply unacceptable.


Examiner Columnist James Jay Carafano is a senior research fellow for national security at The Heritage Foundation




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

ddc

Aug 31, 2009

Obama's goal is to create a socialist-communist government. By destroying our line of defence is taking place right now.Just look at his czar system,they answer only to Obama and are not held accountable to the American public.Impeach Obama and his cronies now ! They work for the people.Take back our Constitution now.God Bless America, God Save America!

 

lol

Aug 31, 2009

Yes blame it all on Obama forget about the fact Bush and his pals juiced the military funds for all they were worth. Lets just forget how private military funding was being used to blow up salvagable vehicles and cover the costs of $6 cans of Coke produced in Iraq. We can also ignore the hundreds of SUVs purchased from FORD at $80k a pop which now sit in the desert and have never been used once.

You people wonder why America is broke?

Ask your good old boy GW Bush.

 

Aug 31, 2009

Please Dr. Carfafano, keep fighting the good fight for us spreading the facts. Perhaps it will do good if some liberals open their minds and understand the dangers were are in. Thanks!

 

Prexis

Aug 31, 2009

So our defense budget is only 10% of our overall budget, and our present course will require future generations to pick up the cost of new planes and ships! Wow!

Of course, Mr. Carafano doesn't tell us how much of our budget we should be spending on defense. What does he want, 15%, 20%? We already spend more than the rest of the world combined. Maybe we just not getting enough bang for the buck?

I don't see much of a difference to those future citizens who are going to pay for all this immediate largess. We're facing a larger-than-ever budget deficit already, so, i suppose, in Carafano's mind what's another couple of hundred billion?

Of course, were we to wait a while, we might actually be able to buy more advanced hardware, but now that wouldn't help the existing military-industrial complex, would it?

 

Aug 31, 2009

Heritage has advocated spending a minimum of 4% GDP on defense. This is not as much a question of what YOU would like to spend money on. This insane Govt has managed to spend $3 billion on cash for clunkers. Starting at $1, then adding $2 billion more. Now they have CUT nearly $2 billion from missile defense.

Back to my point, no where in the Constitution does it tell Congress and the President to buy car companies and start a welfare state. It does however charge the Government to "provide for the common defense."

Carafano has the Constitution of the United States in his corner backing his argument. Those doubting him just have their feelings behind them.

 

Paul M.

Aug 31, 2009

Heritage has advocated spending a minimum of 4% GDP on defense. This is not as much a question of what YOU would like to spend money on. This insane Govt has managed to spend $3 billion on cash for clunkers. Starting at $1, then adding $2 billion more. Now they have CUT nearly $2 billion from missile defense.

Back to my point, no where in the Constitution does it tell Congress and the President to buy car companies and start a welfare state. It does however charge the Government to "provide for the common defense."

Carafano has the Constitution of the United States in his corner backing his argument. Those doubting him just have their feelings behind them.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story