Special Editorial Reports

[Print]  [Email]        

Study predicts millions of lost jobs under Card Check

By: Kevin Mooney
Editorial Staff Writer
March 6, 2009

America’s unemployment rate could top 10 percent under the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), if it boosts union membership as much as some supporters have predicted, according to a new economic study.

Every three percentage point gain in union membership would be accompanied by a one percentage point increase in the unemployment rate the following year, said Dr. Anne Layne-Farrar , who conducted the study.

She is an economist with LECG, a non-partisan Chicago-based economic consulting group.

Proponents of EFCA say union membership would grow by 1.5 million members every year over the next 10 to 15 years under EFCA.

But EFCA opponents point to the new study to back their argument that EFCA will hurt the economy.

“Job losses attributable to the passage of the employee free choice act in that respect would be equal to the entire population of the city of Boston,” said Phil Miscamarra, a legal counsel with the Alliance to Save Main Street Jobs.

A 1.5 million member increase would “lead to the loss of 600,000 jobs by the end of the following year,” he said.

Layne-Farrar’s study entitled: “An Empirical Assessment of the Employee Free Choice Act: The Economic Implications” concludes that EFCA’s economic impact would be felt within a year of becoming law.

Unemployment could rise anywhere from one-and-a-half to three percentage points by January 2010 if EFCA passes this year, Layne-Farrar said.

The Employee Free Choice Act (or  Card Check) passed in the House last March but fell short of the 60 votes required for cloture in the Senate. Under current law, workers are guaranteed a federally supervised secret ballot election when formation of a new union is disputed.

Section Two of the proposed Card Check bill says when the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) “finds that a majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for bargaining has signed valid authorizations designating the individual or labor organization specified in the petition as their bargaining representative … the Board shall not direct an election but shall certify the individual or labor organization as the representative described in subsection A.”

House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-CA, is the main sponsor of the measure in the House. Main Senate sponsor is Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-MA.
 

Kevin Mooney is an editorial staff writer for The Washington Examiner.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

here we go again

Mar 6, 2009

Mr. Mooney: Are you deliberately omitting parts to try and fool the people reading the Examiner? Section 2 of the Employee Free Choice Act states: "SEC. 2. STREAMLINING UNION CERTIFICATION. (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 159(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 8 ‘‘(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, ..." Section 9 (c) B of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) states: "If the Board finds upon the record of such hearing that such a question of representation exists, it shall direct an election by secret ballot and shall certify the results thereof." Section 9 (c) B will not be erased therefore the employees have the choice between secret ballot elections and card check.

 

another study

Mar 6, 2009

The economists’ statement, which was spearheaded by Harvard economist Richard Freeman, MIT’s Frank Levy, and Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute, notes that even though millions of American workers have said they want a union to represent them in the workplace, the current system overseen by the National Labor Relations Board most often thwarts that desire. It describes today’s process as “drawn out and acrimonious, with management campaigning fiercely to deter unionization, sometimes to the extent of violating the labor law.

 

more from study

Mar 6, 2009

"The problem is that the election process overseen by the National Labor Relations Board has become drawn out and acrimonious, with management campaigning fiercely to deter unionization, sometimes to the extent of violating the labor law. Union sympathizers are routinely threatened or even fired, and they have little effective recourse under the law. Even when workers overcome this pressure and vote for a union, they are unable to obtain contracts one-third of the time due to management resistance."

 

again, not my opinion, theirs

Mar 6, 2009

Even they say it would be the choice of the employees to have a secret ballot election. "To remedy this situation, the Congress is considering the Employee Free Choice Act. This act would accomplish three things: It would give workers the choice of using majority sign-up-- a simple, established procedure in which workers sign cards to indicate their support for a union – or staging an NLRB election; it triples damages for employers who fire union supporters or break other labor laws; and it creates a process to ensure that newly unionized employees have a fair shot at obtaining a first contract by calling for arbitration after 120 days of unsuccessful bargaining."

 

again, not my opinion, theirs

Mar 6, 2009

Even they say it would be the choice of the employees to have a secret ballot election. "To remedy this situation, the Congress is considering the Employee Free Choice Act. This act would accomplish three things: It would give workers the choice of using majority sign-up-- a simple, established procedure in which workers sign cards to indicate their support for a union – or staging an NLRB election; it triples damages for employers who fire union supporters or break other labor laws; and it creates a process to ensure that newly unionized employees have a fair shot at obtaining a first contract by calling for arbitration after 120 days of unsuccessful bargaining."

 

Mar 6, 2009

Dr. Layne-Farar may have written a paper but it is biased. She herself is a biased conservative who goes on conservative talk shows. Her latest gig was on Ed Morressey. On the other hand, the economists from the pdf I posted are from the Brookings Institute, Harvard, MIT, Rutgers, Boston U, New York University, UMass, University of Maryland, Stanford, Center for Economic Research and Policy, and more.

 

Thanks JD

Mar 6, 2009

This was posted by JD on the other op-ed regarding the biased study: ""Layne-Farrar works for LECG, a NON-PARTISAN 'economic consulting' group in Chicago" BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! NON-PAETISAN, THAT'S A GOOD ONE!!!! Bottom of page 1 footnotes reads: "Financial support from The Alliance to Save Main Street Jobs is gratefully acknowledged". Hmmm. Who or what is "The Alliance to Save Main Street Jobs" you ask?: About the Alliance to Save Main Street Jobs: The Alliance is chaired by HR Policy Association and includes the American Hotel and Lodging Association, the Associated Builders and Contractors, The International Council of Shopping Centers, the Real Estate Roundtable, the Retail Industry Leaders Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. NON-PARTISAN...BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ...STOP, YOU'RE KILLING ME!!!! ...BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

 

I believe

Mar 6, 2009

if you want to build the middle class again, unions need to be in the equation. I just heard on the radio that economists believe the only way out of this recession is for consumer spending. Union members earn better wages and the logic going along with the more you make the more you spend. That would cause the economy to prosper. Which would cause employers to put people to work again. The time from 1946 to 1970, when our economy was the most prosperous, union density was at its highest.

 

RWE

Mar 6, 2009

Considering the past comments, I guess the higher union membership in the state of Michigan would explain their recent economic successes.

 

adam

Mar 6, 2009

http://www.fightcardcheck.com/

 

jim

Mar 7, 2009

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/2009/02/just-say-no-to-employee-free-choice-act.html

 

RAVASKABAH

Mar 8, 2009

This article is so full of mumble-jumble, I didn't understand what one thing had to do with another. This site is just like the Republican party, slight-of-hand discussion about issues. All of you are just Limbaugh zombies. I hope this party fails for the next 50 years!

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Graphic surveys NFL players concerning concussions

NFL players union opposes Goodell's call for players to report on teammates' concussions

The NFL Players Association opposes commissioner Roger Goodell's call for players to tell their teams' medical staffs if they think a teammate shows symptoms of a concussion. Full story

Economy

Tenn. judge finds law allowing guns in bars is unconstitutional, 'fraught with ambiguity'

Tennessee's new law allowing people with handgun permits to be armed in bars and restaurants that serve alcohol is unconstitutionally vague, a judge ruled on Friday. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story