Politics

[Print]  [Email]        

‘Card check’ bill on the way

By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
March 10, 2009

On Tuesday, Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., above, and Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., are expected to introduce the legislation in the Senate and House, respectively. And according to leadership aides, it will be up to the Senate to pass the bill before the House considers it. (AP photo)

House and Senate Democrats will introduce a bill to ease rules on labor union elections as soon as Tuesday, thrusting Congress into one of the biggest battles ever between business and labor and putting moderates in the hot seat as no other piece of legislation has this year.

On Monday, investment guru Warren Buffett announced on CNBC that he is opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, which would allow unions to bypass the secret ballot and require only signatures on a petition to organize a company’s work force.
“I think the secret ballot is pretty important in this country,” Buffett said.

Democrats, including President Barack Obama, had pledged last year to pass the bill quickly for the labor unions that helped them win big last November.

But three months into the new administration and the new Congress,  Democratic lawmakers are watching the issue “fester,” as one Senate aide put it, while they struggle to find enough support to pass it.

Business groups and other opponents, who call the vote-by-petition practice “card check,” have grown more vocal in their opposition, while the unions have intensified their pressure on Congress to get the bill to Obama's desk.

On Tuesday, Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., are expected to introduce the legislation in the Senate and House, respectively. And according to leadership aides, it will be up to the Senate to pass the bill before the House considers it.
But Democrats have indicated that so far, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., lacks the 60 votes needed to bring the bill to floor.
Union officials say congressional leaders assure them that they can round up the votes, but their success depends on some hypotheticals.

Democrats control 58 votes in the Senate, including Kennedy, whose attendance has been unpredictable this year because of his battle with brain cancer. Democrats are counting on Kennedy to be well enough to vote. They are also hoping that Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., will cross party lines and support a vote to move the bill to the floor, as he did during the last unsuccessful attempt to pass the bill in 2007.

But Specter is facing a tough re-election battle that just got harder last week when Patrick Toomey signaled he will challenge Specter in the Republican primary. Specter beat Toomey by fewer than 2 percentage points in a 2004 primary and Toomey vigorously opposes the bill, which could force Specter to do the same.

Reid must also worry about his fellow Democrats, several of whom have indicated they are undecided and want to put off a vote until the economy recovers.

Undecided Democratic senators include Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, both of Arkansas, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and newcomer Michael Bennet of Colorado. 

“Senator Nelson feels that the economic issues before Congress are awfully important,” Nelson spokesman Jake Thompson said. “He would prefer not to see it up for debate soon.”

Union officials say they understand it will be a struggle.

“But with the support of President Obama and Democrats in the House and Senate, we feel confident we'll get there,” said Christy Setzer, a spokeswoman for the Service Employees International Union.


sferrechio@dcexaminer.com



beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Stunned by Stupidity

Mar 10, 2009

This so called "Free Choice" bill will be the end of fair business practices as we know them. If employees really want to unionize, then the effort will survive a secret ballot. Having been through this twice now with the SEIU, my workplace has rejected their WORTHLESS representation three times in the past twenty years. They offer NOTHING to the employee except for layoffs and lower wages, and then of course they take their cut. They are shameless and the very idea of this bill is criminal, and ANTI worker, not pro! Another payback the Dems owe the Unions, that's all it is! Disgraceful!

 

Joe Kirkup

Mar 10, 2009

This just amazes me. The secret ballot is at the very foundation of our democratic system, it is the only way to avoid having voters intimidated by either side of an issue. Of course intimidation is what unions are all about, have seen that first hand, but for any politician to go on the record as opposing the secret ballot is just plain staggering. There is an absolute stampeed of people going to buy firearms in this country, it's easy to see why. When the secret ballot is gone so is your liberty. Oh, and for you union thugs who don't like what I have to say you can google me and get my address. I'll be waiting.

 

ryan2partymyth

Mar 10, 2009

Why not make all voting public then? This helps people be honest how?

 

who's the thug?

Mar 10, 2009

Joe: You sound like more of a thug than the union people I know. You talk about firearms and then invite people to look up your address and you'll be waiting? Waiting to do what? Shoot someone?

 

At least

Mar 10, 2009

the examiner didn't start off this time with their usual phrase about the Employee Free Choice Act. Maybe they read the bill and found out that the Employee Free Choice Act amends the National Labor Relations Act and that the EFCA absolutely does not take away a secret ballot election if the employees want one.

 

NLRA

Mar 10, 2009

National Labor Relations Act - Section 9 (c) B states " If the Board finds upon the record of such hearing that such a question of representation exists, it shall direct an election by secret ballot and shall certify the results thereof."

 

EFCA

Mar 10, 2009

Section 2: "SEC. 2. STREAMLINING UNION CERTIFICATION. (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 159(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, ..."

 

Currently

Mar 10, 2009

"Section 9 (c) 0f the NLRA has 5 subsections. The Employee Free Choice Act would add a section 6 but as stated in Section 2, "‘‘(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section,..." As a result, this act gives employees the choice between a secret ballot election as stated in Section 9 (c) B or to use card check if the Employee Free Choice Act is enacted."

 

Bunch of Hooey

Mar 10, 2009

I am stunned by yours. Just because you are anti-union does not give you the right to spread lies, i.e. "They offer NOTHING to the employee except for layoffs and lower wages, and then of course they take their cut." I don't know where you get your info but typically unions offer stability and better wages and benefits.

 

All in all

Mar 10, 2009

It's a good thing for the employees and reflects the intention of the NLRA.

 

Anony Mous

Mar 10, 2009

This is nothing but a payback to the unions who elected all the dim bulbs to Congress and the White House.

 

TESS

Mar 10, 2009

We want no parts of the "Union Card bill We are the American people and we do not want that bill anyway, anytime, ever!

 

jim

Mar 10, 2009

Say yes to the Employee Free Choice Act. I am an American too and the Americans I know want this bill and the choice it offers.

 

America the Great

Mar 10, 2009

The bottom line is this bill is good for American workers. It is needed and reflects the original intention of the National Labor Relations Act. The Employee Free Choice Act will allow employees a choice between secret ballot elections and recognizing authorization cards. It sets a timeline to achieve an agreement and puts teeth into the Act by enacting financial penalties for Unfair Labor Practices.

 

Ron

Mar 10, 2009

Unblievable, Washington politics at its worst. Funny how nothing changes. Give the unions what they want, no matter what the outcome, so they will pay their political graft to us for more power. Where is the Change you promised. I know it will only change when it benefits us. Otherwise to bad. How come Washington never!!! gets it. And the tax payer always gets it in the BACK.

 

Need Clarity

Mar 10, 2009

What is the supposed advantage of this new law? No one has explained what will be gained with the loss of confidentiality- this lends itself to mob mentality

 

to need clarity

Mar 10, 2009

Did you not read any of the comments on here or did you see card check and just ramble on paper whatever came to you? There is also a web site posted that will help provide the clarity you desire.

 

amazing

Mar 10, 2009

If unions only represent 12% of the workforce, why are a lot of posters and oped writers of the examiner so scared of this bill?

 

Ms Priss

Mar 10, 2009

I must say ignorance is bliss out here. Anytime you see the US Chamber, the GOP and big business opposing this bill, you know the bill must be in favor of the American people. And for all of you who don't want unions, be content with the low wages and fewer benefits these same companies will continue to offer you. Haven't you noticed wages and benefits have been going down since President Reagan began busting unions in 1980. Yet, you continued to be fooled by the GOP and other organizations wanting cheat labor. Soon you will be paid less than $1/hour like in China, Mexico and India. Let me guess, most of you are low information republicans. Go figure, arrogant and ignorant Americans.

 

Tom

Mar 10, 2009

There is No free choice about this Bill. It only favors the labor unions and the thugs that run them and the corrupt politicians that will sell their soul and this country just to get a vote. VOTE NO on this phoney bill.

 

AT

Mar 10, 2009

For those who say, erroneously, that unions are the only means the American worker has to succeed, I ask you to consider those who work in Right to Work states. I don't hear them complaining. Freedom is just that, the God-given right to choose without fear of reprisal.

 

ConLawgs

Mar 10, 2009

I'm with Joe, time for a Regime change. The constitution is being shredded and the unions helping the socialist achieve their goals. Lock and Load....

 

Joan Rudolph

Mar 12, 2009

If this passes, whats next the election card so every one can see who or what you are voting for so they can beat you and your family up outside. Get rid of unions, they helped when it first started but now they are making companies go out of business because they want to be the highest paid of all.

 

an American`

Mar 12, 2009

The secret ballot is the synonym for The United States of America. Don't ever les us lose the right/

 

Unions Thugs & Goons

Mar 16, 2009

They want everybdoy to join the union so the union bosses get thier $ 15.00 plus an hour for doing nothing.They will put small contractors out of business, so when you need something done around your house or at your place of business you'll pay union dollars for sweeping floors, placing concrete, asphalt, brick ...you name it. When the union worker wants somthing done they get prices less than union cost, because they know it's a rip.

 

helen shulman

Mar 18, 2009

Being able to cast a vote anonomously and having that vote counted openly are two basic tenents of our society. Why the unions feel threatened by them is unclear to me. This week's issue of the Enonomist suggests unions need to make themselves relavent to today's workers. They cite one in particular, Freelancers' Union, which is new and pertinent. When unions are meeting the needs of workers, they needn't fear the secret ballot. I hope that those of you who have written here are also writing your senators and representatives.

 

don't be silly

Mar 29, 2009

Don't you have to register as a Democrat, republican or Independent to vote in the US elections? Is that not a "card check"? Those records are available to anyone so where is your secret ballot in that instance?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Graphic surveys NFL players concerning concussions

NFL Players Association opposes Goodell's call for players to report on teammates

The NFL Players Association opposes commissioner Roger Goodell's call for players to tell their teams' medical staffs if they think a teammate shows symptoms of a concussion, saying that is not an adequate solution. Full story

Economy

FDA OKs Bristol-Meyers' Abilify to treat irritability linked to autism in children, teens

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved top-selling Abilify as a treatment for autism-related irritability in children from the ages of 6 to 17, drug maker Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. said Friday. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story