Politics

[Print]  [Email]        

Digging in for Obama’s health-care offensive

By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
June 8, 2009

File photo: Barack Obama speaks to the media at the Ann Sather restaurant September 7, 2004 in Chicago, Illinois. Obama outlined a plan to help small businesses pay for health insurance for their employees. (Photo by Tim Boyle/Getty Images)

It's hard to tell whether this meeting, at a La Madeleine restaurant in a sprawling shopping-center complex just outside Washington, is the start of a historic movement or just a strangely wonkish group-therapy session.

About 20 people from Northern Virginia have come to this faux-rustic French café on a Saturday morning to discuss health care reform. That alone makes them unusual; after all, there are a lot of other things one could be doing to begin the weekend. But they have answered the call from Organizing for America (OFA), which is basically the 2008 Obama campaign operating under a new name.

"This is the political issue I care about most, apart from the war," declares one woman, who says she was born and raised in Canada and favors a Canadian-style, single-payer health care system for the U.S.

"It's a moral issue," says another woman, who identifies herself as a nurse.

"It's criminal," says a woman who is from France and envisions a European-style, single-payer system for this country.

This meeting, and others like it -- OFA says there were thousands all across the country -- is the beginning of the hand-to-hand phase of the health care reform fight. After months of buildup, the White House is planning an all-out campaign to pass its reform package, whatever that turns out to be.

Organizing for America prepared a video to accompany the meetings. Much of it is news clips of Obama stressing the need for change. But the second part is a message from Addisu Demissie, the Canadian-born political director for OFA. "We cannot and we will not compromise" on Obama's principles for health care, Demissie says.

Sitting in front of an "I Stand With Sotomayor" poster, Demissie tells participants to "practice sharing your personal health care story." He stresses the need to "be able to articulate what this effort means to you -- your story is the most valuable tool in your arsenal as you talk to your friends and neighbors about the urgent need for reform."

The striking thing about the group at La Madeleine is that most of them don't really have personal health care stories. When the leader goes around the table, none of them has a terrible illness. No one is uninsured. In fact, nearly everyone begins by saying they don't have a problem with health insurance; they have it through their jobs, or in their retirement arrangement, or can afford to purchase it.

But they have their concerns. One woman tells of watching as her mother, and then her younger sister, developed Alzheimer's disease. She is clearly worried about what is next. "I'm by myself," the woman says. "When I walk out of my job, I don't have health care."

A few are nurses who say they've seen patients in dire straits with no coverage. Others are a little, well, quirky. "I'm kind of into alternative, integrative medicines," says one woman. One man appears to be there looking for business opportunities. But many are just people who care a lot about the issue -- and want to win the political debate.

You've heard Republicans warning about a "government takeover" of the health care system. It's safe to say that's exactly what a lot of these people want. Although it's not on the agenda -- "The purpose of the meeting wasn't to discuss policy," the group leader tells me -- in the world of Organizing for America, the most intense debate is among those who want Obama to seek a single-payer government plan now and those who prefer such a plan but believe it is not politically possible at the moment.

A few weeks ago, GOP strategist Frank Luntz conducted research suggesting that Republicans should oppose a government takeover of the health care industry but at the same time acknowledge that the system has serious problems that must be fixed. Seeing this group would be a good companion lesson for the GOP.

Listen to the woman worried that she'll develop Alzheimer's and you'll see why Republicans should have their own plan. But listen to those who just seem to relish the fight and you'll realize they really don't have much of a case for the nationalization of health care. You can help the worried woman without blowing up the system.

Luntz showed Republicans how to make the argument. But as the battle begins, can they match Obama's organization?



beltway confidential

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., who represents Northern Virginia, announced he will vote for the health care bill. Connolly had been on the fence, in part because his district is a...

House members voted 242-192 to allow the Democrats' $1.2 trillion health-care bill to proceed to general debate, which will last about four hours. It is still uncertain whether...

As Democrats expand their health insurance reform bill from 1,000 to 2,000 pages, Republicans on the Joint Economic Committee expand their chart outlining how the new health...

President Obama says "we cannot fully know" what led Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan to kill 13 people and wound 38 others at Fort Hood, Texas Thursday. Hasan reportedly...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

sad world

Jun 9, 2009

well if these people in office didn't have the Great Coverage the voted to give themselfs,they'd be scambling to vote this health care in.

 

SmartyJones

Jun 9, 2009

Vote what in? There isn't even a government plan? There's no plan at all.

If the government was able to rein costs of their own plans currently and stop the abuse by lawyers the system could retain its strong advantages and serve more people at better prices.

This story is perfect because it does reflect a lot of what is going on from one side of the coin. From the family I have in Canada, I know what rationing health care really means: months waiting for operations and MRI tests and sometimes your number comes up from the big calling card in the sky before the government agrees to see you.

Those horror stories are available to anyone who wants to look into it. And in the UK it sounds worse. After all it was there that the muslim terrorists doctors were being imported into the country.

So we could do the same here. Import fundamentalists who plot to kill you at night and treat you during the day.

Awesome.


 

Igor Marxomarxovich

Jun 9, 2009

Old Russian saying...You can tell same lie 1000 time but not change truth!

Difference between USSR Communist media and USA "mainstream media"

In Russia government make media say what they want - even if lie.
In USA "mainstream media" try make government what they want - even if lie..
.....eventually they become same thing?!

It very hard to have credibility to reform health care when one can not perform such a simple medical task as producing his own birth certificate.

Therefore, I Igor produce Obama Birth Certificate at www.igormaro.org

Compare Obama Care vs Igor Care at Obama vs Igor Care

 

Jun 9, 2009

Sadly, to ask the question ("Republican Organization") is to answer it.

 

Kathryn

Jun 9, 2009

I don't want government ANYWHERE NEAR my healthcare.

I don't want government deciding what medical treatment I can receive and that is exactly what will happen when payments for healthcare get filtered through the government.

--------------
We have to fight this massive government involvement in our lives.
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/we-demand-true-conservative-leadership.html

 

ryan

Jun 9, 2009

Death to the entire INSURANCE INDUSTRY!

 

Pat L

Jun 9, 2009

If Obama wants to reduce the cost of healthcare the best place to start would be tort reform. Greedy lawyers filing capricious lawsuits (John Edwards for example) drive up the costs of malpractice insurance and make every doctor so afraid of a lawsuit they order unnecessary tests to cover themselves.

 

sso

Jun 9, 2009

@sad world,

Members of Congress and their staff have the exact same health care as every civilian federal employee -- which just happens to be private insurance.

 

Mark Buehner

Jun 9, 2009

If i walked out of my job, i'd lose my house too. Its crazy, its almost like you need money to have things in this world. There is nothing great about government healthcare. It only has one advantage (especially with people like these in the article)- the government is pretending they know what they are doing. To paraphrase The Joker- people will put up with virtually anything as long as its 'part of the plan', even if the plan is horrifying.

 

Jun 9, 2009

I wonder how many uninsured families could buy health insurance with all the money the Obamas have spent on their "dates". What hypocrits! The left always rail on conservatives for not living up to their family value. Show me where the left live up to their communistic values. The ones in DC seem to be the biggest tax cheats and cheapskates.

 

go_figure

Jun 9, 2009

Most people probably agree the "poor" should have healthcare access and others shouldn't be tied to their jobs just to keep their health insurance. Those items most definitely can be resolved without the government taking over healthcare. Do you REALLY want the gov't in charge of healthcare. What a huge, expensive mistake that would be.

 

Mark Buehner

Jun 9, 2009

"Most people probably agree the "poor" should have healthcare access and others shouldn't be tied to their jobs just to keep their health insurance. Those items most definitely can be resolved without the government taking over healthcare."

They have been resolved. They're called Medicaid and C.O.B.R.A.

 

MTL

Jun 9, 2009

Fascinating article. Here's the problem: what if this kazillion dollar government mandated boondoggle passes, and physicians vote 'no'---with their careers?
I've been a medical specialist for 16 years, after ten years of training. The 22 of us in this practice employ 80 people. Only strict attention to costs keeps us afloat. We see 5000---yes, that's 'thousand'---patient per year with cancer and blood disorders. Another 10% drop in reimbursements, and most of the MDs over 58 (we have 8) will quit; the rest will likely seek alternate careers or practices, or simply go half time. Guess who pays for that?
So: go ahead. Put Medicare clerks and Canadian healthcare fans in charge. Maybe they'll have some good ideas on how to treat your advanced, but curable colon cancer or lymphoma. But probably not. The American public will get the healthcare system they deserve. But they're not going to like it at all. Don't say you weren't warned.

 

smith

Jun 9, 2009

The only reason USA doesn't have modernized health care system is because insurance companies line the pockets of politicians to make sure it doesn't happen.

 

Lily

Jun 9, 2009

I would like to see Heath Care removed from employment - with individuals receiving the tax deductions rather than companies. And also, no minimum mandated coverage - why should a 65 year old have to pay for fertility treatment they don't need? A person should be able to buy a bare-bones policy to insure against catastrophic problems if that's all they want.

government involvement is already a large part of the problem. Government take-over will be a disaster.

 

Guido

Jun 9, 2009

Lily is completely correct. If government, both state and federal would stop mandating minimum coverage (i.e. birth control pills in CA) and insurance policies were structured for what they were originally intended to insure against then some rationality would return to the marketplace.
Employer provided health insurance was a means to circumvent wage/price controls in WWII.

 

Fhjsks@gmail.com

Jun 9, 2009

I think we all know that the nurses are not pushing reform for the patients' sake: they dream of working for the government and getting deals like the teachers' unions. If it were up to Obama and his union goons our hospitals would soon be run like our public schools: for the benefit of the employees not the customers. Don't let this happen America.

 

William Osler

Jun 9, 2009

As a doc like MTL, I have to agree. The politicos seem to think they can force doctors to practice at low rates and high government control, but in reality, many (although not all) of us are actually pretty smart and can do MANY other things than patient care. I

 

we better not have it

Jun 9, 2009

We don't have nationlized health care because it is the job of politicians to make sure we don't.

 

CHNAZ

Jun 10, 2009

If auto insurance excluded 1/6 of drivers the revolution would start yesterday. The individual health insurance market is terrible and should be shot in the head. If it takes a government plan for those that private industry is not serving then so be it. Lund is right the system needs fixing. America has always aspired to raise people up but our health care system is dragging us down and it must be fixed.

 

Thomas

Jun 10, 2009

Two years ago I had heart surgery to repair a busted valve. A Canadian colleague asked me "Well, you had to wait six months for the surgery, right?" She couldn't believe that (a) there were two hospitals within a few miles where I could have had the surgery and that (b) I could have had the surgery at either place within a week. She simply could not believe it.

If I had had to wait for the surgery I would have either (1) died or (2) got an artifical valve.

Now, what was this debate about, again?

 

Tom Spanks

Jun 10, 2009

OFAL Organizing for America Liars.

 

md

Jun 11, 2009

If you are responsible, take of your self, don't have a BMI of over 25, don't smoke, don't do drugs, then you will go to work everyday to provide healthcare for all those Amercians who are too lazy to do what you do.

 

Jul 7, 2009

Lily and Guido are right. Health insurance should be insurance and not mandated. If most routine care was paid out of pocket it would be much cheaper. Govt involvement is part of the reason health care is so expensive, but we want to solve the problem with, what?, more govt? This is turning into a bad dream.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Driver Carl Edwards zips his drivers suit in the garage after practice for Sunday's NASCAR Sprint  Cup Dickies 500 auto race at Texas Motor Speedway, on Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009, in Fort Worth, Texas.  (AP Photo/Ralph Lauer)

Edwards' thinking can't hide frustration; 9 Cup wins over 2 years includes 0 in '09

Carl Edwards has found a way to try to mask the frustration of his winless NASCAR Sprint Cup season. Full story

Politics

Demonstrators chant on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009, during a Republican health Care reform rally. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

House Democrats clear impasse over abortion holding up vote on health care legislation

Capping months of months of struggle, House Democrats cleared an abortion-related impasse blocking a vote on sweeping health care legislation late Friday and officials expressed optimism they had finally lined up the support needed to pass President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. Full story

Entertainment

'Golden Girls' star McClanahan has bypass surgery

Rue McClanahan, who played sexy Southern belle Blanche Devereaux on "The Golden Girls," was recovering Thursday from heart bypass surgery at a New York City hospital. Full story