Politics

[Print]  [Email]        

GOP thinks the unthinkable: Victory in 2010

By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
August 14, 2009

House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio, second from left, speaks to reporters outside the White House in Washington, Friday Jan. 23, 2009, after a meeting between Congressional leaders and President Barack Obama to discuss the economy. From left are, Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.; Boehner; House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Va.; and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

It's a possibility many Republicans speak of only in whispers and Democrats are just now beginning to face. After passionate and contentious fights over health care, the environment, and taxes, could Democrats lose big -- really big -- in next year's elections?

Ask them about it, and many Democrats will point to the continued personal popularity of Barack Obama. But that's not the story. "I think what's going to happen is Obama's going to be fine, and the Democrats in Congress are going to get their asses kicked in 2010," says one Democratic strategist who prefers not to be named. "This is following a curve like the Clinton years: take on really controversial things early, fail, or succeed partially, ask Democrats to take really tough votes, and then lose. A lot of guys are going to get beat, but the president has time to recover."

Most Republican hope focuses on the House of Representatives, but even there they have a huge job ahead. Democrats control 256 seats, and Republicans 178. Forty seats would have to change hands for Republicans to take charge.

On the other hand, 52 seats turned over when the GOP won the House in 1994. And even if Republicans don't get the 40 they need in 2010, they could dramatically narrow the gap between the parties, giving Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership less room to operate.

The polls are definitely moving in the GOP's direction. Just look at the Real Clear Politics average of the generic ballot question, which asks whether, if the election were held today, you would vote for your local Democratic or Republican candidate for Congress. It's been dominated by Democrats for the last few years -- until now.

In recent weeks, poll after poll has shown Republicans neck-and-neck, or even ahead, of Democrats. Even a National Public Radio survey found Republicans in the lead. "There's no question that you're seeing a shift across virtually all the polling," says one GOP strategist, "with Democrats losing ground."

Republicans were sensing momentum earlier in the summer, but events of the August recess -- specifically, the town hall meetings in which opponents of the Democratic health care reform plan have turned out in force -- have changed their view. "This month has opened our eyes," says one plugged-in House aide. "We're seeing real people who are fired up who weren't engaged before -- the first time we've had a popular movement that could really benefit us electorally."

For the moment, Republicans aren't worried about press reports portraying protesters as rent-a-mobs or ugly extremists. A new Gallup poll asking whether the demonstrations have made people more or less sympathetic to the protesters' point of view found that 34 percent of respondents said they were more sympathetic, while just 21 percent said less sympathetic. (Thirty-six percent said it made no difference.) For Republicans, that's a net plus.

Rep. Tom Price, the Georgia congressman who heads the House Republican Study Committee, points to what he calls the fatal combination of Democratic overreaching and arrogance. "I think that means huge gains in the House, with a very distinct possibility of returning Republicans to the majority," says Price. "The American people like checks and balances, and right now they don't see any checks and balances in Washington."

And what if the Republicans stage a comeback? Some Obama supporters think it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. "The truth is, Democratic presidents do better when there's a Republican Congress," says the Democratic strategist. "If there were a Republican Congress, there would be things that are non-starters."

Things like a public option in health care reform, a massive cap-and-trade energy scheme, and all sorts of tax increases. In other words, proposals that are popular with the Democratic base but unpopular with the independent voters who hold the president's fate in their hands.

A Republican victory might not be so bad for a president with re-election on his mind. With a GOP House, Obama would be tugging the debate toward the left, appealing to independents and keeping his Democratic supporters happy. With liberals like Pelosi and Henry Waxman running the House, Obama will be increasingly forced to fight his own party by tugging the debate toward the right -- not a formula for Democratic unity.

Not long ago, some Republicans were worried about becoming a permanent minority party. Although they may not win in 2010, they feel like they're back in the game.

Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appears on www.ExaminerPolitics.com ExaminerPolitics.com.

Get the Latest from Examiner Politics in your Inbox
Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust


beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Danny K.

Aug 14, 2009

Dream on, Byron. Dick Armey correctly tagged these people as being roughly equivalent to the Perot voter in 1992. Peoples' memories aren't as short as the media says. They remember the Republicans as the party of big spenders who refused to hold Bush 43's feet to the fire on the failing war effort. For the Republicans to get traction they are going to need new blood and another Contract with America to accomplish the same feat in 2010. In other words, they are going to need the same passion from their candidates, people who really mean and believe what they say, that you are seeing from the protesters. The stiff, me too Republicans of John Boehner's ilk just aren't going to cut it.

 

Ohiolad

Aug 14, 2009

Republicans should tackle first things first. And the first thing will be to take control of the party away from the moderates and eastern establishment and then to defeat in the primaries every Republican in the House or Senate who sided with the socialists (aka Democrats) on these monstrously fiscally irresponsible and freedom-killing pieces of legislation.

 

Al

Aug 14, 2009

We've been caught in this vicious cycle for the past 80 years, in my lifetime at least, where the republicans come ever so close to a governing majority but the best they can do is have razor thin majorities. And even with strong republican presidents like Ronald Reagan, they still have to fight the democrats' sabotage and manipulations. All the wasted opportunities and energies by having the democrats monopolize our governement for almost 100 years without fixing anything. We need a real change and to let conservative republicans run things for a change would be a major start. Hey, it hasn't been tried yet and it couldn't be worse than what we have in power now.

 

Don L

Aug 14, 2009

We should rush to get back to slow poison rather than fast poison? There has never been a more incompetent, unprinicpled groups of politicians than those assembled in Washington under the banner of the GOP. The left, evil as it is, (abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia?)is still following their atheistic Marxist principles and seems to be willing to force their agenda upon us - so far they seem quite competent when nearly half the nation agreed with them. They own all the major institutions and now are using force to back up their lies. Evil yes@ Incompetent -not yet!
This evil will run its course as it did in Eastern Europe -who knows how long. That may be the better choice than more of the same with the GOP.

 

Sean

Aug 14, 2009

Republicans are hoping the momentum will carry them forward, this is not a good strategy. Either come out forcefully for what you believe in, provide an alternative to this Liberal Administration and Liberal Congress or you'll find any leads in the polls quickly slip away.

Stop being babies and lead!

 

MissManchester

Aug 14, 2009

Republicans better not whisper themselves into the wrong idea. The truth is that it is all incumbents who better be worried--democrats and republicans. If they vote for debt-deepening programs, they will be history in 2010. We can't afford them and we won't for for them. I've been a registered D and a registered R and the label isn't nearly as important as the candidate's ethics and fiscal responsibility. We will vote accordingly. And we may stop shouting in the meantime so this could be their final warning.

 

BLADESKATER00

Aug 14, 2009

THE DEMOCRATS BEING VOTED OUT OF OFFICE IN 2010--IS VERY THINKABLE!

 

Sportsmom

Aug 14, 2009

I agree. I am a Democrat in an NY district that outnumbers Repubicans 3-1 and yet I along with most of my family and a majority of my friends are unhappy with the current liberal leadership and are leaning toward voting Republican in the next go round if for no other reason but to save my children and grandchildren from growing up in a bankrupted country.

 

ajxomes

Aug 14, 2009

No more lies and devisive politics.
I don't want the republicans or democrats, they're the same party. Please give me a third party to fight corruption, abolish the federal income tax, the IRS, and strengthen state's rights and idividual freedom. Once we clean up the corruption, we can talk about social issues.

 

JT

Aug 14, 2009

By that time in 2010, the economy will be markedly improved, the healthcare changes will have started to come into effect (meaning the unfounded fears of some will have gone away) and the only thing left of the GOP will be memories of Bush's incomptency and Sarah Palin's craziness.

 

Rick

Aug 14, 2009

Al, excellent post, and right on spot.

 

Govgirl

Aug 14, 2009

What makes this year different than others is that the anger is not directed at a party, it is directed at votes. People are INFORMED and ANGRY - very, very, very angry. York is right in that because they are out of power the GOP will be the beneficiary of this, at least those that stand against all of this mess. Those in trouble will be the ones who caved to the stimulus, cap and trade, and healthcare (if it gets that far). I think that even some "safe" Dems are worried that if challenged by the right candidate they could lose, because many of them see very low voter turnout amongst their base in midterm elections. I point to NJ as an example, who would have thought last fall that Corzine would be down 9 points to a Republican? So there is hope, but they have to hold the line and fight, loudly - do not give an inch.

 

SmartyJones

Aug 14, 2009

What is more interesting is the total disconnect in Washington to the reality around the country.

The Republicans had members who were looking to tinker with Obama's government takeover plan. Then they went home and discovered that 1,000 pages or not, the American people were going ballistic over the idea of a government takeover.

Americans want reform, they didn't ask or want a government takeover.

Judging by the reaction here, they still don't get it. They think this improves their lot but they fail to see how deep this actually is and will once again be left amazed.

The American people have never risen up like this. It's been developing all year. The reaction from the media and the White House should tell you all you need to know.

They are castigating the American people for merely going out and trying to make their voices heard. For this they are attacked and called every dirty name in the book.

 

wbones8765

Aug 14, 2009

I would have to agree with Byron on this article. The far left policies he is attempting are going to cost the Dems in 2010. I am a conservative, my parents and bro dems, and my sister independent. They all voted for Obama, but would never again. BTW I live in conservative hell, the North East. My parents no longer feel the democrats represent their values. My sister a nurse practitioner regrets her vote. My brother is an attorney and he feels Obama was dishonest with Americans.

 

ErikZ

Aug 14, 2009

No. I'm not going to vote Republican unless they stop thinking that "Democrat-lite" is the way to go. And I don't see that happening.

 

DLT

Aug 14, 2009

The real question is how long will the elistist media continue to handle Obama with kid's gloves? It is amazing how he recieves EVERY beneifit of the doubt from them while Bush 43 was demonzied regularly. see link below-
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/08/12/analysis-press-largely-ignored-incendiary-rhetoric-bush-protest/

 

ajxomes

Aug 14, 2009

The country needs a third party to clean up the corruption. Run on a single issue. No more new legislation except abolish the IRS, the Fed, impose flat tax, severe term limits.

 

Odysseus

Aug 14, 2009

ajxomes - There is always the Libertarians. They run some candidates locally and even put up a presidential candidate. These guys need to get their act together and field lots of local candidates and forget about national races for a few years. I'm a Republican, but in some of my local races, I have voted for the Libertarian because their views were better than both the Republican and the Democrat.

 

tommyd

Aug 14, 2009

Byron is pretty much on target.
Danny K is living in la la land. He is still trying to defeat Bush..
It ain't about Bush anymore.
Its about restoring the balance of power.
No one cares about the points DK is trying to keep alive.
Pushing back Socialism is front and center now. The conservative voter turnout will be the story in 2010.
It will be an all time high.

 

ern

Aug 14, 2009

It's possible that the last two losing elections for the GOP has resulted in a kind of purge that will allow some fresh blood into the congressional GOP, much as what happened in 1994. But I imagine that a GOP with large numbers of Tea Party type people will be substantially more libertarian in bent than the current GOP, and focus less on social issues and more on economic issues. If the social right can keep their sanity intact, that coalition could return the GOP to the White House (eventually), and retain a fighting minority in the house, or senate, in occasional coalition with Blue Dog dems, that works out to a working majority for Republicans if they're willing to compromise on a few things. I think that's pretty much my ideal outcome at this point.

 

cooperscopy

Aug 14, 2009

This may be the only way to slow down this train wreck called the Obama administration. The GOP must make significant gains in 2010...http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/

 

Rod

Aug 14, 2009

sportswoman wrote: "I am a Democrat in an NY district that outnumbers Republicans 3-1 and yet I along with most of my family and a majority of my friends are unhappy with the current liberal leadership and are leaning toward voting Republican in the next go round if for no other reason but to save my children and grandchildren from growing up in a bankrupted country."

Not only is this the exact reason it Democrats will lose the seniors' votes in 2010; it is also the reason they will lose the votes of many of those "children and grandchildren" who bought into "Hope and Change" in 2008. Americans are beginning to realize that government has gotten way, way, way too big and that Pelosi and Reid only want to make it even bigger. Any rational voter knows this is unsustainable.

 

Boyd

Aug 14, 2009

"Although they may not win in 2010, they feel like they're back in the game."

And so they are. But then this was inevitible. The Right was similarly claiming a generation of power after the 2002 midterms and we know how that worked out.

 

Shawn

Aug 14, 2009

First of all let's hope some of the GOP victories in 2010 include actual CONSERVATIVES as we had in '94.

Second, perhaps the GOP closes the gap in 2010, but stays in the minority, thereby continuing to counter leftist utopian nonsense and setting it up for a complete housecleaning in 2012, which includes the Marxist at 1600 Penn. Ave.

 

Aug 14, 2009

Had enough of the Repo's. I'll be voting Libertarian. You can take it from there.

 

Greg

Aug 14, 2009

Danny K - "who refused to hold Bush 43's feet" Ergo we can assume the "short memories" to be roughly 8 yrs...thanks

 

Dolmance

Aug 14, 2009

Typical Republican optimism - their lies are getting traction with people who watch Fox News.

It's always about whether or not their propaganda is working.

 

MOO

Aug 14, 2009

The Republicans will get a lot more traction when the many Gay and Lesbian
Republicans come out of "The Closet."

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

Democrats won in 2008, despite the fact that Americans dislike and disagree with most Democratic politicians.

The reason Democrats won is that the public was disgusted with George Bush, and dislike Republican politicians in general about as much as it dislikes Democratic politicians.

In 2010, George Bush is gone, and Democrats won't be able to resurrect him.

All the Republicans need to do well in the Congressional elections is for the public to be fed up with Democratic rule and to not dislike Republican politicians any more than Democratic politicians.

The wild card will be the economy. We are headed to a great depression, but it is not clear how long the government and Fed policies designed to prop the economy up will forestall the inevitable collapse.

 

Dan A

Aug 14, 2009

There is something much larger that is occuring in politics than who "wins" the majority in Congress. That is that the people have finally become fully engaged in those matters that directly affect them most.

What is most important, regardless of the outcome of the elections in 2010, is that the people continue to be the check on Congress that has been so clearly absent over the last several decades.

If the people continue to hold those they elect accountable, the power grabs and blatant corruption of the last 40 years can be held in check, it is up to us.

 

WM

Aug 14, 2009

Republicans are benefitting from current happenings, but make no mistake: Voters are taking mental notes of what Republicans are doing right now, and they will get back to it later. If Republicans do not come up with a REAL free market health bill, if they continue to cynically push big government health care alternatives just to fill in space, they will not be trusted. They will therefore not be able to consolidate their power over the long run; what support they have will be razor thin. 2014 could look a lot like 2006.

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

Dolmance:

You and other pro-establishment spinmeisters love to avoid the actual facts.

The fact is that the polls are showing improving prospects for the Republicans in 2010. It's a long ways to 2010 and who knows which way the political winds will be blowing in Nov 2010. However, the fact is right now there is reason for Republicans to be optimistic.

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

And by the way, I think Fox News sucks.

Will you say the same about the hatemongering nutjobs at MSNBC?

 

Obamatheworstever

Aug 14, 2009

Nobody is buying Obama slies anymore and its only been 6 months. The DemonRats will lose some seats this fall fo sure.

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

And by the way, Dolmance and other kool-aid drinkers:

Are you aware that Nancy Pelosi's public approval ratings are even lower than Dick Cheney's?

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

Sean said:

"Either come out forcefully for what you believe in, provide an alternative to this Liberal Administration and Liberal Congress or you'll find any leads in the polls quickly slip away."

I disagree. Republicans have been their own worst enemy in recent years. Their best strategy is to shut their mouths and let the Democrats self-destruct.

Republicans would greatly benefit, for example, if Sarah Palin decided to retire from politics for good.

 

ScottD

Aug 14, 2009

The Republicans should remember that the Democrats are doing exactly what got the Republicans thrown out of office--overreaching government. Why do the Republicans want power back? So they can do the same as the Democrats? Or, are they going to form a positive, new agenda? Let's see it, if that's the case. So far, their argument is we're not the Democrats. That won't work very long.

 

Jan, St. Louis

Aug 14, 2009

My parents and grandparents were Democrats. Now my brother and I, and virtually all of our cousins in Arkansas and Tennessee, are Republicans. Even my 75-year old mother votes Republican most of the time. The pary of the "common man" is no longer about the common man getting a fair shake. It's the party of ACORN and SEIU. Democrats are in the "racial grievance" industry, the victimology business. The way they treated Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin was the last straw for me. I was the last holdout in my family. I was still voting Democratic, long after my relatives had abandoned the party. Now I'm out. The Democrats have proven to me that they are not the party of the common man, and they are certainly not the party of the common woman.

 

Patrick

Aug 14, 2009

The Republicans can hope for a 2010 comeback, but that doesn't mean it will happen. Their base is smaller, stranger then it used to be and more extreme! Those of us who left the party won't come back for a long time, maybe never. The Democrats will win both houses and even increase their share in the Senate in 2010.

 

Kevin

Aug 14, 2009

I am one that happens to still believe in President Obama as he was the first person I ever voted for. I still don't understand all of the anger, but I am starting to understand a little bit of it. The gross mis-use of our money from bush was what prompted me and my wife to get and vote for President Obama, but we have become so upset with the continuing, even exacerbating, spending from the bush admin. We have been looking in to the libertarian party and their platform is a perfect platform to restore America. This is what we will be doing next time unless President Obama can prove, which I believe he can, that he is fiscally responsible and truly wants Americans to run this great country.

 

Mike B

Aug 14, 2009

The republicans might win a few house seats and senate seats in 2010, but nobody is going to beat Obama for reelection in 2012. The emerging brown majority spells the end of traditional America as a nation of European descent Christians and Jews. The new black/hispanic/assorted asian majority are comfortable with big government and heavy controls on freedom. They will vote democrat by margins of 70% or more,and the Republican party will be finished as a national party.

 

valwayne

Aug 14, 2009

The dishonesty, arrogance, corruption, and contempt for the American people from the Democrats in Congress has been astonishing. Who would have thought that a Speaker and Majority leader of the House of Representatives would have called elderly and handicapped Americans scare of what might happen to them under Obama care...UN-AMERICAN! Who would have thought that a Speaker of the House would brazenly say she doesn't care if she's unpopular, or attack the heroes who kept us safe after 9/11. The Republicans screwed things up pretty badly, but who would have believed that the Democrats could be 5x more arrogant, corrupt, and incompetent after less than 3 years back in power and only 6 months into Obama's Presidency where they have complete control. Its true! Power corrupts, and abolute power corrupts absolutely!

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

Patrick:

Both parties have a big problem with their base being too small to make them a majority party.

The Democrats have Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid in charge of Congress. Both are extremely unpopular with the public.

The only advantage the Democrats may have in that regard is that their base is more unified. The Democrats' base is the big government left, they are perhaps 20-30% of the public but they are a single faction of the electorate.



Republicans' base is an incendiary combination of social conservatives and economic libertarians- two groups that probably disagree on more than they agree on but in a precarious alliance based on their primary area of agreement- belief in a free market economic system.

 

conservatism=failure

Aug 14, 2009

I want a government that works for ALL the people, not just the rich. Conservatism is anarchy, drowning the baby in the bathwater resulted in the recession we have now

Dems need to destroy the idaa of conservatism, the same way cons spent 30 years destroying normal American leadership which they called "liberalism"

cons favor social Darwinism, drowning the government= anarchy, predatory capitalism, class warfare, supressed wages, eroded unions.

Dems do not communicate how much of a failure the Reagan revolution was, hence the useful idiots who still support conservatism.

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

Mike said:

"The new black/hispanic/assorted asian majority are comfortable with big government and heavy controls on freedom."

That sort of static analysis of politics virtually always turns out wrong.

The political orientation of minorities has evolved over time.

Irish Americans were once Democrats, as they became more integrated into the country and prospered, they switched to Republican.

There is no reason that won't happen with other minorities as well.

Really, the only hope Democrats have of hanging onto minority voters is if they can keep them in poverty.

 

WontGetFooledAgain

Aug 14, 2009

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I voted Republican in 1994 based on their promises to lower taxes and cut spending, blah, blah, blah. The result was a wild spending spree and a culture of corruption. Democrats routinely lie to their supporters and still get their votes. (Low self-esteem? Battered Wife Syndrome? dunno) But to equate disapproval of Democrats into approval for Republicans is wishful thinking. Democrat? or Democrat-Lite? Guess I'll go with Not-Incumbent. Can you you hear me now, Richard Burr?

 

Tokolosh

Aug 14, 2009

Yeah. Sure. Dream on.
Adult voters are going to be swayed by granny's juvenile antics at town halls?

By the time 2010 rolls around, even granny would have found out that she was conned by the GOP. And there is going to hell to pay.

There goes another 'base' of the GOP?

In the meantime, enjoy your fantasies.

 

StepIntoTheLight

Aug 14, 2009

Republicans have a real chance to win back Congress in 2010, provided they remain on point and provide voters alternative, cost-effective strategies to counter Obama's liberal free-for-all high-priced failed experiments.

 

TheMexican

Aug 14, 2009

The GOP should run silent, run deep and not be counting their blessings ahead of time.

 

democratsarefascists

Aug 14, 2009

Democrat arrogance has already cost them 2010.

 

Aug 14, 2009

Remember the 2008 Primary Election: GOP were united enough for McCain, while the Dems were split 50/50 Obama vs Hillary. Most of my Dem friends are of the Hillary camp, and they have no real sympathy for Obama. Factor in the independent voters falling away from Obama, and you now have up to two-thirds of active voters who are not worshipping the new Messiah.

GOP SWEEP 2010

 

Sigfried Weston

Aug 14, 2009

If the GOP thinks they'll gain by being the same as they've been the past decade, they're dreaming. People wish for leaders who have a vision of America beyond winning office and pushing mandates which take away freedoms. The Bushes and McCains,Huckabees and Romneys need not apply. I don't have a name to offer for 2012; but for 2010 the Repubs better have some fresh faces with a commitment to liberty, or totalitarian Dems will win again and doom us to 3rd world status.

 

findthetiger129

Aug 14, 2009

Truth is, we also need to get more independents into the congress. As a conservative, I may lean Republican, but I won't deny that both sides have their share of corruption. I think if we could get more independent congressmen in office then we'd at least have some sort of buffer between the two parties to put a lock on this "We won. We are mandated to do what we want!" mentality. That would help make things less volitale and make transitions a bit more smooth from president to president. Not only that, but putting in place some term limits and taking the congress' ability to write their own paychecks might help as well.

 

JCIll

Aug 14, 2009

A 1994-esque takeover of congress is unlikely. There are too many lawmakers firmly intrenched. What is likely, however, is a narrowing of the gap in 2010 that will rein in Obama's ability to bulldoze far-left legislation. Sometimes I think that gridlock is a good thing.

 

Fatty Bolger

Aug 14, 2009

What is happening is that people are starting to realize that there is a massive disconnect between what Democratic politicians say, and what they actually want to do. They were allowed to get away with this for the last couple of years because they could always blame Bush & the Republicans. The sad thing is, they still do! It just doesn't have the same effect when you have 100% control of Congress & the presidency.

 

JohnR

Aug 14, 2009

The party in power usually loses seats on the off-year elections. But for the Dems to lose the House, two things would have to happen: (1) The Reps have to find a congressional leader who can offer a viable alternative like the Contract With America, and (2) Unemployment will have to remain above 8%.

 

Aug 14, 2009

The stiff, me too Republicans of John Boehner's ilk just aren't going to cut it.


What? This is your best commentary/critique of Republicans? What about the alternative health care plans, the plans to get this nation's economy restored, etc.? Republicans make up many faces and ideas - all across the nation. We're seeing a Conservative/Independent resurgence within the nation and with the R party and a coalescing of opposition to the power grubbing policies of the far left of the Democrat party. Obama said we should look forward - that's exactly what we're doing. There's nothing to 'dream on' about that - that's just reality now.

 

SeattleBruce

Aug 14, 2009

The stiff, me too Republicans of John Boehner's ilk just aren't going to cut it.


What? This is your best commentary/critique of Republicans? What about the alternative health care plans, the plans to get this nation's economy restored, etc.? Republicans make up many faces and ideas - all across the nation. We're seeing a Conservative/Independent resurgence within the nation and with the R party and a coalescing of opposition to the power grubbing policies of the far left of the Democrat party. Obama said we should look forward - that's exactly what we're doing. There's nothing to 'dream on' about that - that's just reality now.

 

dumbpatriot

Aug 14, 2009

The Dems always lose when it comes to the issues of taxes and spending. They overreach when then get in power and turn off the mainstream American voter.

There is a reason why Bill Clinton was the only Democrat re-elected since FDR.
He downsized the govt, reformed welfare, worked with the GOP Congress to limit taxes, etc. He governed from the middle basically.

 

John B.

Aug 14, 2009

A Republican House is pretty much a fait accompli now. The question on my mind, with everyone from Burris to Specter to Dodd to Boxer to (Beau) Biden in trouble, is whether the GOP just MIGHT take the Senate back too

 

Brooks

Aug 14, 2009

Hubris meets Nemesis.

 

Duke of Yashima

Aug 14, 2009

Attacks on Sarah Palin exist because she's not GOP Establishment, but rather because she's for honest and low-budget government that does a few things (like defense) well and leaves the rest to states and others. Both the Dems and GOP establishment hate that kind of thing, so the Dems cooked her and the GOP Establishment stood by and watched her get fried.

However, it's just that sort of approach to government that is shared by Independents and Conservatives, who are sick of GOP incompetence and Democratic underhandedness.

Perhaps a third party might be the way to go, after all?

 

Meet New Boss Same as Old Boss

Aug 14, 2009

Whatever happens in 2010 and beyond is irrelevant as long as it's just Republicans and Democrats. We've been living under one-party tyranny for at least twenty years. Unless and until a true opposition party arises, the Republicrats will maintain status quo.

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

"Remember the 2008 Primary Election: GOP were united enough for McCain"


Yeah, only conservatives were against McCain. And of course there are very few conservative Republicans.


By the way, I strongly disagree with those who consider Palin a legitimate political voice. Palin spouts the talking points, and also runs her mouth as we have seen bigtime in her inflammatory comment about the granny issue.

I think the scorched-earth lawsuit campaign mounted against her in Alaska was reprehensible, but I think she understands far too little on policy issues to be a serious contender for high office. Furthermore, because her stands on issues are so vague, do you even know where she stands on important issues?

For example, would she support amnesty for illegal aliens? My guess is that she would, because she tends to take pro-establishment stands on issues.

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

"Whatever happens in 2010 and beyond is irrelevant as long as it's just Republicans and Democrats"


Hey, what cynicism. It's at least as good as being able to choose between Coke and Pepsi, right?

 

Aug 14, 2009

"Perhaps a third party might be the way to go, after all?"


The big missing party in the US is one that is liberal on social issues and conservative on fiscal issues.

I would bet that about half the public fits that category.

However, neither of the two major parties represents that policy agenda.


If a third party emerges in this country, I think it will arise out of the Blue Dog Democrats. The fact is, Nancy Pelosi doesn't play in Peoria. A party in which the inmates (Pelosistas) run the asylum, and the sane people (Blue Dogs) sit on the bench, is one that is inherently unstable and will eventually break apart.

 

lance sjogren

Aug 14, 2009

Hey lefties- you are aware are you not that there are some liberal Democrats who support genuine health care reform and not the ideological hack stuff of the Pelosistas, are you not?

Namely, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon has put together a bipartisan health plan that has attracted support from both Democrats and Republicans.

It is a GENUINE reform measure.


However, Pelosi and Reid and the other obstructionists no doubt will do their best to bury it in favor of a "my way or the highway" left wing bill.

 

dmac

Aug 14, 2009

Republicans love to dream of returning to glory. In the meantime there's lies to tell and far right-wing constituents to pander to.

It's funny how the 8 years of Bush are never mentioned anymore by Republicans.

 

chris tampa

Aug 14, 2009

Here's the worst thing I've heard in months. The Obama administration has now put a crony in charge of the FCC who is now openly working to shut down talk radio by taxing radio companies out of existence. How will we be able to hear the reality of what's going on without talk radio? How long will it take for the Supreme Court to rule that the federal government can't stop these companies from broadcasting? Will it be shut down so quickly that it will take years to stop the fascists? How will Americans hear the truth about what is happening? It is a nightmare.

 

commonbond

Aug 15, 2009

Obama will get a phony health care bill passed, hype his supposed success, win praise in the media, and cruise to reelection. It's a lock.

 

chesterdog

Aug 15, 2009

hahahahahahahahahahahaha

Do you really think voters will forget so quickly what things were like when you ran things? You think young voters are suddenly going to swing Republican? Hispanic voters? Meanwhile, more and more of your voters are dying every year. You are delusional.

 

Mike

Aug 15, 2009

Real Conservativism is on the rise my fellow Americans. Ride the wave!

 

Cohen

Aug 15, 2009

Republican have something undercover, they know what success come for the democrats, what they (conservative republican) try do is intimidating ordinary americans not because of dems' bad policies but because they understand that when the democrats succeeded in economic policies and health care policies, republican will become the minority party for a very long time, what republican try to do now is to rescue their party, and what republican do its normal issue in current global politics, republican should criticize democrats with vivid evidence and well elaboratesd alternative, thus how opposition should work.

 

lisa

Aug 16, 2009

Ummmmmmm... let's just wait until 2010 shall we. You notice the Republicans only do well when they never open their mouths. When they actually have to try and sell their ideas, people hate them. That's why they lost so badly in 2006 and 2008. They're out of touch. I would put big money down in Vegas that 2010 won't be any different.

 

Gunny G

Aug 16, 2009

Conservative victory in 2010

Jindal/Palin 2012

Impeach the Kenyan Usurper!

Suck on it libs.

 

Hillary

Aug 16, 2009

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!

Keep dreamin', white trash!

 

Robert

Aug 16, 2009

There is a golden opportunity for the Republican party to not only win, but become dominant for a generation or more in the next few years. They would do well to make sure the Republican party brand truly represents the American values of limited government, lower taxes, individual self-reliance and independence, individual liberty, and economic growth and prosperity. Anyone who will not steadfastly stand for those principles should have no right to market themselves under the Republican party label. That is what the Republican party must do if it wants to become dominant beyond 2012, not merely be swept in only because they are "not Democrats" in 2010 and 2012. The negative public mood that people will associate with the Democratic party over the next few years will bring about the latter. They will have to work to bring about the former.

 

Jeff Christie

Aug 17, 2009

Conservative Republicans are afraid of smart people.

 

omeg

Aug 17, 2009

THE SOLUTION FOR WASHINGTON.
Go "nuclear" by Voting EVERYBODY OUT and vote in ALL NEW PEOPLE. This is what Ross Perot was advising back in 1992. THIS IS THE ONLY SOLUTION. That is because as a famous radio host George Putman put it plainly: The Republicans and Democrats are in the same bed or camp.
Those who are "pro=environment" AND for taxes, the IRS, or other un-american laws or agencies MUST be black listed and never allowed to even entertain running for any office not matter how small. WE NEED ALL NEW PEOPLE WITH HIGH MORAL PRINCIPLES.

 

VinceP1974

Aug 18, 2009

It sickens me to say that the GOP must win in 2010, if only to end the tryanny that the insane Democrats are running in Congress.

But the GOP sure as heck haven't earned that. It's only due to the fact that we're stuck in two-party land that I have to support them.

I cant stand the wimpy Republicans. I cant.

I'll say this, if they dont run on a platform committed to returning Constitutional Governance, then they're over with.

The ideological damage that Marxists have done in this country is probably unrepairable.. but it will never be rolled back with the paintywaists in the GOP and media.

 

Chris Delia

Dec 15, 2009

www.pistoneforcongress.org
"PUTTING PROGRESS AHEAD OF PARTY
POLITICS" PISTONE FOR CONGRESS

 

1314520zxl

Jan 7, 2010

The elements that represent the classical values connected to the louis vuitton brand are implicitly present throughout the design.

These elements are to a large extent identical to the modernity also implicit in the name louis vuitton online shop , along with the value of inventiveness.

The leaf is found in the floor plan, in the section and in the elevation. It has been applied to the construction also, responding to location-specific constructional eluxury louis vuitton demands.

 

Jan 11, 2010

projeksiyon

 

mytiffany

Jan 25, 2010

Colin Mathers tiffanys was the lead author of the study. tiffany co He is the W.H.O.'s coordinator for epidemiology tiffany rings and burden of disease tiffany jewellery. He says the research points to major differences around the world.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story