Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Dining stimulus plan
Welcome,   My Account |  Log out
Welcome, Guest  Sign In |  Register
Sunday, March 21, 2010 | Last Update 1:06 EDT
View today's E-Dition

click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classifieds Jobs Autos Home Listings
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Weather Mobile Site RSS Feeds Contact
Nation World Science Education RSS Feeds
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Chris Stirewalt
Local Front DC Virginia Maryland Blogs Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate Events Calendar
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler's Toons Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Blogs Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Movies Television Music Health Events Calendar

Politics
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

New Year's resolutions for the Pentagon

By: Peter W. Singer
Examiner National Security Columnist
December 22, 2009


Eat fewer sweets. Be a good father. Pray more often.

These were all New Year's resolutions I made 12 months ago. I shouldn't have needed the start of the new year to examine ways, both large and small, to become a better me, but that is the value of the tradition. But why should it only be for people? What sort of resolutions might the Pentagon make in the year ahead, to become a better Defense Department?

Keep the training focus in Afghanistan. In this third troop surge in the last year, it is easy to focus on what happens in battle. But defeating the Taliban, yet again, is far less important to our ultimate success than building up Afghan security forces to be able to do the job themselves. By the end of the year, the Afghan army should be built out from 90,000 to 134,000, its pay scales raised to aid retention, protective gear bought for each of its units, and enough Pashtun recruited to better local acceptance.

Sign a tanker deal, yesterday. America's ability to project global power depends on our air-to-air refueling capabilities. The defense leadership should not care whether the winner of this decade-long process is Boeing, Northrop or even Spacely Sprockets. The first KC-135 was purchased in 1954. The continued deferral to replace it, driven by politics, will haunt our security for decades to come. Make a decision, any decision.

Plan B for failure. Across the Pentagon are a series of acquisitions programs described as "too big to fail." They are. In the air, land and sea, we've painted ourselves into a corner with commitments to buying the equivalents of the Pontiac Aztek, originally supposed to appeal to all, but ultimately so over-engineered and overpriced that it's not a good option to anyone. As their prices go up further, and we are thus able to buy even fewer of them, its time to explore other options.

Act on personnel policy. Defense personnel policy was designed for the 1950s, with on- and off-ramps to service that don't match the current generation's needs. Even worse, personnel costs are the fastest growing part of the Pentagon budget, squeezing spending out elsewhere. Rather than punting the problem once more, it's high time to update the policy to allow more flexible service options. This should also encompass finally acting on what we all know is coming: ending "Don't Ask Don't Tell." It is a policy whose time has past. Even more so, it wastes millions of dollars driving out servicemen and servicewomen, who have already proved their ability to do their job.

Better support transitioning service members. With the tough economy, those who have recently served in the active duty or National Guard and Reserves are being hit especially hard. The number of unemployed Iraq and Afghanistan veterans is now almost the same as the number of service members currently deployed in support of those two wars.

Kick interagency partners into action. In June, President Obama made a historic speech in Cairo, Egypt, laying out how to improve relations with the Muslim world. Not one of his 16 announced initiatives has been enacted since by the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development, and only three of the 16 are on pace to be met by the one-year anniversary. The State Department and CIA continue to hire, and even rehire, contractors that undermine counterinsurgency efforts with unprofessional conduct. And the president's stated goal of creating a 25,000-person Civilian Assistance Corps, which could backstop federal agencies with volunteers with special skills, remains unimplemented. Why should this matter to the Pentagon? Because, as one Marine general put it, we can either act on our broader security efforts or plan on buying more bullets for the additional battles we will have to fight.

Obviously, these are not the only goals the Pentagon should set for the year ahead. And just like how eating fewer sweets was probably not the most important thing I could resolve to improve myself, they may not even encompass the most crucial changes needed. But perhaps what is most notable is that, just like the resolutions that most of us will make again this year, each links back to past commitments that have fallen by the wayside.

One study found that only 12 percent of New Year's resolutions are actually followed through on. What will be the Pentagon's success rate for 2010?

Peter W. Singer is director of the 21st Century Defense Initiative at the Brookings Institution. He is the author of "Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century" (Penguin, 2009).


Topics

Washington Examiner

beltway confidential
$29 billion more deception in the health care legislation

Policy and legislative strategy analyst Keith Hennessey shows how the Democrats’ health care legislation understates future costs by assuming that Medicaid payments will...

—Michael Barone

Sen. Hatch, R-Utah, says Dems are "nuts" to think tomorrow's vote ends health care debate

Even with Democrats abandoning the "deem and pass" strategy, Democrats still have a lot of procedural hurdles to clear before health care reform becomes a reality. Sen. Orrin...

—Mark Hemingway

Tea Party protesters refused entry into congressional buildings

As part of today's rally to stop the Democrats' health care reform legislation thousands of protesters descended on the lawn of Capitol building. But many more were also using...

—Mark Hemingway

House Democrats abandon 'deem and pass'

Democrats on Saturday backed down on a plan that would have allowed them to vote on passing the bill without directly voting on it. The House Sunday will have to pass a...

—Susan Ferrechio

More Beltway Confidential posts...





Featured Writers
Bill O'Reilly
No politics at the Oscars, thank goodness
Diana West
U.S. confusion fogs relationship with Israel
Diane Dimond
Time to close the door on a bad idea -- early prison release
Steve Chapman
Time to change the faces on our dollars
Mona Charen
This is a non-arrogant foreign policy?
Michael Barone
$29 billion more deception in the health care legislation

To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. Rules Committee meeting descends into chaos
  2. Tea Party protesters refused entry into congressional buildings
  3. GOP: Dems are bluffing, don't have the votes
  4. The state of play in the House
  5. Dems waste time in House as vote search goes on
  6. As Dems struggle, GOP candidates line up to run
  7. Sen. Hatch, R-Utah, says Dems are "nuts" to think tomorrow's vote ends health care debate
  8. House Democrats abandon 'deem and pass'
  9. If Ellsworth is a 'yes,' then there really are no votes to spare, but the votes are probably there
  10. Updated Whip check for Friday afternoon: Add Boyd and Altmire, and you've got 211 'no' votes, 13 undecided





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Warning: If you comment, the Disqus platform default is set to email you when other reply to it. If you do not want to receive these replies to your comment, please uncheck the box.


blog comments powered by Disqus


Local

Deadly accidents involving iPods alarm officials

At least three people in the Washington region have died in accidents in the last year, while wearing headphones. Full story

Sports

NCAA Tournament: Games to watch, March 19, 2010

No. 5 Temple vs. No. 12 Cornell Where »... Full story

Scoop

Scoop: Bullock’s marriage called a total sham

More revelations are emerging about the... Full story

Internships | Maps | RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise