Politics

[Print]  [Email]        

Obama shadow boxes with 'enemies' of health plan

By: Timothy P. Carney
Examiner Columnist
September 9, 2009

Emmanuel Goldstein was the enemy of the state in George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four," and the target of the "Two Minutes Hate," in which the citizens of Oceania -- at the cue of Big Brother -- would rage at those undermining the state and the party.

Within the novel, it's never clear if Goldstein is real or a fabricated whipping boy for party officials and angry citizens.

Unlike Big Brother, President Obama hasn't even deigned to give us a name for the enemy of "reform." He uses only ominous, vague epithets: "Opponents of health insurance reform," "well-financed forces" and "those who are profiting from the status quo."

So I asked both the White House and the Democratic Party to name these malefactors of great wealth.

I called the White House last week, and asked for names, and was told to e-mail spokesman Reid Cherlin. I asked Cherlin about the WhiteHouse.gov statement, "For those who fight reform in order to profit financially or politically from the status quo, the president sends a simple message: 'Not this time.' "

And I asked about this line in Portsmouth, N.H: "Despite all the hand-wringing pundits and the best efforts of those who are profiting from the status quo ... "

"Please name names," I requested. "Which businesses, lobbyists or industries is he referring to?"

Mr. Cherlin hasn't responded.

I also called Organizing for America, the heir of the Obama campaign, now run by the Democratic National Committee. In an e-mail, the group wrote: "Opponents of health insurance reform have power. Some reap huge profits from the status quo." And: "These same well-financed forces have killed reform in the past, and they're aiming to do it again."

Who were these "well-financed forces" and profiting "opponents of ... reform"?

Organizing for America didn't call me back, either.

You see this nameless line of attack from Obama and the Democrats every day. It's called demagoguery.

Since Obama won't put a name on the enemies of reform, we need to do some detective work. A prime suspect "profiting from the status quo" would be the industry within the medical sector with the highest profit margins, namely the drug makers, which averaged 16.5 percent profit margins last quarter.

But the drug makers have been team players. The Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America, the largest industry lobbying group in the country, is shelling out $12 million for pro-"reform" ads this summer and fall. Obama has bragged that "even the pharmaceutical industry" is on board.

Doctors? Nope. Obama said in Portsmouth, "We have the American Medical Association on board."

The obvious culprit remaining is the health insurance industry. Why, then, don't Obama or the DNC name the insurers, and their lobby, America's Health Insurance Plans, as the "well-financed forces" profiting from the status quo. Is the president just being polite?

More likely the president doesn't want to name the health insurers as enemies because the industry is lobbying for most of the Democrats' plans -- especially the subsidies for private insurance and the proposed mandate that everybody buy insurance. The industry dissents on only one proposal: a government insurance option.

For Obama, a nameless enemy is more useful because it allows people to imagine whatever "well-financed forces" they like as the enemy. It's visceral demagoguery.

Liberals, who see a government option as indispensable, still imagine that Obama is engaged in a death struggle with the insurers -- even though Obama has signaled he's willing to toss the government option overboard. Meanwhile, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, tying together former House Majority Leader Dick Armey's lobbying for a drug company and his nonprofit group's opposition to Obama's reform, argued on Aug. 7 that the drug companies were the well-financed opponents of reform -- even though they're supporting it.

Obama, in "The Audacity of Hope," described himself as "a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views." Today, through his rhetoric, Obama has created a different blank screen, one on which he invites his allies to project not their hopes but their fears and resentments.

Obama adviser David Axelrod has convinced Obama that attacking the health insurers is good politics. But Obama still won't call them opponents of "reform" because there's a good chance he'll sign off on the insurers' agenda. Then he can claim victory over those dastardly "opponents of reform."

Timothy P. Carney, The Examiner's lobbying editor, can be reached at tcarney@washingtonexaminer.com. He writes an op-ed column that appears on Friday.



beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Alex Brant-Zawadzki

Sep 9, 2009

You want names? How about United Healthcare? How about Rick Scott? How about Dick Armey? How about every Republican Congressional staffers and PR strategists behind the so-called grassroots groups? How about Bonner & Associates and other lobbying groups, paid by insurance companies, big pharma etc. to kill health care reform? How about doctors who are getting rich off the status quo by ordering unnecessary procedures? How about Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly etc. who pull in advertisers like Americans for Prosperity and 60 Plus by shilling their nonsensical anti-reform propaganda?

I exclude from the list those Americans showing up at health care town halls opposing reform. They are exercising their rights (sometimes at the expense of the rights of others, to free speech without getting shouted down for example) and they are legitimately upset because they have been lied to.

With respect,
Alex Brant-Zawadzki
volunteer
Organizing for America

 

Alex Brant-Zawadzki

Sep 9, 2009

How about American Liberty Alliance? They sell advertising on their site, they ask those on their email list for donations, and are very possibly profiting off of all this hysteria, hysteria they are helping to gin up through, among other means, a nationwide Bus Tour kicking off in Sacramento on Sept. 10 - and yet they argue the Organizing for America bus tour is astro-turf. Our organizers do not stand to profit from health-care reform. American Liberty Alliance and other high-powered opponents to health-care reform DO stand to profit.

With respect,
Alex B-Z

 

Mitchell Vickers

Sep 9, 2009

If Tim Carney is unfamiliar with the "enemies of health care reform" he must inhabit some odd corner of the Twilight Zone where he is not exposed to TV, radio, or newspapers.

 

bryan

Sep 10, 2009

The insurance companies would like nothing more than to have millions of uninsured young americans who normally wouldn't buy insurance to be FORCED into buying insurance

 

Bonnie

Sep 10, 2009

If I as a citizen express a view point different than the Presidents makes me an enemy A profiteer is ridiculas. I Listened to our President last night and I am scared for my country when a man will look us in the face And lie so boldly.

 

Sep 21, 2009

B-Z, I don't think you named a single person that actually "profits from the status quo," with the exception of the insurance company you named, United Healthcare. And Obama will ultimately give them what they want anyway, so you really haven't named anyone.

 

Alex Brant-Zawadzki

Jan 23, 2010

I disagree. Cite some evidence or something, don't just say, "You're wrong!" That's not constructive criticism. It's not even discussion. It's simply negation.

 

mytiffany

Jan 25, 2010

A new study from tiffanys the World Health Organization tiffany co says fifty-nine million people died from tiffany rings all causes in two thousand four tiffany jewellery. Ten million of them were children.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story