Politics

[Print]  [Email]        

Union bill a political minefield

By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
February 23, 2009

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., center, accompanied by Senators, speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday. From second from left are, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Reid, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa. (AP photo)

Beginning today, Congress has six weeks of legislative work before the next recess, which sounds like plenty of time to move through some big initiatives, including the Employee Free Choice Act Democrats promised labor unions would be passed quickly.

But the legislation, which would make it easier for unions to organize workplaces, has turned into a political minefield for the Democrats who, despite wide majorities in both chambers, have pushed action on the legislation into the summer to avoid what one blogger called “the mother of all labor brawls.”

In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., may have difficulty rounding up the 60 votes needed to prevent Republicans from blocking the legislation, which opponents have nicknamed the “card check bill.”

Opponents say the bill does away with secret ballots for union votes, and they suggest that unions want to be able to apply direct pressure on workers because most efforts currently fail.

Reid controls the Senate with 58 Democratic votes, two shy of the supermajority he needs. But two of his Democrats, Sens. Mark L. Pryor and Blanche L. Lincoln, both of Arkansas, a right-to-work state, have signaled they may not vote for it.

“Senator Lincoln has not made up her mind yet on the legislation,” her spokeswoman said Friday. Pryor has refused to co-sponsor the legislation, which he has done in the past. Instead, he wants a compromise bill that would also satisfy business groups that vehemently oppose the Employee Free Choice Act.

When the Senate rejected the bill last year, every Democrat, including Lincoln and Pryor, voted for it, as did one Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter.

Reid cannot necessarily count on Specter this time. Specter is running for a fifth term in Pennsylvania. It’s a heavily unionized state, but business groups have threatened to bankroll a strong primary challenge to Specter if he votes in favor of it again.

“On that issue, they have thrown the gauntlet down,” said Franklin and Marshall College political science professor Terry Madonna. “If Specter supports it, small businesses are going to abandon him. If he votes against it, I doubt he will get the endorsement of the [AFL-CIO] union. No senator is more on the griddle than Specter on this issue.”
Support for the legislation has weakened in the House, too. While the bill passed easily last year before dying in the Senate, the more conservative Democrats in the Blue Dog Coalition have grown sensitive to opposition from the business community, which has decried the bill as a job killer.
The legislation would allow union organizers to bypass a secret ballot vote and would instead require only signatures on a petition to form a union. While proponents say the bill removes unnecessary roadblocks to unionizing, critics say it would eliminate time for company representatives to argue their viewpoint that unionizing hurts job creation and job stability.

Some Blue Dogs, particularly those from Southern right-to-work states, want to wait for it to pass the Senate, where it could be softened. The Blue Dogs also want to avoid voting for the bill only to watch it fail in the Senate.

The Senate-first approach, a top Democratic leadership aide said, “is one option, but it has not been decided on.” The aide also said the bill could come up in the House before summer.

President Barack Obama has been conspicuously, and some say wisely, silent on the topic. But he said last month that he would not push for passage in the current economic climate.

“If we are losing half a million jobs a month, then there are no jobs to unionize,” Obama told The Washington Post. “So my focus first is on ... key economic priority items.”


sferrechio@dcexaminer.com



beltway confidential

The headline on Bloomberg's obituary for the recently deceased Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., is "Lawmaker Murtha, Supporter of Troops, Dies at Age 77." That's a bizarre headline for...

Republicans and business interests were already deeply suspect of Craig Becker, Obama's nominee to the National Labor Relations Board. Becker was formerly counsel to the AFL-CIO...

Just a few years after scandal nearly destroyed the Buckeye State's GOP, Rasmussen has the Ohio Republican candidates for governor and Senate leading their Democratic...

I've just been in touch with Sen. Christopher Bond, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

willie templin

Feb 23, 2009

I am the owner of a 42 yr old co. in Tx and if i am forced to be union by this bill then i have all the money i need and close our doors and but 120 people out of work,how can that be good for our country.There are thousands of small companies like my. Only 14% of our work force is union and their are lots of reasons why. I now have no president that wants to help me or America

 

be realistic

Feb 23, 2009

Willie: Let's be realistic. First, this bill will not force you to be union. If the bill does ever pass, that does not mean every company in the U.S. would become union. There are some companies that do not need to be unionized. Some employees don't want to be unionized. HOwever, there are some worksites that would like to be union and some that need to be. Do you think your employees would want to be union? If so, why?

 

Section 2

Feb 23, 2009

Why are so many people ruffled by this bill? First, the Employee Free Choice Act does not abolish free elections. It offers employees who want to unionize a choice. That's why they call it the Employee Free Choice Act. Section 2 of the EFCA gives employees an option. If they want a secret ballot election, they can have it. If they want "card check", they can do that if they want. Hence the word Choice. Doesn't that make sense?

 

curious

Feb 23, 2009

I am curious Willie; what are the reasons only 14% of our workforce is union?

 

Russ

Feb 23, 2009

Both HR 800 and S-1041 state that once the majority of cards of a bargaining unit are submitted to the NLRB the union is recognized as the bargaining agent for the employees. There is no provision that states that the employees can then ask for an election. Elections may still be on the books, but the secret ballot election is effectively dead and the employee has "no choice"

 

John

Feb 23, 2009

The Employee Free Choice Act is a new name for legislation that has been pending for over 30 years. It is never going to pass. Two years from now they will compromise and include some minor arbitration provisions in the NLRA.

 

read the bill

Feb 23, 2009

Russ: Read section 2 of the Employee Free Choice Act. The choice is with the employees. What changes is the employer, repeat the employer, can no longer dispute and that's why entities like the chamber of commerce is spinning this thing. And it appears that you have not read what the EFCA says but are repeating things that you have heard.

 

Feb 23, 2009

Read what Section 2 says before you repeat what others have told you Russ

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story