Politics

[Print]  [Email]        

'Fierce urgency' for jobs, not health care

By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
October 23, 2009

(AP Photo/The Independent Tribune, James Nix)

How many times have you heard Barack Obama talk about "the fierce urgency of now"? The president has used the quote, from Martin Luther King Jr., to call for quick action on the war in Iraq, on global warming, on homelessness, on education -- you name it.

Now, Obama and his fellow Democrats are trying to convince the nation of the fiercely urgent need to enact national health care reform this very instant.

"We have been waiting for health reform since the days of Teddy Roosevelt," Obama told the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation in September. "We cannot wait any longer. ... There comes a time to remember the fierce urgency of right now."

But the American people simply do not share Obama's sense of urgency about health care reform. In a new poll, the Gallup organization asked the following question: "If Congress is going to reform the health care system, should Congress deal with health care reform on a gradual basis over several years, or should Congress try to pass a comprehensive health care reform plan this year?" Just 38 percent of those surveyed want reform now, versus a clear majority -- 58 percent -- who want reform on a gradual basis.

When you break Gallup's results down by political party, you see that Democrats are the only ones feeling any urgency at all. Fifty-nine percent of Democrats want reform now, but 77 percent of Republicans, and 63 percent of independents, want gradual reform. When it comes to health care reform, there is no fierce urgency of now.

The plain fact is, the public's top priority lies elsewhere. "The only issue that people have a sense of fierce urgency about right now is the economy and jobs," says Republican pollster David Winston. "The president is in an uphill battle to try to move the discussion to other topics."

It's not that people think health care is unimportant. They just think the economy and jobs are more important -- far more important.

Obama knows that; that's why he tries to link health care and economic recovery, arguing that we can't have real recovery without health care reform. But people aren't buying it.

For a recent report to House Republican leader Rep. John Boehner, Winston asked people to judge two different approaches to today's woes. The choice was between "Republicans who say Congress should be focusing on long-term policies that create jobs, like small business and family tax relief, and controlling federal spending to get our economy moving again," and "Democrats who say that health insurance reform is key to jump-starting the economy by expanding coverage to the uninsured, lowering costs, and restricting the worst insurance company practices, and we must get it done this year."

Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed with the Republican approach, versus 40 percent who agreed with the Democratic approach. That's not because they like Republicans better than Democrats -- they don't -- but because they want their leaders to directly address the economy and jobs.

Now, with Christina Romer, chairwoman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, conceding that unemployment, currently nearing 10 percent, is "likely to remain at severely elevated levels" through all of 2010, the contrast between the public's deep worries over jobs and the president's obsession with passing health care reform could not be more striking.

"There's a concern that the administration is off on the wrong topic," Winston says. "Americans are saying, 'What about the economy? What about jobs? Let's get that taken care of, and then we can address health care.' "

But Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress aren't answering. If you want to know why, just go back to that speech to the Congressional Black Caucus. National health care has been the holy grail of the Democratic Party for decades. At this moment, Democrats hold 256 seats in the House and 60 in the Senate. Most observers expect them to lose seats in November 2010, and much of next year to be consumed by midterm election campaigning. So there will never be a moment better than now for Obama and his party to achieve their long-cherished goal.

The problem is, the public believes there are more important things to do at this moment. If the president and his party ignore their wishes, the voters' next fiercely urgent priority might be defeating Democrats at election time.

Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appears on www.ExaminerPolitics.com ExaminerPolitics.com



beltway confidential

In a television interview this afternoon, Democratic Tennessee Rep. Steve Cohen pronounced judgment on the doctors who were operating on Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa., when he died....

House Republican Leaders have sent a letter to the White House, imploring them to scrap their health care proposal and start from scratch at the upcoming health care summit that...

House Republican Leaders have sent a letter to the White House, imploring them to scrap their health care proposal and start from scratch at the upcoming health care summit that...

During our last big snowstorm, in December, I unearthed an old column by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., in which he claimed that the winters in D.C. have become anemic, that global...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

tyler

Oct 23, 2009

Why is there an advertisment for a government job on this site that takes up my whole screen and doesn't let me read any of the articles?

 

KC

Oct 23, 2009

The PUBLIC is right - fix the economy and get people back to work - forget this CRAP about health insurance - Dems can't figure out a way to fix it anyhow.
What they need to do is fix the health care, not add to it.

 

Bruce Majors

Oct 23, 2009

Michelle Obama created a job by becoming First Lady I bet. That giant hole she left in the University of Chicago Hospital's management when she left. I bet someone got that job no? I mean she was crucial to them. Surely. It wasn't just a featherbed job created to bribe her Senator hubbie to give them benies.

 

Bruce Majors

Oct 23, 2009

Maybe Anita Dunn, i.e.Mao, is right. You just cannot create full employment unless you get rid of 70 million excess workers and then send the rest out to do green technology farming (by hand without evil petroleum based technologies).

Maybe we should discuss it with her. A Mercedes Maoist, Ms.Dunn lives in a lovely $1.5 million house at 4413 Stanford Street in wealthy Chevy Chase, MD

 

depaz

Oct 23, 2009

to Bruce - Not only did Michelle create a job by becomming 1st Lady, she also created at least 15 jobs to establish her entourage. Many of them make over $100K a year. Of course that won't offset the millions of jobs that will be lost when Obama and his minions do in the insurance industry. . . .

 

torrin123

Oct 23, 2009

Hey Byron, I agree that any reform should be gradual and well-thought-out but I was wondering if I could see a link to the Gallup Poll that suggested that most Americans agree with us. Not that I don't believe you, I'd just like to see the proof in the pudding. Thanks.

 

csh

Oct 23, 2009

This is a case of the blind leading the
blind in the White House. They are focused on their own agenda and don't give a hoot about all of the poor people out of work. Linking health care to the ecomony, saying we can't have real recovery without health care
reform is simply "hogwash".

 

BackwardsBoy

Oct 23, 2009

Obama and his Democrat cronies have no intention of pulling us out of this recession. They crave a crisis, and a high number of unemployed people plays right into their hands.
Common sense solutions to our problems are the last thing this administration embraces. Lower taxes and reduced regulations will end the recession, but is that part of the Dems plans? Hardly.
The free market could work its wonders to reduce health care costs if it were allowed to do so. The current health care bill instead imposes a massively expensive and unecessary government intrusion into the system that is designed to fail. Why aren't health insurance companies allowed to compete with each other across state lines? Government regulations. Is this problem solved by health care reform? No.
The truly sad part of this mess is that we've elected politicians who don't care about Americans. This is our own fault.

 

JoAnn

Oct 23, 2009

2010 GOP slogan....."It's the Economy Stupid."

 

ladybug

Oct 23, 2009

Funny that James Carvelle has been remarkably silent on his mantra from the Clinton campaign when that was his reminder every time they started to wander.

 

Oct 23, 2009

The fact that the White House is more interested in attacking FOX NEWS than it is in creating jobs for the unemployed speaks loudly for this administration. Of course they could be
spending time on the war, but they have
better things to do. Fighting with your advocacies takes a lot of energy.

 

ilpalazzo

Oct 23, 2009

Isn't it obvious why his focus is healthcare? Because he knows that's all people are going to have from now on. With the intrusive government wrecking the economy and any chances to re-stabilize jobs, pretty soon we're all going to be split into the uber-elite in the ivory towers of luxury and the uber-poor that will have little to nothing.. but at least they'll get some short of crappy healthcare (Sadly those in favor of gov't healthcare haven't heard the phrase "You get what you pay for"). The gov't is just biding its time piddling around half-assed on every issue until their ideal model of sociali--, I mean, equality works out. And we, as Americans, are allowing it to happen.

 

junglejim123

Oct 23, 2009

What part of this stupid health care plan goes into effect immediately ?? Nothing except paybacks for George soros and others who backed Obama ...the rest takes effect in 2013.....so wheres this big hurry? People without jobs cannot wait ...this is urgent....but Obama doesnt care...he doesnt care about our soldiers either..hes just concerned with being a control freak and fighting with Fox News.... Fox refuses to be MSNBC and he cannot stand that. Good for Fox..stand your ground and keep exposing corruption in the Obama administrationa and among his allies like ACORN. Fox gives you concrete proof right from the culprits own mouths --- whereas MSNBC wants to talk about what outfit Michlle wore in the garden of evil and call you crazy if you dont love the Obamas... Sorry..many of us just arent feeling that Chrissy Matthews tingle up our legs.

 

jtrailroad

Oct 23, 2009

we need is jons,jobs,jobbs so where are the jobs pres Obama? only 30,000 were created! we neeed jobs or work for people got pay tthier bills ,rent and buy food along with energy bills

 

s. valenti

Oct 23, 2009

I've already decided not to support ANY democrat running for office in 2010. Simply expanding coverage is not the same thing as bringing down costs. That's what I've been waiting for all these years as premiums have continued to skyrocket. I'm outraged that Obama will fund this expansion on the backs of the middle class through the taxes he plans to impose on medical device makers and so-called 'cadillac' health plans. Does he really think we're so stupid that we don't get that those costs will be passed on to all of us?

Think about it. Many of those union plans (i.e., cadillac plans) are paid for by municipalities. Municipalities pay for those premiums through local taxes paid by us!

 

Letscheck

Oct 23, 2009

If Obama ever cared for one day about being a good President, then he would have been working on doing whatever was necessary to create jobs and a business friendly environment. Instead he is too busy taking over every aspect of the economy. Worst President ever.

 

Broke-Broke

Oct 23, 2009

The fierce urgency of now for me is NOW. I have enough to get thru Christmas then I will truly be broke. I refuse to not have a few gifts under the tree for my son so I will have completely maxed out my cards by New Year's. On those polls out there, can pollsters pls start asking which is more important to folks: healthcare or jobs? I urgently need to work. I've done w/out insurance for years; I can do without a little longer. In fact, I don't even want it. And another thing, how will jobless people pay for healthcare and or how will we afford the penalty for not having HC WITHOUT A JOB? Obama is doing a really lousy job at explaining these things.

 

Nick Beddoes

Oct 23, 2009

Of course we need to worry about our country's awful jobless rate (due largely to screwups by the greedy rich), but Byron York is wrong to play down the need for health care reform. Isn't he aware that 45,000 people die each year, more than 100 every day, because they can't get or afford health care? And doesn't this contribute to our economic slowness? C'mon, Byron, have a little more empathy for those who don't have cushy jobs like yours.

 

JohnR

Oct 23, 2009

Obama was actually behind in the polls last September...until the fiscal crisis. It's clear to me that people voted for Obama as a rejection of Bush and Neoconism and TO FIX THE ECONOMY. There was NO mandate for any of the garbage Obama has pulled so far (the non-stimulus bill, Cap & Trade, GM bailout, govt run health care). How ironic that the one mandate he really did have (to fix the economy) is the one he seems least interested in.

 

Nebuchadnezzar

Oct 23, 2009

Nick,

If the unemployed had good jobs most of them would have healthcare. C'mon Nick Utopia will never exist no matter how hard you wish for it.

 

Boriqua

Oct 23, 2009

To see a doctor is not a right
Insisting it’s so is sounding trite
The nature of life
Is struggle and strife
Without employment you lose the fight

 

leschwartz

Oct 23, 2009

I'm a Democrat, or at least progressive - liberal and YOU are absolutely right about JOBs, that should be the top priority.

But will either party go against the international corporations, Wall Street, international finance oligarchs who clearly intend to make the average American as poor as Mexicans and Chinese?

 

Pat L

Oct 23, 2009

The story I read recently about Michelle Obama's job is that she started with a huge salary, which was increased enormously just prior to the hospital getting a big government grant (imagine). She worked 20 hours a week. When she left to become first lady, she was not replaced. I also read that she complained about the work she had to do while she held the job.

 

mnemos

Oct 23, 2009

Please remove the part of the post above that shows the address.

 

RoseC

Oct 23, 2009

The American people were promised jobs but instead they are jobless and more banks are scheduled to close and more businesses after the holidays. It appears that the federal government is on the path to destroying the middle class and controlling the American people in violation of the Constitution which they are trampling upon. The United States is a corporation and the federal government are a Board of Directors and the U.S. Citizens/taxpayers are the stockholders and aren't getting anything but false promises and a dictatorial government shoving unconstitutional laws down our throat and if you don't like it then you'll be punished! What laws are they applying to take over private enterprise and raise taxes and print unaccountable phantom tax dollars instead of creating jobs? What good is health care if no one is working?

 

John D. Froelich

Oct 23, 2009

Presidential term: 4 years
In ten days, one down, three to go.

 

valwayne

Oct 23, 2009

The real question is why Obama and the Democrats don't seem to care much about 9.8% UNEMPLOYMENT which is surging to 15%? About millions upon millions of UNEMPLOYED? Or why they are pushing a plan they know will cost trillions upon trillions when they have plunged the country into more debt and printed money than in the history of the world. Why are their income redistribution plans more important to them than the health of the American economy and jobs for the American people? The experts are already telling us we will have double digit unemployment and an economy in recession or near to it for years or decades. What are Obama and the Democrats doing?

 

mulp

Oct 23, 2009

How much longer are we supposed to wait for the Republican tax relief to work?

We have the lowest tax collections since 1945, down to 15% of GDP from the 21% of GDP when the economy was booming in 1999 and taxes were considered too high because government debt would be paid off and there would be no safe, high interest US Treasuries to invest in.

Now everyone is complaining that the Republican tax cuts to increase the amount of US Treasury debt is a bad thing. Why?

And what was wrong with the booming Clinton economy that resulted from the Bush and Clinton tax hikes in the early 90s? Was the problem too much economic growth? If too much growth, then cutting taxes was the sure fire way to ceating a long recession.

On the other hand, if the economy was growing too slowly in the 90s, then the answer was a tax hike back to the even faster growth of LBJ when taxes were higher.

 

Charles Schapira

Oct 24, 2009

Even Obama and the Democrats don't have a real sense of urgency about Health Care Reform. There is certainly no "fierce urgency" in the structure and timing of their Health Care Reform plans. Their program is not even scheduled to be implemented until after the next presidential election, beginning in 2013. Clearly, they are maneuvering politically to secure another 4 years before their program hits the fan. The good news in this timing is that any program that Obama may happen to pass into law could be easily dismantled and we would have 3 years to do it!

 

Letscheck

Oct 24, 2009

Thank you Mr. York. I have been saying this all over message boards for months. If Obama wants to be a good President then his first priority would be on creating a favorable climate for small business and job creation.

If Obama is not focused on jobs, then he is just a man who became President with an agenda that fits what he wants as opposed to what is best for America and the citizens of this country.

I think we have a clear answer, with exclamation points this past week: The President of the United States has an agenda that over rides what is in the best interest of the American people.

Worst President ever.

 

Letscheck

Oct 24, 2009

Mulp are you just kidding or what. Forget trying to blame this on Bush. It is Obama who has lost over 2 million jobs and raised the deficit by trillions just in the last nine months.

Try to keep up instead of visiting the past. It is your future that is at stake when you display ignorance about what is happening around you every single day yet your mind goes blank over the past year and throws back to earlier years.

Get a grip...it is you life going down the tubes under Obama. This is going on right now, in your face and you are not seeing it.

 

Rod

Oct 24, 2009

Forget healthcare reform except for across state line shopping.

US underutilization of labor is now 17 percent, which is a better indication of how bad things are than the unemployment figure.

Obama needs to help small business, which means quit spending money and cut taxes of business and individuals. Eliminate regulations that hinder the private market. Let failing businesses fail. Quit trying to micromanage the economy. Abolish the federal reserve.

 

Oct 24, 2009

Charles Schapira,

It would take a Republican majority in the House, a 60 vote majority in the Senate, and a Republican president to dismantle it. Maybe a simple Republican majority in the House could defund it. Maybe the Supreme Court will find it unconstitutional.

This bill is more about govt takeover of 1/6th of the economy than it is about healtcare. The fact is, it will ruin the US healthcare system. All so that Dems can get more and more centralized, collectivized govt control.

 

Oct 24, 2009

mulp,

The US corporate tax rate has been the second highest in the world for years. This makes US corps non-competetive on the world market, with the consequence that we have had a negative trade deficit for years. The negative trade deficit means the US is a net consumer nation. We need to become a net producer nation so that the dollar slide can be reversed and so that American can begin to rebuild wealth. It took a long time for this situation to build and it will take time to correct. But we have no choice other than to start now, otherwise it will only get worse.

 

Rod

Oct 24, 2009

mulp,
You are correct that revenues are down. As unemployment increases revenue collections decline. As more and more economy choking measures are adopted, fewer jobs contribute to tax collections. Which further exacerbates economic activity. You can see that there comes a point where almost nothing can save the economy. More govt restrictions, spending, and taxation is precisely the wrong direction.

 

Ron

Oct 24, 2009

You can't simply manufacture jobs like you can widgets. The situation we find our selves in goes back many years. We have gone from a manufacturing economy to a service economy over a 40 year period, chasing good paying manufacturing jobs overseas at an alarming rate. We don't make the things anybody wants to buy anymore. We have largely ignored further development of our natural resources because of environmental regulations and no longer have a resource infrastructure. None of this will be fixed in our lifetimes. It has taken forty years for us to get here.

 

Dude

Oct 24, 2009

What we really need are jobs, energy independence and for government to get out of the way. What we got is 10% unemployment (some say permanently now), more dependence on foreign oil for the next 20 years because of cultist beliefs from the left (strange irony there)and socialism that would make Karl Marx proud.

 

Victim of Hope and Change

Oct 24, 2009

I need a job now, then I can buy my own healthcare.

Obama's big fat "Curious George" ears just are not listening to the Americans who are not working.

 

Tag44

Oct 26, 2009

Thanks for the post and for the very resourceful information shared.

 

silverbullet

Oct 27, 2009

Oct 23, 2009

Maybe Anita Dunn, i.e.Mao, is right. You just cannot create full employment unless you get rid of 70 million excess workers and then send the rest out to do green technology farming (by hand without evil petroleum based technologies).

Maybe we should discuss it with her. A Mercedes Maoist, Ms.Dunn lives in a lovely $1.5 million house at 4413 Stanford Street in wealthy Chevy Chase, MD

 

silverbullet

Oct 27, 2009

Oct 23, 2009

Maybe Anita Dunn, i.e.Mao, is right. You just cannot create full employment unless you get rid of 70 million excess workers and then send the rest out to do green technology farming (by hand without evil petroleum based technologies).

Maybe we should discuss it with her. A Mercedes Maoist, Ms.Dunn lives in a lovely $1.5 million house at 4413 Stanford Street in wealthy Chevy Chase, MD

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Slideshow: Washington area snow photos

Here are some of the best snow photos in the DC area from the Associated Press, the Examiner' s own Andrew Harnik and courtesy photos from Kathleen Dellinger: Full story

Politics

Rep. John Murtha dies at 77

A spokesman says Democratic Rep. John Murtha of... Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story