Politico’s Alexander Burns has published a story titled: “Abortion was winning issue for Democrats in 2010.”
By branding Republican challengers as outside the cultural mainstream on the issue, Democrats managed to hold on to at least a slice of the political center by courting and winning over moderate women in a handful of key states.
The Senate races cited by Burns are Nevada, California, Colorado, and Washington, but the evidence that the abortion issue tipped the scales is not very persuasive.
Burns writes of the Nevada race:
But at the very same time Nevada voters defeated antiabortion Senate candidate Sharron Angle 50% to 45%, they voted for antiabortion gubernatorial candidate Brian Sandoval
Running against someone who opposes abortion in the case of rape is not quite the same thing as
asdfasdf:
Like most California Democrats, Boxer ended up winning reelection comfortably — unlike the razor-thin victory margins in Colorado and Washington, the Democrat prevailed by nearly 10 points.
Still, abortion rights supporters believe the issue played a role in Fiorina’s defeat: A survey from the Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, taken on the eve of the Nov. 2 election, showed that 52 percent of voters who had heard about abortion in the context of the Senate race were less likely to support the Republican.
asfasdf
Ignores
