Salzberg, a University of Maryland scientist, is co-founder of a new online influenza journal through the Public Library of Science. Organizers hope that the Internet format will allow scientists to share information with each other — and the public — without a delay of weeks or months on the old peer review style of preparing journals.
What made you decide to get involved?
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Already a member? Log in
David Lipman in the [National Institutes of Health] should get the most credit. David and I started talking about it *** back in the spring, when the H1N1 was turning into a pandemic. The usual suspects — experts in influenza — were talking amongst themselves, and then there were some other scientists who were talking amongst themselves. But we discovered that there wasn’t a way to get these communications out into the open. Scientists want to get credit. But once a paper is accepted by a journal, it’s embargoed. There’s an inherent conflict there. This journal is an attempt to get around that.
How are other scientists responding to this?
Actually, the response has been remarkably good. I don’t know — I can’t even count how many papers we’ve gotten.
How have you and the team responded to the demands of quick edit?
We’ve been reviewing and accepting things within a day. But there’s about 30 moderators. I’ve only reviewed one. So it’s not too bad.
What’s the craziest submission?
There’s one that I shouldn’t even say. It was one that I laughed at. People were sending in things saying, “Here’s what the flu is.” And it was like on a high school level. There was one about influenza and diet. I think they were just making it up.
Can a layman understand what’s being published?
You can understand the title and the abstract, yes. Just go to our Web site (plos.org).
– Bill Myers
