Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary?

Published



Many of my friends think Hiroshima was an unjustifiable atrocity. My usual course in atom-bomb disputes is to refer the belligerent to Donald Kagan’s brilliant 1995 piece in Commentary, “Why America Dropped the Bomb.” The reaction is consistent, and surprising: My friends do not challenge any of Kagan’s assertions as inaccurate, but they remain unswayed. The idea that atom-bombing a city could ever be necessary is too far outside their frame of reference. It is a concept from a different world, beyond believing.

During the war, my grandmother walked to school along Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn, and she saw gold stars in people’s windows. She was a young girl, but she knew what they meant—each marked a home to which a young man would never return. “You can talk about war theoretically,” she told me, “but seeing a gold star in the window . . .” she let the thought complete itself. I have never seen a gold star hanging in a window, and none of my friends even knew what one was. We are fantastically lucky: we have never had to worry about the draft. War, for most of us—even post-9/11—remains a distant and academic unreality. We owe it to those gold stars to understand how we got here.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.