{"Articles":[ {"id":"3132228-1724374758", "title":"Delegates express disappointment at Beyonce no-show but say Harris ‘made up for it’", "sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fpresidential%2F3132228%2Fdnc-delegates-disappointment-beyonce-no-show%2F", "byline":"Hailey Bullis, Mabinty Quarshie and Samantha-Jo Roth", "publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500", "synopsis":"CHICAGO — Hopes that Beyonce would make a surprise appearance on the closing night of the Democratic National Convention were dashed after the night ended with no sign of the “Freedom” singer. The evening was packed with celebrities, with musicians such as Pink and the Chicks taking the stage on the grand finale of the […]", "description":""
CHICAGO \u2014 Hopes that Beyonce<\/a> would make a surprise appearance on the closing night of the Democratic National Convention<\/a> were dashed after the night ended with no sign of the \u201cFreedom\u201d singer.<\/p> The evening was packed with celebrities<\/a>, with musicians such as Pink and the Chicks taking the stage on the grand finale of the DNC. The event drew so many attendees that the convention floor was completely closed off hours before Vice President Kamala Harris took the stage to deliver the DNC\u2019s closing speech.The A-lister delegates and attendees were most excited to see, however, was Beyonce. Speculation mounted throughout the week, and hit a fever pitch Thursday, that Beyonce would perform on the final night of the DNC.Maryland delegate Roxanne Brown, 45, said she was let down that Beyonce did not end up appearing. However, Brown said that the letdown was OK, though, because \u201cKamala made up for it.\u201d\u201cI was disappointed because I was looking forward to seeing Beyonce, but I was most looking forward to watching history, which is a nomination of our first black female president,\u201d Brown said.<\/p> Another Maryland delegate, Lily Qi, 60, said she would have loved to see the pop sensation, but she echoed Brown\u2019s sentiment that supporting Harris was the most important part of the night.\u201cI would have loved to see her and her energy, and she's an icon, a cultural icon, as I understand,\u201d Qi said. \u201cBut you know, this is not why I'm here, of course, right? I am here to make sure that Kamala Harris is elected.\u201d<\/p> Erica Harrison, a stay-at-home mother from North Carolina, captured the anticipation. \"I was getting excited. I told my husband, I thought that Beyonce would come out and perform and sing 'Freedom,' but I was wrong.\"<\/p> \"The entire thing was a surreal moment. I'm still on a high,\" she said. \"So even though Beyonce didn't come, she would have just been a little cherry on top. But everything else was amazing.\"Rumors had been swirling that the DNC would feature a special guest for days, with musician Taylor Swift also being floated as a possibility. But Beyonce was the chief figure speculated to make an appearance.Excitement over the possibility of Beyonce's DNC appearance hit a fever pitch Thursday after White House political director Emily Ruiz posted a bee emoji, which is linked to Beyonce as her fanbase is referred to as the \u201cBeyHive.\u201dRuiz later posted an apology, saying, \u201cSorry guys my 6-year-old took my phone.\u201d<\/p> Democratic Party Chairman Jaime Harrison also dodged confirming or denying<\/a> whether Beyonce would appear during an appearance on CBS Mornings.Conflicting reports about whether or not the iconic singer would appear were published by multiple outlets. TMZ published a report earlier on Thursday saying that multiple sources told the outlet she would be the surprise performer speculated.However, as the final night\u2019s programming was underway, a representative for Beyonce told the Hollywood Reporter that she was \u201cnever scheduled to be there\u201d and that \u201cthe report of a performance is untrue.\u201dA Washington Examiner reporter overheard attendees exiting the United Center expressing disappointment the singer didn\u2019t show, with one exclaiming, \u201cBut we didn\u2019t get Beyonce!\u201dNevertheless, Maine delegate Eric Best said while he wanted to \u201cbe able to brag to my kids that I was there when Beyonce showed up,\u201d he did not feel like his \u201clife was diminished by the fact that she didn't.\u201d<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> New York delegate Alicia Hyndman, 52, said she thought it was for the best that Beyonce didn\u2019t show.<\/p> \u201cI felt if Beyonce came, it would have been too celebrity,\u201d Hyndman said. \u201cI think would have been playing into the opposition's playbook like big Hollywood.\u201d<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/beyonce_noshow_dnc.webp?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3085609-1721196000",
"title":"Sen. Whitehouse’s attacks on fossil energy producers are incoherent",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3085609%2Fsen-whitehouse-attacks-fossil-energy-producers-incoherent%2F",
"byline":"Benjamin Zycher",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"It might seem difficult to take positions on a prominent issue diametrically opposed and equally preposterous. But Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), a man whose Pavlovian opposition to the U.S. fossil energy producers has led him into incoherence rare even by Beltway standards, has achieved just such a magical trick. Whitehouse, the chairman of the Senate […]",
"description":"" It might seem difficult to take positions on a prominent issue diametrically opposed and equally preposterous. But Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), a man whose Pavlovian opposition to the U.S. fossil energy producers has led him into incoherence rare even by Beltway standards, has achieved just such a magical trick.<\/p> Whitehouse, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, for years has accused<\/a> the major U.S. fossil energy producers of creating the purported climate \u201ccrisis\u201d and hiding their knowledge<\/a> of and deceiving the public<\/a> about the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions. Translation: For decades, the U.S. fossil energy sector has produced too much energy and thus too many greenhouse gas emissions.\u00a0<\/p> Alas, that stance is so yesterday. Whitehouse\u2019s new argument<\/a> is that \u201coil and gas companies could be engaging in collusive, anti-competitive activities with OPEC+ that would raise crude oil prices.\u201d So now the U.S. fossil energy producers in cahoots with OPEC+ might be producing too little.\u00a0<\/p> With respect to Whitehouse\u2019s collusion argument: Perhaps Whitehouse should call President Joe Biden as a witness for a Budget Committee hearing, as it was Biden who in October 2022 asked<\/a> the Saudis to delay a scheduled production cut until after the midterm elections.\u00a0<\/p> More generally, it is the Biden administration that has taken hundreds of actions<\/a> making U.S. fossil energy production more difficult and costly. It is the Biden administration that has tried to hide the attendant adverse price effects by using<\/a> the Strategic Petroleum Reserve<\/a> and other government stockpiles<\/a> to manipulate short-run supplies in a wholly ad hoc fashion \u2014 that is, for purely political purposes.\u00a0<\/p> If U.S. producers are \u201ccolluding\u201d with OPEC+ to restrict output, they are doing a rather bad job of it. Since March 2021, when real U.S. gross domestic product growth was about 5%, U.S. crude oil output<\/a> has increased by 13%. U.S. natural gas production<\/a> has increased by more than 5%. U.S. refinery capacity utilization<\/a> has increased from 81.9% to 89.7%, refinery use<\/a> of crude oil and other inputs has increased by 10.7%, and refinery output<\/a> of products has increased by 8%. OPEC+ output<\/a> is about the same as in early 2021, while non-U.S. output<\/a> in the rest of the world has increased by almost 4%.<\/p> With respect to Whitehouse\u2019s climate \u201cresponsibility\u201d and \u201cdeception\u201d assertions: U.S. greenhouse gas emissions from all combustion of fossil fuels<\/a> are about 74% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions<\/a>. Elimination of all U.S. fossil fuel combustion emissions would reduce global temperatures in 2100 by 0.077 degrees Celcius, applying the Environmental Protection Agency climate model<\/a> under realistic assumptions. That effect would not be detectable.<\/p> Accordingly, someone should ask Whitehouse to explain the precise sense in which U.S. fossil energy producers are \u201cresponsible\u201d for the asserted climate crisis (for which, by the way, there is no evidence<\/a>). That is the relevant question in particular given that reduced output by U.S. producers would be offset largely or wholly with increased production by foreign producers.\u00a0<\/p> Whitehouse continues<\/a>, \u201cFor decades, the fossil fuel industry has known about the economic and climate harms of its products.\u201d The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its 1990 First Assessment Report made it clear that it could not explain why temperatures were higher 5,000-6,000 years ago despite no evidence of an increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. Fast forward to the Sixth Assessment Report<\/a>: IPCC still cannot narrow down the \u201clikely\u201d range of climate effects of increased greenhouse gas concentrations. And the IPCC climate models<\/a> continue to overstate the atmospheric temperature record by a factor of over 2.3<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p> In short, according to Whitehouse the fossil energy producers for decades have \u201cknown\u201d things that were not known in 1990 and are not known now. They are producing too little energy and too much. Such are the Schr\u00f6dinger-like fruits of a stance wholly ideological, impervious to facts, and oblivious to the real investment and economic harm caused by the Beltway blame game. <\/p> Whitehouse\u2019s \u201cinvestigations\u201d have produced no useful information but gobs of Beltway propaganda: \u201cIf it is an election year, the fossil energy producers must be guilty of something.\u201d Is this the best he can do? The evidence says yes.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM RESTORING AMERICA<\/a><\/p> Benjamin Zycher is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/AP22080625251491.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3081706-1720960622",
"title":"DHS pressed for clarity on Secret Service protocols to ‘assess threats’ after Trump rally shooting",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fhouse%2F3081706%2Fdhs-pressed-clarity-secret-service-protocols-trump-rally-shooting%2F",
"byline":"Cami Mondeaux",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-TN) is pressing the Department of Homeland Security to provide clarity on how Secret Service members are trained to respond to threats after a shooting broke out at former President Donald Trump’s rally on Saturday. In a letter sent to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Sunday, Green pressed […]",
"description":"" House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-TN) is pressing the Department of Homeland Security to provide clarity on how Secret Service members are trained to respond to threats after a shooting broke out<\/a> at former President Donald Trump's rally on Saturday.<\/p> In a letter<\/a> sent to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Sunday, Green pressed the top Biden administration official to provide information or any documentation related to security detail at Trump's rally<\/a> in Butler, Pennsylvania. Green praised the \"swift response\" of the Secret Service members but argued the DHS must be investigated for some reports that suggest the department rebuffed \"multiple requests\" from Trump's security team to \"increase protective services\" ahead of the event. <\/p> \u201cThe seriousness of this security failure and chilling moment in our nation\u2019s history cannot be understated,\" Green wrote. \"As the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) investigates, the Committee on Homeland Security (Committee) is dedicated to conducting rigorous oversight to ensure that the American people receive answers and presidential candidates receive proper and adequate protection.\"<\/p> Green outlined a number of questions he wants to be answered by the department, including access to all documents and communications within the DHS and Secret Service related to \"any potential increase or addition of protective resources to President Trump\u2019s security detail\" from mid-November to the present day.<\/p> The letter also requests information on Secret Service<\/a> rules of engagement protocols \u201cto assess and neutralize threats\u201d after concerns were raised about how the shooter \"was able to access a rooftop within range and direct line of sight of where President Trump was speaking.\"<\/p> Green's requests come as lawmakers from both parties have responded swiftly to the shooting and have begun to reconsider security protocols in Congress. House Republicans are scheduled to have a briefing with the sergeant-at-arms on Sunday afternoon, one lawmaker told the Washington Examiner. <\/p> Reps. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and Mike Lawler (R-NY) also announced they would be introducing a bill that would provide enhanced Secret Service protection to Trump as well as President Joe Biden and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.<\/a> while on the campaign trail.<\/p> \"As reports continue to emerge, it\u2019s clear that more protection is needed for all major candidates for president,\" the two said in a joint statement. \"That\u2019s why we\u2019re planning on introducing bipartisan legislation providing President Joe Biden, former President Donald Trump, and presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. with enhanced Secret Service protection. Anything less would be a disservice to our democracy.\u201d<\/p> The FBI identified the shooter as Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, of Bethel, Pennsylvania, on Sunday morning. Crooks died shortly after the shooting after being \"neutralized\" by the Secret Service, agency spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said in a statement. At least one rally attendee was also killed. <\/p> Trump was taken to a nearby hospital<\/a> to be treated after confirming he was pierced in the upper part of his right ear.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> \u201cI knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place,\u201d he wrote in a Truth Social Post. <\/p> The former president<\/a> is in stable condition. Trump later flew to New Jersey after being released from the hospital. He is expected to travel to Milwaukee for the Republican National Convention that begins on Monday.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/secret-service-44.webp?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3077696-1720701634",
"title":"Johnson quiets initial concerns about fundraising prowess by raising $23.5 million in second quarter",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fcongressional%2F3077696%2Fjohnson-quiets-initial-concerns-about-fundraising-prowess-by-raising-23-5-million-in-second-quarter%2F",
"byline":"Cami Mondeaux",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) raised $23.5 million in the second quarter of 2024, outperforming expectations and continuing to quiet initial concerns about his fundraising prowess when he took the gavel last October. More than $17 million of that haul went toward Johnson’s committees with the remaining $6.5 million going toward individual members and GOP […]",
"description":"" House Speaker Mike Johnson<\/a> (R-LA) raised $23.5 million in the second quarter of 2024, outperforming expectations and continuing to quiet initial concerns about his fundraising<\/a> prowess when he took the gavel last October.<\/p> More than $17 million of that haul went toward Johnson's committees with the remaining $6.5 million going toward individual members and GOP candidates. Additionally, Johnson has now transferred more than $16 million to the National Republican Congressional Committee<\/a> this cycle as part of efforts to grow the party's slim House majority next year. <\/p> \u201cWith commonsense solutions, strong candidates, and momentum growing every day, another extraordinary quarter shows Republicans are expanding our base and energized to win up and down the ballot in November,\u201d Johnson said in a statement. \u201cAs we gather in Milwaukee next week to officially nominate President Donald Trump, our Party has never been more unified and equipped with the resources needed to grow the House majority, win the Senate, and win the White House.\u201d<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> Johnson's second-quarter haul builds on other House GOP leaders' fundraising for a total of $45 million raised during the second quarter, when combining the speaker's numbers with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA), Minority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN), and GOP Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY). <\/p> Johnson's fundraising still falls slightly behind his predecessor, former Speaker Kevin McCarthy<\/a> (R-CA), but the high numbers offer hope to Republicans that the speaker is able to raise large sums for the party despite only holding the gavel for nine months.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/AP24178017398020-scaled.webp?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3074143-1720513167",
"title":"State program spends $1 million to get 37 ‘disadvantaged’ people drivers licenses",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2F3074143%2Fstate-program-spends-1-million-to-get-37-disadvantaged-people-drivers-licenses%2F",
"byline":"TJ Martinell | The Center Square",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"(The Center Square) – A program set up in King County through the state Department of Licensing and funded by the state Legislature has spent nearly $1 million teaching “disadvantaged” women to drive, with just 37 women actually obtaining their license in a five-month period. King County contracts with Mujer al Volante, a nonprofit organization in […]",
"description":"" (The Center Square)\u00a0\u2013 A program set up in King County through the state Department of Licensing and funded by the state Legislature has spent nearly $1 million teaching \u201cdisadvantaged\u201d women to drive, with just 37 women actually obtaining their license in a five-month period.<\/p> King County contracts with Mujer al Volante, a nonprofit organization in Seattle that offers support services to refugee and immigrant women. In 2022, the Legislature gave DOL $350,000 to also contract with the nonprofit, with an additional $2 million appropriated earlier this year in the state transportation budget.<\/p> The Drivers License Assistance Program \u201cTaking the Steering Wheel of My Life\u201d provides qualifying applicants assistance toward obtaining a driver\u2019s license. To qualify, a person must be a woman or \u201cnonbinary,\u201d an immigrant, asylee, or refugee, and be classified as \"low-income.\"<\/p> Since the program started in December, there have been 522 individuals who have gone through the program. However, just 37 of them have successfully passed the written and driving exams. In January, there were 101 participants and only one of them obtained their license. In April, there were 132 participants, 13 of which got their license.<\/p> When The Center Square reached out to DOL for comment, Communications Manager Christine Anthony wrote that \u201cwe contracted with Mujer al Volante in December of 2023, and this is the first report to the Legislature. This is a new program we are administering, and we will continue to work with the organization and monitor their progress.\u201d<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AP24014160536170-1-scaled.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3072819-1720443053",
"title":"Sorry, progressives, but facts can’t be racist",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3072819%2Fsorry-progressives-but-facts-cant-be-racist%2F",
"byline":"Brad Polumbo",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Facts cannot be racist. But that hasn’t stopped many liberal media figures and Democratic politicians from trying to insist otherwise after one conservative writer dared to point out what we all know about Vice President Kamala Harris: She wouldn’t be where she is now without the movement for DEI, also known as diversity, equity, and […]",
"description":"" Facts cannot be racist. But that hasn\u2019t stopped many liberal media<\/a> figures and Democratic politicians from trying to insist otherwise after one conservative writer dared to point out what we all know about Vice President Kamala Harris<\/a>: She wouldn\u2019t be where she is now without the movement for DEI<\/a>, also known as diversity, equity, and inclusion.\u00a0<\/p> In an article<\/a> that went viral, Charles Gasparino wrote that if she is successfully put forward as President Joe Biden\u2019s<\/a> successor, Harris will be \u201cthe country\u2019s first DEI president.\u201d Suffice it to say, this did not go over well.\u00a0<\/p> Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) tweeted<\/a> out the headline and said, \u201cThis is straight-up racist.\u201d\u00a0<\/p> Meanwhile, the account \u201cRacism Watch Dog\u201d shared the article and said<\/a>, \u201cBark bark bark,\u201d in a post that 4.7 million people have seen.\u00a0<\/p> Another viral tweet<\/a> accused the article of \u201cfinding a way to spell the nword with only 3 characters.\u201d<\/p> You get the idea: How dare conservatives label Kamala Harris a diversity pick. That\u2019s obviously racist and hateful! <\/p> There\u2019s just one problem, however. It is a fact that Harris was selected to be Biden\u2019s vice president in part due to her race and gender. It is a fact that if she had been a white male but otherwise remained a California senator, Harris never would\u2019ve been selected as his running mate.\u00a0<\/p> You don\u2019t have to take my word for it. Just ask Biden. During the 2020 presidential campaign, Biden openly said, in explicit terms<\/a>, that he was only considering women to be his vice president, and he strongly implied<\/a> that he would favor a woman of color.\u00a0<\/p> That\u2019s right: We know for a fact that, but for her gender, Harris never would\u2019ve been selected as vice president. (And if not for that, she certainly wouldn\u2019t be at the forefront of the conversation for a potential Biden replacement.) So, to call her a diversity or \u201cDEI\u201d pick is not an opinion that can be characterized as racist: It is an observation of a fact.\u00a0<\/p> When I pointed this out on X, many of the same liberals and progressives got upset with me as well. <\/p> But a fact that upsets people continues to be a fact. And none of their counterarguments change the fact that Harris, no matter how one feels about it, owes her current position in part to the Democrats\u2019 blatant identity politics and openly discriminatory pursuit of diversity.\u00a0<\/p> Some critics pointed out that Harris isn\u2019t unqualified for vice president, arguing that as a former senator and state attorney general, she has similar qualifications to past vice presidential picks, such as Biden when he served under President Barack Obama. Yet this is something of a non sequitur because to say that Harris was a diversity selection is not to say she\u2019s totally unqualified for the job.\u00a0<\/p> For example, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is objectively a \u201cdiversity pick\u201d because Biden openly said he was only considering black women for the job. Yet Jackson is also eminently qualified for the position \u2014 she was simply elevated above others due to her immutable characteristics. These two things can and do coexist with regularity.\u00a0<\/p> DEI picks rarely, if ever, result in a situation where someone totally unqualified is picked for a job. But someone is a diversity hire if, but for her immutable characteristics, she would not have been given the role under a strictly meritocratic selection. And that is almost certainly the case for Harris. After all, according to Biden himself, she was selected through a process in which more than half of the alternatives, males, were ruled out due to their gender and white females were seemingly disfavored. That left only her and a handful of other minority women<\/a> who were high-ranking Democratic officials from which Biden could choose.<\/p> And beyond her identity, Harris didn\u2019t add much to the ticket. She wasn\u2019t from a swing state. She had never won a competitive election against a Republican. She wasn\u2019t popular with the Democratic base, having failed horrifically in her own presidential bid. She wasn\u2019t even popular in the primary with black voters, a group from whom Biden already had strong support. And she was prone to cringeworthy moments and had the campaign trail charisma of a wet towel.\u00a0<\/p> Harris\u2019s main \u201cvalue add\u201d for Biden\u2019s ticket was that she was a woman of color. We all knew it then, and we all know it now. <\/p> Another counterargument is that vice presidents are often selected due to factors not directly related to merit. That may be true, but it shouldn\u2019t be. And it doesn\u2019t make racial favoritism any less morally detestable. It also doesn\u2019t make the charge that Harris is a DEI pick less true. If anything, it just offers context to better understand the significance of this truth.\u00a0<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> So, too, some critics have yelled, \u201cBut Trump!\u201d, as they are wont to do, and they have pointed out that President Donald Trump did something similar when he appointed Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett after promising to appoint a woman. Yet this whataboutism isn\u2019t a refutation of the actual charge. It just means that Barrett was also a DEI pick, as some acknowledged at the time. (If their point was just that Republicans can be hypocrites, they\u2019d have no argument from me!)<\/p> We simply cannot let Democrats and progressives make noticing facts they find inconvenient off-limits by throwing around false charges of racism. No matter how hard some on the Left insist, facts can never be racist, and the moment we cave to that ridiculous framing, we lose the ability to discuss the truth and cede the political conversation to whoever is willing to cry \u201cvictim\u201d the loudest. <\/p> Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo<\/a>) is an independent journalist, YouTuber<\/a>, and a co-founder of BASEDPolitics.<\/a><\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/AP24188824437913-scaled.webp?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3071849-1720418400",
"title":"Increasing economic growth should be top priority",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3071849%2Fincreasing-economic-growth-should-be-top-priority%2F",
"byline":"Bruce Thompson",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"For the past three and a half years, the U.S. economy has struggled under the economic policies of the Biden administration and congressional Democrats. Increased taxes, spending, deficits, and debt have produced higher prices, lower wages, soaring interest rates, and slower economic growth. For typical American families, the Biden administration’s policies have resulted in lower […]",
"description":"" For the past three and a half years, the U.S. economy<\/a> has struggled under the economic<\/a> policies of the Biden administration<\/a> and congressional Democrats.\u00a0<\/p> Increased taxes, spending, deficits, and debt have produced higher prices, lower wages, soaring interest rates, and slower economic growth. For typical American families, the Biden administration's policies have resulted in lower standards of living and dashed hopes of a better future. <\/p> While the inflation<\/a> rate has eased from its 9.1% peak, the highest level in 40 years, prices are still up 20% since Biden took office, far outpacing the increase in wages.<\/p> Millions of Americans are financially stressed, unable to buy a home, pay off their debt, or save for the future<\/a>. Household debt <\/a>is at an all-time high, up $3 trillion, or 21%, since the first quarter of 2021.\u00a0<\/p> Along with these high prices, the U.S. economy is stuck in a slow growth rut. The latest numbers<\/a> show the economy is slowing under high interest rates and persistent inflation, with personal spending and capital goods orders weakening.\u00a0<\/p> Real gross domestic product (GDP) grew at only 1.4%<\/a>\u00a0 last quarter, the slowest growth in nearly two years. In the last nine quarters, economic growth has averaged only half our historic growth rate.\u00a0<\/p> The U.S. needs to adopt pro-growth policies to encourage faster economic growth. But if Biden and congressional Democrats are given another chance in November, we face even higher taxes, more spending, and slower growth. They are already planning to leverage the 2025<\/a> debate over extending the 2017 tax cuts to force the largest tax increase in our history.\u00a0<\/p> They are drafting plans to raise taxes on individual taxpayers and American businesses, actions, which could tip the economy into a recession and result in larger deficits and debt<\/a>.<\/p> The Biden administration\u2019s most harmful proposal would raise the U.S. corporate tax rate to one of the highest in the world. This would be a major economic mistake. Increasing the corporate rate is the most economically damaging tax increase, and raising this tax<\/a> in a weak economy would cause it to lose more revenue than it gained, likely triggering an eventual economic collapse.<\/p> Numerous studies have shown that raising the corporate rate would have a harmful effect on working families, lowering their wages and incomes, increasing the prices they pay, and reducing their retirement<\/a>\u00a0 savings. A Federal Reserve study <\/a>found that a higher corporate tax rate would be \u201cuniformly harmful\u201d to working people, leading to \u201csignificant reductions \u201c in their jobs and incomes.<\/p> Increasing the corporate tax rate would also put U.S. companies at a significant competitive disadvantage against our global competitors. Under the Biden administration, the U.S. rate<\/a> would be higher than every other country we compete against, reducing investment in America and shifting profits and jobs overseas.\u00a0<\/p> Americans faced similar financial challenges of high prices, stagnant growth, and soaring taxes and spending 44 years ago. The Republican Party platform in 1980 stated that nothing was more important than economic growth, and endorsed the Reagan economic recovery program<\/a> of lower tax rates and spending cuts.\u00a0<\/p> Once passed, the Reagan tax cuts <\/a>and spending reforms kicked off an economic boom, with real GDP growth reaching\u00a0 7% in 1983 and 8% in 1984, and averaging nearly 5% a year through 1988. Inflation dropped from 11% to 4% and nearly 20 million jobs were created in the largest peacetime expansion in U.S. history.\u00a0<\/p> The Reagan tax cuts were modeled after the Kennedy tax cuts in the 1960s, which also set off an economic growth boom, with real growth averaging more than 5% a year. The Reagan-Kennedy tax cuts led to extended periods of unprecedented economic growth<\/a> and a higher standard of living for all Americans.\u00a0<\/p> Under our current path of high taxes and spending, the economic outlook is dim. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is forecasting<\/a> 10 years of dismal and weak growth averaging 1.8% a year,\u00a0 much lower than the 3.5% average annual growth the U.S. experienced from 1960 to 2000. If that happens, we will have a decade of lower incomes, fewer jobs, and countless lost opportunities.<\/a>\u00a0<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> But it does not have to be this way. As we have seen, an economic policy of low tax rates and fiscal restraint can increase investment, productivity, and output, leading to higher incomes and faster growth. Pro-growth tax policies that increase the incentive to work, save, and invest, along with spending restraint, would improve economic growth, getting us out of our slow growth rut and returning the economy to its historic growth rate<\/a>. <\/p> Higher economic growth would generate trillions of dollars of economic activity, leading to higher wages and incomes, better jobs and opportunities, and more prosperity for all Americans. We cannot settle for another 10 years of subpar growth. Increasing economic growth should be our top priority. <\/p> Bruce Thompson was a U.S. Senate aide, assistant secretary of Treasury for legislative affairs, and the director of government relations for Merrill Lynch for 22 years.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/AP23315572079441.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3069418-1720072800",
"title":"Is the American dream dead? My family’s story proves otherwise",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3069418%2Fis-the-american-dream-dead-my-familys-story-proves-otherwise%2F",
"byline":"Hera Varmah",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"The American dream has been woven into countless narratives throughout my life, shaped by the inspiring stories shared by my family members and friends who came to the United States in search of a better life. This Independence Day, it might be tempting to think this dream is now elusive as division and discouragement spread across […]",
"description":"" The American dream has been woven into countless narratives throughout my life, shaped by the inspiring stories shared by my family members and friends who came to the United States in search of a better life. This Independence Day<\/a>, it might be tempting to think this dream is now elusive as division<\/a> and discouragement<\/a> spread across our country.<\/p> But my life proves it can still be a reality \u2014 if we strive to make it one. <\/p> Those of us from immigrant communities are familiar with the promise of opportunity, enshrined by the Founding Fathers in the Declaration of Independence and encapsulated in the ideals of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Families like mine have worked urgently to realize this promise.<\/p> Growing up, my family of 12 children born to immigrant parents faced many obstacles. We could have taken the wrong path, but we were fortunate to live in a state that gave us access to a top-tier education at Catholic private schools, magnet schools, and traditional public schools, in which each of us found what we needed to chase our dreams. <\/p> As a young girl, I didn\u2019t believe I was intelligent or that I could excel in school. Even though my parents had faith in me, I was convinced I would fail. I focused on sports, thinking it was the only area in which I could succeed. I thought my siblings would go on to be successful while I remained stuck in poverty.<\/p> But thanks to scholarship opportunities in my state, I met teachers who saw my potential and supported me, helping me gain confidence. And I was able to build friendships with others from different backgrounds and belief systems. <\/p> Today, I am a college graduate working at a national policy organization, fighting for children like me. I went from feeling inadequate as a young girl to testifying before Congress at age 24.\u00a0<\/p> My siblings and I are a fulfillment of my grandparents\u2019 dreams. We all have different opinions, careers, hopes, and dreams, but we are all achieving our goals. Four of us are college graduates, two are engineers, one is in medical school, six are university students, and two are high school students. <\/p> This Independence Day, I want my family\u2019s story to be the norm, not an exception.<\/p> I want my generation to reignite the spirit of striving for greatness in their careers, nurturing their families, or pursuing whatever version of the American dream they might hold. Negativity and doom may drive news cycles, but success stories abound when children are given opportunity. We must share these stories \u2014 and make them possible.<\/p> Consider my friend and colleague Gissell, a first-generation American born in Delaware but raised in Mexico in the early 2000s. At 14 years old, she returned without her parents to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to pursue her education. Thanks to Cristo Rey Jesuit High School, which she was able to attend because of Wisconsin\u2019s school choice program, Gissell overcame numerous obstacles, including the difficult decision to forgo a full scholarship to Georgetown University to bring her two teenage sisters from Mexico instead and care for them. <\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> She went on to earn a double full scholarship to Marquette University and became the first college graduate in her family this May. She is still building her American dream as she pursues a career in policy.<\/p> Our stories prove the American dream is alive and well if only we give children the chance to chase it. This means granting them access to quality education and opportunities regardless of their background or ZIP code. This Independence Day, let\u2019s rededicate ourselves to that goal.<\/p> Hera Varmah is a graduate of Florida\u2019s tax credit scholarship programs and an external relations associate at the American Federation for Children.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/iStock-1399726385.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3069580-1720021085",
"title":"Three times Biden disregarded the ‘limits of presidential power’",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3069580%2Fthree-times-biden-disregarded-the-limits-of-presidential-power%2F",
"byline":"Andrea Ruth",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Fresh off his humiliating performance at the presidential debate, President Joe Biden found the energy to deliver brief remarks to a nationally televised audience over the Supreme Court‘s presidential immunity case. In a four-minute address that resembled a campaign ad more than a formal statement, Biden, who took no questions, condemned the Supreme Court’s decision. […]",
"description":"" Fresh off his humiliating performance at the presidential debate, President Joe Biden<\/a> found the energy to deliver brief remarks to a nationally televised audience over the Supreme Court<\/a>'s presidential immunity case.\u00a0<\/p> In a four-minute address that resembled a campaign ad more than a formal statement, Biden, who took no questions, condemned the Supreme Court's decision. His comments echoed those of Justice Sonia Sotomayor<\/a>, employing fear-inducing language such as \"fundamentally changed\" and other phrases suggesting a significant shift but also allowing for possible retreats, such as \"for all practical purposes,\" \"almost certainly,\" and \"virtually no limits.\"<\/p> One thing Biden said stood out<\/a>. \"I know I will respect the limits of the presidential power, as I have for three and a half years,\" he said. <\/p> This statement is in stark contrast to his actions. In reality, the president has consistently pushed the boundaries of his power, particularly during the first two years of his presidency, when he frequently disregarded the separation of powers. <\/p> Rent moratorium<\/p> The first instance in which Biden ignored the limits of presidential power was when he allowed the COVID-era rent moratorium to remain in place. He won an initial 5-4 decision. Still, Justice Brett Kavanaugh<\/a> warned he only allowed it to continue to maintain an orderly transition and that any further relief would require \"clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation).\" The Biden administration ignored the warning and tried to extend the moratorium again. The Supreme Court struck it down.\u00a0<\/p> Vaccine mandate<\/p> In another instance, the Biden administration attempted to force private companies to mandate employee vaccinations, arguing it had the authority to use Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations to enforce it. The Supreme Court disagreed, striking down the mandate and ruling the agency exceeded its authority. The court wrote, \"Although Congress<\/a> has indisputably given OSHA the power to regulate occupational dangers, it has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly.\"\u00a0<\/p> Student debt relief<\/p> Though academics, scholars, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Biden did not have the authority to implement student debt relief unilaterally, the president chose to do it anyway. Once again, the Supreme Court told him \"no,\" reminding him in yet another instance that he was not respecting the limits of presidential power. Chief Justice John Roberts<\/a> rejected the administration's argument it had authority under the 2003 HEROES Act to implement the plan. Roberts wrote, \"The question here is not whether something should be done; it is who has the authority to do it.\"\u00a0<\/p> The court invoked the \"major question\" doctrine, which states that if Congress wants to give agencies the authority to make decisions of vast economic and political significance, it must say so clearly. Roberts said the HEROES Act didn't authorize debt relief at all. <\/p> Rather than go to Congress and ask lawmakers to draft legislation for debt relief, Biden attempted a backdoor to implement student debt forgiveness. The administration devised a new scheme it felt would insulate it from judicial review. Biden had the audacity to boast about it. He said, \"The Supreme Court blocked me, but it did not stop me.\" <\/p> However, two federal judges in separate states, Kansas and Missouri, blocked the new Saving on a Valuable Education plan enacted by the Department of Education<\/a>. States sued, arguing the administration once again overstepped its authority. While the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily lifted the Kansas judge's ban on the new repayment plan, the injunction is still in place in Missouri. The judges in both cases said the administration could not show Congress authorized the new plan.\u00a0<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> The judges in the two cases, U.S. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree in Kansas and U.S. District Judge John A. Ross in Missouri, were both appointed by President Barack Obama<\/a>. So, any complaints team Biden might have about the judges' political motivations fall flat.<\/p> Pointing out how wrong former President Donald Trump is when it comes to restraints on executive power is not a valid way for Biden to excuse his lack of restraint, and it is a bald-faced lie for him to say he's respected the limits of presidential power during his term.<\/p> Andrea Ruth is a contributor to the Washington Examiner magazine.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/AP24184012822003-scaled.webp?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3065773-1719900000",
"title":"Fairfax County Public Schools leadership displays disdain for parents — again",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3065773%2Ffairfax-county-public-schools-leadership-displays-disdain-for-parents-again%2F",
"byline":"Stephanie Lundquist-Arora",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Last Thursday, as the first presidential debate was making national headlines, Fairfax County School Board members held a meeting during which they voted on controversial changes to family life education curriculum. The takeaway for the few of us able to attend or watch it virtually was that the district’s leadership hates parents — or, at […]",
"description":"" Last Thursday, as the first presidential debate<\/a> was making national headlines, Fairfax County School Board<\/a> members held a meeting during which they voted on controversial changes to family life education curriculum. The takeaway for the few of us able to attend or watch it virtually was that the district\u2019s leadership hates parents \u2014 or, at the very least, is severely inconvenienced by us.<\/p> Darcy Healy, one of the speakers during public comment, delivered an impassioned statement that represents how many parents in Fairfax County are feeling. She said<\/a>, \u201cWe are parents, and we want you to listen to us, but we feel that that\u2019s just not happening. \u2026 The survey that was done in May and June [shows] 80% are against this co-ed situation. Let\u2019s continue to debate this. Don\u2019t do it over the summer. And don\u2019t do the vote on the evening of the presidential debate. This is an important topic. Show us that you want it to be important.\u201d<\/p> Healy is right. In surveys both this year<\/a> and last year<\/a>, parents and community members made it clear that they did not support co-ed sex education or gender ideology instruction in their children\u2019s elementary classrooms. Several community members made this exact point during the last two school board meetings\u2019 public comment periods on June 13 and June 27.<\/p> Instead of being inclusive and accepting community feedback, the Fairfax County School Board was hostile \u2014 most notably among them, the board\u2019s vice chairwoman, Melanie Meren<\/a>.<\/p> First, Meren spoke indignantly about the curriculum\u2019s opt-out option. She said<\/a>, \u201cAnd, you know, what I want to convey is that we need to make decisions of curriculum for the benefit of, you know, as many children as possible. And this is why parents and families have the option to opt out if they don\u2019t feel the content is appropriate for their children when it comes to family life education.\u201d<\/p> But why include unwanted, political nonsense such as gender ideology in a public school district\u2019s sex education curriculum and then place the burden of opting out on the parents? Here\u2019s why: because district leadership knows that many parents are preoccupied with our many other obligations and will forget to complete the extra administrative task of opting out our children from curriculum lessons.<\/p> District leaders should not be experimenting with our children, but since they seem to insist on doing so, this curriculum should require parents to opt in rather than opt out.<\/p> Meren then delivered an angry rant about the illegitimacy of the community\u2019s feedback mechanisms. She said<\/a>, \u201cI also do want to underscore that the comments that have been referred to as a survey, um, it actually was not a survey. There was a call for public comments. \u2026 There was also not a methodology to ensure that comments were unique contributors. So, of the 2,500 comments, it\u2019s unknown how many were contributed more than once.\u201d<\/p> The takeaway is that if the district\u2019s leaders don\u2019t like community feedback, they blame the comment forum. Last year, for example, Karl Frisch<\/a>, the school board chairman, similarly dismissed<\/a> the survey as feedback from \u201cReddit warriors.\u201d<\/p> In contrast, Ilryong Moon, a school board member who does not appear to be completely disgusted and inconvenienced by the district\u2019s parents, seemed to realize the absurdity of his colleagues\u2019 comments right away. The at-large member responded<\/a> that if there was a problem with the feedback mechanism for community input, it was the board\u2019s responsibility to fix the process. Moon further said he valued community input and thanked the 2,539 survey respondents for their time.<\/p> Unfortunately, in spite of the negative feedback on the proposal, school board members, including Moon, voted to include gender ideology instruction in the seventh grade family life education curriculum. And they did not vote against gender ideology indoctrination for elementary school children. They instead postponed that decision \u2014 perhaps in the hopes that they can pass it when fewer parents are paying attention.<\/p> Or even worse, they will include such measures surreptitiously and without a vote. Acting on her \u201cmajority doesn\u2019t always dictate\u201d philosophy, Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent Michelle Reid has already used a back-door, anti-democratic, administrative method to introduce co-ed instruction for sex education in the district\u2019s new pilot program<\/a> in 14 elementary schools that she likely intends to expand.\u00a0<\/p> And so, to Healy I say, I feel your pain, and we will continue to debate this. But sadly, it seems that Reid, Frisch, Meren, and their tyrannical leftist activist minority have already decided what is best for our children. They seem to believe that we, the parents, are roadblocks obstructing their path, to be circumvented or run over.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for the Washington Examiner, a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author, and the Fairfax chapter leader of the Independent Women\u2019s Network.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/iStock-473628448-scaled.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3060911-1719468000",
"title":"How Ben Sasse could transform education",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3060911%2Fhow-ben-sasse-could-transform-education%2F",
"byline":"Max Eden",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"In late 2022, former Republican Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse was appointed president of the University of Florida. The media mostly ran with artificially inflated stories of student protests. But Sasse’s supporters were optimistic that he could prove a transformative leader. To date, he’s kept a relatively low public profile. But Sasse has just been handed […]",
"description":"" In late 2022, former Republican Nebraska<\/a> Sen. Ben Sasse was appointed president of the University of Florida. The media mostly ran with artificially inflated stories of student protests. But Sasse\u2019s supporters were optimistic that he could prove a transformative leader.\u00a0<\/p> To date, he\u2019s kept a relatively low public profile. But Sasse has just been handed a golden opportunity to remodel not only higher education, but substantially improve public K-12 education along with it. We should know soon whether he\u2019ll take it.<\/p> For decades, conservatives have complained about teachers\u2019 colleges, where educators and administrators must receive certification. The evidence proves that they\u2019re a waste of time and money that confers no benefit on new teachers. Worse than that, they\u2019ve devolved into little more than critical race theory-indoctrination camps. It\u2019s rather insane that red states still require teachers to be steeped in anti-white, anti-American, anti-achievement dogma before entering a public school classroom.<\/p> But most do, for three reasons. First, state legislators tend to be intimidated by people who have \u201cPh.D\u2019s,\u201d even if they have Ph.D\u2019s in nonsense. Second, legislators are typically reticent to rock the boat at their alma maters. And third, even if legislators had the will, transformational leaders who could overhaul a teachers\u2019 college are few and far between.<\/p> None of these limiting conditions, however, apply to the UF.<\/p> The Florida legislature passed House Bill 1291 last month, which mandates that state-approved teacher-preparation programs may not be \u201cbased on theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States.\u201d Instead, these programs must teach \u201cmastery of academic program content\u201d and \u201cinstructional strategies.\u201d Fancy that \u2014 schools of education that teach teachers to teach, rather than be social justice warriors. This law goes into effect on July 1.<\/p> As the Claremont Institute recently documented<\/a>, the UF\u2019s College of Education is radically out of compliance with state law. UF\u2019s College of Education went as woke as any teachers\u2019 college could get \u2014 right under DeSantis\u2019s nose. In 2020, it jettisoned requirements for things such as \u201cCore Teaching Strategies,\u201d \u201cMusic for the Elementary Child,\u201d and \u201cArt Education\u201d with, respectively, \u201cEquity Pedagogy Foundations,\u201d \u201cEquity Pedagogy Applications\u201d and \u201cStudying Equity Pedagogy.\u201d Math and science? They simply weren\u2019t \u201cinclusive\u201d enough.<\/p> Which is to say \u2014 everything was infused with CRT. Required course readings include things such as \u201cThe First Day of School: A CRT Story,\u201d \u201cWhite Girl Teaching,\u201d \u201cRaising Race Questions: Whiteness and Inquiry in Education,\u201d and required videos included one called \u201cThe Urgency of Intersectionality.\u201d<\/p> So, what will Sasse do? A traditional college president would try to run interference for his institution, make cosmetic changes, and do his best to continue to violate the spirit of the law while pretending to adhere to its letter. Sasse doesn\u2019t need to play it this way, though. He can, and should, see that between the Florida law and the Claremont report he has been dealt two aces.<\/p> By going hard-woke right under DeSantis\u2019s nose, the leadership of UF\u2019s College of Education has clearly indicated that they don\u2019t see themselves as Florida state government employees. So, they shouldn\u2019t be. They should all be fired. The College of Education should be fundamentally reworked, root to branch.<\/p> The possibilities here are incredible. At minimum, Sasse could require his teachers\u2019 college to actually help teachers teach. Best practices in classroom management and student discipline, rigorous instruction in the science of reading, and additional content area knowledge for science, math, or history teachers should be a top priority.<\/p> But UF could go far beyond teaching the basics. Florida has a burgeoning private and micro-school sector thanks to its universal education savings account. UF could offer a teacher entrepreneurship track. Florida\u2019s classical education sector, in particular, is thriving. UF could offer teachers rigorous training in classical methods. And believe it or not, teachers are rarely trained to actually deliver a particular curriculum. UF could do that, too.<\/p> Why must a teacher move to Gainesville to get a UF degree? UF could set up satellite centers in every Florida county, and rework their program to support teacher apprenticeships. What\u2019s more \u2014 why limit that to Florida? With teacher certification reciprocity agreements, UF could colonize (we can use that word; it\u2019s Florida) teacher education nationally.<\/p> When Mitch Daniels was president of Purdue University, he proved that colleges could be effectively administered \u2014 that endless tuition increases resulted from executive incompetence, not an inexorable law of finance. Sasse\u2019s legacy could be to prove that someone other than Daniels can do this too. Or, it could be to pioneer ways in which state flagship universities can drive dramatic improvement in public education \u2014 ways that could and should be emulated in every red state in America if they work.\u00a0<\/p> Here\u2019s hoping he gets started next month on his transformational legacy.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM RESTORING AMERICA<\/a><\/p> Max Eden is a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/AP23008729452093-scaled.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3057090-1719295200",
"title":"Biden’s Gaza pier is an abject failure",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2F3057090%2Fbiden-gaza-pier-abject-failure%2F",
"byline":"John Hannah",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Choose your label to describe what’s become of President Joe Biden’s Gaza pier: Dumpster fire. Boondoggle. White elephant. Whatever you call it, the project is a bona fide failure. It seems destined to be a textbook example of what happens when the political imperative to “do something” overwhelms serious planning. The latest news is that […]",
"description":"" Choose your label to describe what\u2019s become of President Joe Biden\u2019s<\/a> Gaza pier<\/a>: Dumpster fire. Boondoggle. White elephant. Whatever you call it, the project is a bona fide failure. It seems destined to be a textbook example of what happens when the political imperative to \u201cdo something\u201d overwhelms serious planning.\u00a0<\/p> The latest news<\/a> is that the pier may be terminated ahead of schedule. Erected in mid-May by the U.S. military to deliver seaborne assistance, the pier\u2019s operations repeatedly have been interrupted by rough waters.\u00a0<\/p> A storm broke<\/a> the pier apart only days after going into service. After millions of dollars of repairs<\/a>, it was thrown back into action. Days later, forecasts of choppy waters led the military to tow<\/a> the pier to safe harbor. It\u2019s just returned<\/a> to service a third time, though it\u2019s hard not to believe that the project\u2019s days are numbered.\u00a0<\/p> Mother Nature may end up being the proximate cause of the pier\u2019s demise, but it hasn\u2019t been the only problem foiling the effort. Security has also been a major problem. In the brief time the facility actually functioned, the relatively small amounts of assistance making it to shore were being widely looted by desperate mobs.\u00a0<\/p> All of these challenges were forecast well in advance. This was hardly a case in which officials struggled to make sense of what former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld famously described<\/a> as the \u201cknown unknowns\u201d and the \u201cunknown unknowns.\u201d On the contrary, the obstacles posed by Gaza\u2019s heavy seas and lack of security were obvious to anyone tracking events.\u00a0<\/p> In other words, Biden and his team were operating in the easiest part of Rumsfeld\u2019s matrix: the land of \u201cknown knowns\u201d \u2014 problems that we know with certainty will arise and that require solutions in advance.<\/p> I was part of a group that had discussions last December with the U.S. team in charge of getting humanitarian aid into Gaza. We asked about the feasibility of a maritime channel. In so many words, we were told it was a dumb idea. Waters near Gaza are notoriously treacherous. The effort would be within range of Hamas\u2019s guns. The amount of aid that could be delivered by sea would be a drop in the bucket of what was needed. Far better to focus on dramatically expanding land routes into Gaza, we were told.\u00a0<\/p> That wasn\u2019t the only expert advice the administration disregarded. Reporting suggests<\/a> the U.S. military first learned of Biden\u2019s decision to build the pier only when he announced it in his March 7 State of the Union address. But at the time, planners still had no answers as to how such a project could be successfully executed.<\/p> Topping their concerns was security and making sure that once supplies made it to shore, they could be safely delivered into the hands of suffering Gazans. It was already widely understood that the biggest challenge was not getting adequate supplies of food into Gaza but making sure it reached innocent civilians without first being diverted.<\/p> Remarkably, Biden and his team didn\u2019t demand a solution to the security problem before making the pier the centerpiece of a major presidential initiative. Nor did they bother to develop one in the two months that it took the military to get the pier into place. With the eyes of the world watching and U.S. credibility on the line, the administration\u2019s approach to a well-defined set of challenges that could make or break the effort seemed to amount to little more than hoping things would work out.<\/p> Alas, they haven\u2019t. Instead, the pier has become a humiliating internet meme<\/a> and joke \u2014 and at a price tag of more than $200 million in U.S. taxpayer funds and months of effort by 1,000 troops.\u00a0<\/p> On its face, this appears to be a classic case of a breakdown in sound policymaking. At the time of Biden\u2019s announcement, criticism of his support for Israel was reaching fever pitch. Pictures of Gaza\u2019s devastation dominated headlines. Important parts<\/a> of Biden\u2019s Democratic coalition were threatening not to support his reelection.\u00a0<\/p> It\u2019s not hard to imagine that within the White House pressure cooker, the panic to \u201cdo something\u201d for suffering Palestinians and show presidential leadership by going over the heads of a seemingly recalcitrant Israeli leadership became overwhelming. Something big had to be announced in the State of the Union \u2014 regardless of whether all the hard questions had been answered.<\/p> Understandable? Perhaps. Acceptable? No. Good intentions are not enough. Hope is never a strategy, especially not for the world\u2019s greatest democracy whose resolve, reliability, and competence have never been in greater doubt. We simply can\u2019t afford self-inflicted mistakes such as Biden\u2019s pier \u2014 mistakes that observers saw coming miles away. <\/p> Figuring out how things went so badly awry should be a target-rich environment for congressional oversight. <\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM RESTORING AMERICA<\/a><\/p> John Hannah is a senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America and former national security adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/AP24139591326544.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3052740-1718960078",
"title":"Rubio’s rapport with Latino voters could drive Trump to victory",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fpresidential%2F3052740%2Fmarco-rubio-latino-voters-trump-victory%2F",
"byline":"Ross O'Keefe",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Former President Donald Trump‘s interest in selecting Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) as his vice president is setting off alarm bells for Democrats. The Florida senator and one-time rival of Trump has turned into a reliable ally and offers the former president a direct line to a bloc Republicans have been flirting with taking from Democrats […]",
"description":"" Former President Donald Trump<\/a>'s interest in selecting Sen. Marco Rubio<\/a> (R-FL) as his vice president is setting off alarm bells for Democrats.<\/p> The Florida senator and one-time rival of Trump has turned into a reliable ally and offers the former president a direct line to a bloc Republicans have been flirting with taking from Democrats for years \u2014 Latino and Hispanic voters. While Latino and Hispanic voters aren't a monolith, creating in-roads with them would put several states Democrats have taken for granted in recent cycles in play, Michael LaRosa, who is a former press secretary for first lady Jill Biden and special assistant to President Joe Biden, wrote<\/a> in an op-ed for the New York Times.<\/p> \"But there is something Latino voters have in common: their Latin American roots and the pride that comes from casting a vote for someone who looks and talks like them,\" LaRosa wrote. \"Mr. Rubio would break a significant cultural barrier as the first Latino on a national ticket.\"<\/p> Rubio could help Trump convince large Latino constituencies in swing states Arizona and Nevada while shoring up Republican-leaning Florida. It also could make normally Democratic New Mexico, which has the largest proportion of Hispanics in the United States, interesting.<\/p> There has been some doubt about whether Rubio could serve as Trump's vice president, given the 12th Amendment doesn't allow for a president and vice president to be from the same state, in this case, Florida, without losing its electoral votes.<\/p> LaRosa said this concern is \"overblown,\" citing former Vice President Dick Cheney's residential switch from Texas to Wyoming, and he thinks Rubio could do something similar.<\/p> LaRosa said Trump selecting Rubio would be taking a page out of Biden's 2020 campaign playbook. When he selected Vice President Kamala Harris, he made the choice to appeal to voters of color, a move that worked as black women turned out for the Biden-Harris ticket.<\/p> And winning over Hispanic and Latino voters will matter in states where they make up smaller shares of the electorate but where the races are still considered tight. Trump is beating Biden in Pennsylvania by more than 2 points in the Real Clear Politics average<\/a> \u2014\u00a0a state Biden can't afford to lose if he plans to repeat his 2020 success.<\/p> LaRosa argued, \"There are voters who make their choice because they want to be a part of history and break ground more than, say, that they agree with the candidate, or the ticket, on specific policies.\" Latinos could be those voters, and that's why he said Rubio scares him and should scare Democrats this November.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> The Florida senator is one man in a throng<\/a> of Trump vice presidential candidates, some of whom recently received vetting materials from the campaign.<\/p> The Washington Examiner contacted the Trump campaign and Rubio's office but received no response.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/AP22310815339264-scaled.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3047141-1718618746",
"title":"Torres mocks Bowman’s fire alarm stunt in hint he’s abandoning fellow Democrat",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fcongressional%2F3047141%2Ftorres-mocks-bowman-fire-alarm-hint-abandoning-democrat%2F",
"byline":"Elaine Mallon",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) is in the middle of a brutal primary fight, and a fellow New York Democrat looks like he is on the cusp of endorsing the “Squad” member’s opponent. Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), a fiercely pro-Israel member of Congress, got into a spat with Bowman over the weekend after the Israel critic […]",
"description":"" Rep. Jamaal Bowman<\/a> (D-NY) is in the middle of a brutal primary fight, and a fellow New York<\/a> Democrat looks like he is on the cusp of endorsing the \u201cSquad\u201d member\u2019s opponent.<\/p> Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), a fiercely pro-Israel<\/a> member of Congress, got into a spat with Bowman over the weekend after the Israel critic questioned the sincerity of Torres\u2019s support for the Jewish state. Torres was quick to hit back at Bowman, poking fun at the lawmaker\u2019s stunt of pulling a fire alarm in the Capitol while on his way to a vote that would prevent a government shutdown last September.<\/p> \u201cAs for Jamaal Bowman, I care as much about his opinion on me as I do about his opinion on how to properly pull a fire alarm or his opinion on how to remain in Congress,\u201d Torres told<\/a> the New York Post. \u201cHis opinion is worse than a rubber stamp \u2014 it leaves no impression, much like his legislative record or his recent attendance record.\u201d<\/p> Bowman said on the Night School podcast<\/a> hosted by Marc Lamont Hill that Torres only stands in support of Israel because of the \u201cpower of the Israel lobby.\u201d<\/p> \u201cRitchie is very calculating in this way. ... Ritchie \u2014 he just seems to be always plotting, always calculating something,\u201d Bowman said.<\/p> Bowman\u2019s attack on Torres, a two-term representative of the Bronx, appeared unprovoked as the neighboring representative had steered clear of weighing in on Bowman\u2019s contest.<\/p> But in the middle of the episode, Hill asked Bowman to comment on why Torres falls in line with Bowman on every matter except for when it comes to Israel.<\/p> \u201cHow can someone be so progressive on so many issues and not see the injustice going on in Palestine in the same way?\u201d Hill asked.<\/p> Hill made the comment that Torres \u201ctweets to Netanyahu like he is Netanyahu\u2019s long lost cousin.\u201d<\/p> \u201cSo if I was doing that when I first got in, my bank account first of all would be flushed,\u201d Bowman said.<\/p> Bowman\u2019s criticisms of Israel as it wages war with Hamas have put him in a vulnerable position with the large contingent of Jewish supporters in his district.<\/p> The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, an influential pro-Israel PAC, has spent millions of dollars attacking Bowman, helping give Westchester County Executive George Latimer a boost in his challenge to unseat the two-term congressman. Bowman is trailing Latimer by 17 points, according<\/a> to a recent poll.<\/p> Prior to serving as U.S. representative for the Bronx, Torres was a New York City Council member for 10 years. He noted his public support for Israel dates back to 2015, when he took a trip there. <\/p> He said one of the reasons he didn\u2019t join the \u201cSquad\u201d after being elected in 2020 was he believed that some of the members\u2019 support for the BDS movement was antisemitic.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> \u201cI have a general rule of not weighing in against a congressional Democrat who has not weighed in against me,\u201d Torres said. \u201cBut Bowman\u2019s gratuitous attack on my character might cause me to rethink that rule.\u201d<\/p> New York\u2019s primary will be on June 25.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/AP24165005433095.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3004139-1715721649",
"title":"Biden greenlights $1 billion weapon shipment to Israel week after withholding bombs",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fwhite-house%2F3004139%2Fbiden-greenlights-weapon-shipment-israel-after-withholding-bombs%2F",
"byline":"Brady Knox",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"The Biden administration announced its approval of a $1 billion weapon shipment to Israel just one week after President Joe Biden announced he would withhold a weapons shipment if Israel launched an offensive into Rafah. The administration notified Congress of the move on Tuesday, the Washington Examiner independently confirmed. Officials told the Wall Street Journal […]",
"description":"" The Biden administration<\/a> announced its approval of a $1 billion weapon shipment to Israel<\/a> just one week after President Joe Biden announced he would withhold a weapons shipment if Israel launched an offensive into Rafah.<\/p> The administration notified Congress of the move on Tuesday, the Washington Examiner independently confirmed. <\/p> Officials told<\/a> the Wall Street Journal that the package includes offensive weapons, including $700 million in tank ammunition, $500 million in tactical vehicles, and $60 million in mortar rounds. Additional steps must be taken before the weapons are approved and delivered.<\/p> The move was foreshadowed by national security adviser John Kirby, speaking with reporters last week.<\/p> \"[Biden] also said yesterday that he will continue to ensure that Israel has all of the military means it needs to defend itself against all of its enemies, including Hamas,\" he said. \"For him, this is very straightforward: He\u2019s going to continue to provide Israel with all of the capabilities it needs, but he does not want certain categories of American weapons used in a particular type of operation in a particular place. And again, he has been clear and consistent with that.\"<\/p> Kirby further clarified that Israel has not yet launched a Rafah operation that crosses Biden's red line. Biden said last week he would withhold specific 2,000-pound bombs from Israel if the country expanded operations into Rafah, where Palestinian refugees have fled due to the war.<\/p> Israel began an offensive into Rafah last week, which has continued with airstrikes and ground operations. It's unclear what Biden's red line regarding Rafah is.<\/p> House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) signaled that the lower chamber was satisfied with Biden's action.<\/p> \u201cI think it\u2019s important for us to express again the will of Congress on the matter and so I don\u2019t think we\u2019ll be changing what we do on the legislation,\u201d he told reporters Tuesday evening.<\/p> Tuesday's move to approve another major weapons shipment is likely to lose Biden the goodwill he received from progressive Democratic allies after his announcement that offensive weapons would be withheld, which in turn drew him ire from Republicans and pro-Israel Democrats.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> Biden has attempted to balance the passions of pro-Israel Democrats with the vehement opposition of pro-Palestinian Democrats during Israel's campaign in Gaza. The invasion of Rafah has emerged as a new flashpoint, with the Biden administration repeatedly warning Israel of the consequences if it launches an all-out assault on the area.<\/p> Cami Mondeaux and Naomi Lim contributed to this report.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/AP24128020312504-1-scaled.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"2872560-1709100613",
"title":"Great Stakes: Michigan union and blue-collar workers in the driver’s seat for the presidency",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2F2872560%2Fmichigan-union-blue-collar-workers-drivers-seat-presidency%2F",
"byline":"Naomi Lim",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Michigan voters have an outsize impact on who will win the White House and which party will carry the House and Senate in 2024. In this series, Great Stakes: The fight to be hailed as victors in Michigan, the Washington Examiner will look at the thorny politics and unique matters that will swing the critical battleground state. Part four, […]",
"description":"" Michigan voters have an outsize impact on who will win the White House and which party will carry the House and Senate in 2024. In this series, Great Stakes: The fight to be hailed as victors in Michigan, the Washington Examiner will look at the thorny politics and unique matters that will swing the critical battleground state. Part four, below, examines how the economy and union vote will determine who wins the expected rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.<\/p> SHELBY TOWNSHIP, Michigan \u2014 President Joe Biden<\/a> and former President Donald Trump<\/a>'s economic<\/a> pitches to Michigan<\/a>'s blue-collar voters, particularly the state's half a million union<\/a> members, could decide the 2024 general election<\/a> as this week's primary underscores the likely nominees' respective weaknesses before November.<\/p> If Trump can compete with Biden for those voters in places such as Michigan's famed Macomb County<\/a>, as former President Ronald Reagan<\/a> did in 1980 with so-called Reagan Democrats, he could win the state's 15 Electoral College<\/a> votes and reclaim the White House<\/a> this election cycle.<\/p> Trump not only has to win Macomb County, as he did in 2016 and 2020, but he also has to \"win with a margin\" to counter the parts of Michigan where he could underperform, according to Republican strategist Jamie Roe, the longtime chief of staff to former Republican Rep. Candice Miller.<\/p> Tuesday's Republican primary emphasized Trump's loose grip on 30 to 40% of his party, with former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations<\/a> Nikki Haley<\/a> holding him to 70% of the vote. Meanwhile, Biden netted about 80% of the Democratic primary vote due to an \"uncommitted<\/a>\" protest vote.<\/p> Macomb County voted for Gov. Gretchen Whitmer<\/a> (D-MI) in 2022, \"but every time Trump's been on the ballot, there are parts of the electorate that come out\" for him \"that really don't come out for a whole lot of other people,\" Roe told the Washington Examiner.<\/p> Those people include union workers despite Michigan-based United Auto Workers <\/a>President Shawn Fain, for example, endorsing Biden last month.<\/p> Terry Bowman, Trump's 2016 campaign Michigan co-chairman and 2020 Workers for Trump national chairman, has also worked for the Ford Motor Company<\/a> for almost three decades. Bowman now chairs the board of the nonpolitical Institute for the American Worker, but he contended what is good for union officials does not \"necessarily mean that it's good for the rank and file.\"<\/p> \"They like [Trump] personally as a candidate and just as a person,\" Bowman said. \"Secondly, we do now have a history of Donald Trump's policies, and going into 2024, I think workers have looked at: What did Donald Trump do for blue-collar auto workers<\/a>, and what has Joe Biden done for blue-collar workers?\"<\/p> One of Biden's more politically problematic policies has been his desire to have 50% of all new vehicle sales being electric models<\/a> by 2030, though policy analysts disagree regarding its workforce consequences. Simultaneously, Bowman was temporarily laid off this week because Ford's Rawsonville Plant in Ypsilanti, Michigan, which builds batteries for the maker's electric F-150 Lightning, is reducing production and shifts.<\/p> \"We have thousands, or tens of thousands of workers in the auto industry in America that work in transmission plants and in engine plants,\" Bowman said. \"There's more jobs coming into the assembly of batteries, but it's not going to be on a one-for-one basis. ... Even with the government subsidies, the demand for these trucks is just not there.\"<\/p> Trump receiving more support from industrial union workers than Republicans traditionally do is \"part of a longer transformation along educational lines between the political parties,\" according to Michigan State University Institute of Public Policy and Social Research Director Matthew Grossmann. But that does not help Biden, who this week had almost 52,000 Democrats mark themselves as \"uncommitted\" in protest of the Israel<\/a>-Hamas<\/a> war instead of voting for him.<\/p> \"It's a smaller proportion of the Michigan economy than it used to be, but it still has a lot of cultural resonance because lots of people have family members who work for the auto industry or support the UAW,\" Grossmann said.<\/p> Mark Gaffney, a former president of Michigan's AFL-CIO<\/a>, a union federation, conceded other types of labor groups have become less politically powerful as their membership has declined, in addition to those members being \"more independent.\"<\/p> \"Younger members tend to be even more independent,\" Gaffney said, adding that Trump's opposition to the North American Free Trade Agreement appealed to industrial union members after years of their leadership describing such deals as bad.<\/p> \"So along comes Trump, and whether he follows through on everything that he says or not is debatable, but he convinces people that he's talking their language,\" Gaffney continued. \"So we could have lost, in some unions, as many as 40% of our members last time. And that's a pretty big number.\"<\/p> But Jackie Kelly-Smith, Macomb County Democratic Committee's black caucus chairwoman and a retired UAW worker, was more optimistic concerning Biden's prospects in the community, citing him taking part in last fall's strike.<\/p> \"We've had this going on since I got hired by General Motors<\/a> in 1975,\" Kelly-Smith said. \"They feel as though my union should not endorse someone that I don't want to vote for. On the other hand, you have the union saying we're going to endorse those that allow us to continue to represent, negotiate, and bargain, and that's not always a Republican president. ... Trump didn't care if we went bankrupt.\"<\/p> More broadly, the economy, along with border<\/a> security and abortion<\/a> access, could determine the election, with polls demonstrating disapproval of Biden's economic approach. For instance, Biden's economic approval rating is roughly net negative 16 percentage points, with 40% approving and 56% disapproving.<\/p> Michigan state Rep. Karen Twinsett, a Democrat who represents parts of Detroit and Dearborn in neighboring Wayne County, another critical region, recognized that Biden's economy, or \"Bidenomics,\"<\/a> has been detrimental to her constituents.<\/p> \"When you're talking about somebody in the presidency, normally, these things don't bother you until they're hitting you at home, like gas prices<\/a> or whatever,\" Twinsett said. \"Everyday people don't think about that stuff, but when you go to the grocery store, you're feeling it.\"<\/p> In response, state Rep. Erin Byrnes (D-MI), who represents other parts of Dearborn, implored Biden to emphasize \"corporate greed that has been masquerading as inflation.\"<\/p> \"Inflation<\/a> is real, but also corporations have upped their prices exponentially since the pandemic hit,\" Byrnes said. \"If they don't call it out and don't act on it, people will feel like they're trying to pull the wool over their eyes.\"<\/p> But Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), the dean of Michigan's congressional delegation in Washington, and former state Sen. Tom Barrett, who is contesting Michigan's 7th Congressional District again, argued Bidenomics's damage has already been done. For Walberg, from the five town halls he led last week before his interview with the Washington Examiner, it is \"very clear\" that Bidenomics is \"not working,\" especially related to interest rates <\/a>and energy costs<\/a>, and that only a \"very significant turnaround\" could improve Biden's popularity.<\/p> CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/p> Barrett additionally downplayed the importance of Biden's union endorsements after the International Brotherhood of Teamsters<\/a>'s political action committee donated $45,000 to the Republican National Committee's convention fund. The Teamsters have yet to endorse a candidate.<\/p> \"The national union leadership is always going to endorse Democrats, and the UAW was always going to endorse Biden,\" Barrett said. \"It was just a question of when now they had become frustrated with him over his electric vehicle mandates and other things that really disadvantaged union workers and auto plants because their jobs aren't going to be around. I would say your average or stereotypical UAW worker is probably somebody who cares about crime in their communities, cares about the border a whole heck of a lot.\"<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/AP24023837150822-1-scaled.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3813307-1758192090",
"title":"Buttigieg was Harris’s first choice for 2024 running mate — if she was not a ‘black woman married to a Jewish man’",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2F3813307%2Fbuttigieg-harris-first-choice-2024-running-mate%2F",
"byline":"David Zimmermann",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Former Vice President Kamala Harris revealed in an excerpt of her upcoming book that she would have chosen former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg as her 2024 running mate if she were not a “black woman married to a Jewish man.” Harris’s comments suggest Democratic voters wouldn’t want to support a presidential ticket featuring a black […]",
"description":"" Former Vice President Kamala Harris<\/a> revealed in an excerpt of her upcoming book that she would have chosen former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg<\/a> as her 2024 running mate if she were not a \"black woman married to a Jewish man.\"<\/p> Harris's comments suggest Democratic voters wouldn't want to support a presidential ticket featuring a black woman and a gay man.<\/p> Buttigieg \"would have been an ideal partner\u2014if I were a straight white man,\" she wrote. \"But we were already asking a lot of America: to accept a woman, a Black woman, a Black woman married to a Jewish man. Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let\u2019s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk.\"<\/p> \"And I think Pete also knew that\u2014to our mutual sadness,\" she added.<\/p> Harris's political memoir, 107 Days, set for release on Sept. 23, is said to shed light on behind-the-scenes moments during her short-lived presidential campaign. The latest excerpt was published by the Atlantic<\/a> on Wednesday night.<\/p> Harris took up the Democratic Party's nomination last year after then-President Joe Biden<\/a> unexpectedly dropped out of the race, leaving little time for his successor to appeal to voters. In a previous excerpt<\/a>, also released by the Atlantic, she revealed how Biden's White House team had little confidence in her public skills, making her 2024 run all the more challenging.<\/p> \"They had a huge comms team; they had Karine Jean-Pierre briefing in the pressroom every day,\" she wrote. \"But getting anything positive said about my work or any defense against untrue attacks was almost impossible.\"<\/p> Buttigieg was floated as a possible running mate, citing his young age as a reason. Concerned about Biden's deteriorating mental health at the time, the Democratic Party wanted to go with younger candidates who could fit its message about generational change. Harris is 60, and Buttigieg is 43.<\/p> In her book, the former Democratic nominee said she was aware that she was about to \"cause the same sudden swerve in someone else\u2019s life\" after reflecting on the time she was selected as Biden's running mate in 2020. The passage suggests she didn't want to do that to Buttigieg, with whom she and her Jewish husband Doug Emhoff were close.<\/p> \"I love Pete,\" she wrote. \"I love working with Pete. He and his husband, Chasten, are friends.\"<\/p> Harris instead settled for Gov. Tim Walz<\/a> (D-MN), 61, as her running mate. The two ultimately lost to President Donald Trump<\/a> and Vice President JD Vance<\/a>.<\/p> Walz is now seeking reelection<\/a> for a third term as Minnesota governor next year, while Buttigieg is weighing<\/a> a possible 2028 presidential campaign. Harris may also seek the top spot in the White House again after\u00a0announcing\u00a0in July that she would not run for California governor in 2026.<\/p> HARRIS DEPICTS TENSE RELATIONSHIP WITH BIDEN TEAM IN NEW BOOK: 'HIS TEAM DIDN'T GET IT'<\/a><\/p> While she hasn't confirmed a 2028 bid, her new book may be seen as a stepping stone toward a possible campaign.<\/p> Harris is scheduled to visit 15 cities for her book tour, starting in New York City the day after the book\u2019s release next week. Most of Harris's tour stops are in the United States, but there will also be one stop each in England and Canada this fall.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AP25261098804304.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3813395-1758191623",
"title":"Former Biden chief of staff arrives for House Oversight autopen investigation",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2F3813395%2Fformer-biden-chief-of-staff-arrives-for-house-oversight-autopen-investigation%2F",
"byline":"Kaelan Deese",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"Former White House chief of staff Jeff Zients arrived on Capitol Hill Thursday for a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee as part of the panel’s investigation into whether Biden administration aides concealed the president’s mental decline or executed official acts on his behalf without consent. Zients did not respond to shouted questions from reporters upon entering the […]",
"description":"" Former White House chief of staff\u00a0Jeff Zients<\/a>\u00a0arrived on Capitol Hill Thursday for a closed-door interview with the\u00a0House Oversight Committee<\/a>\u00a0as part of the panel\u2019s investigation into whether Biden administration aides concealed the president\u2019s mental decline or executed official acts on his behalf without consent.<\/p> Zients did not respond to shouted questions from reporters upon entering the committee\u2019s secure interview room.\u00a0Chairman\u00a0James Comer<\/a>\u00a0(R-KY) said, \"We believe Zients is the guy that was potentially making a lot of decisions down the stretch and had a lot of responsibility with respect to the unauthorized use of the autopen.\"<\/p> The interview follows months of scrutiny by Comer, who, in a June 27 letter to Zients, accused senior White House officials of possibly \u201cusurping authority\u201d from then-President\u00a0Joe Biden<\/a>\u00a0and hiding signs of his \u201crapidly worsening mental and physical faculties.\u201d<\/p> \u201cThe Committee seeks to understand who made key decisions and exercised the powers of the executive branch during the previous administration, possibly without former President Biden\u2019s consent,\u201d Comer wrote in the letter. \u201cThe Committee requests your testimony to evaluate your eye-witness account of former President Biden\u2019s decline.\u201d<\/p> Zients is the last of 14 total former Biden aides and staffers interviewed in the sweeping inquiry. Comer said Sunday he believed Zients to be the most important interview of the investigation to date, saying \"a lot of things point to him as being one of the chief instigators of many of the pardons, including the pardon of Dr. Fauci. So we want to know what the process was.\"<\/p> Zients served as Biden\u2019s chief of staff from early 2023 through the end of his term, a period that included his widely criticized presidential debate performance against then-candidate President Donald Trump. In the days after that event, Axios reported that Zients convened a full-staff call to urge aides to rally behind the president and move past what he called \u201cone night.\u201d<\/p> \u201cWe all know he is a great president,\u201d Zients reportedly told staff on the July 3 call.<\/p> The committee cited that call in its letter, arguing Zients\u2019s involvement could be evidence of a coordinated strategy to downplay or obscure Biden\u2019s condition inside the White House. Axios also reported that many staff officials were frustrated by vague talking points from leadership and had little explanation of what occurred during the debate.<\/p> \u201cThe scope of your responsibilities \u2014 both official and otherwise \u2014 and personal interactions within the Oval Office cannot go without investigation,\u201d Comer wrote. \u201cIf White House staff carried out a strategy lasting months or even years to hide the chief executive\u2019s condition \u2014 or to perform his duties \u2014Congress may need to consider a legislative response.\u201d<\/p> Zients appeared voluntarily after committee staff requested confirmation or an alternative date in lieu of a subpoena. His interview had initially been scheduled for Sept. 3 but was postponed following a request from the White House.<\/p> As part of the sweeping investigation, the Oversight panel is also investigating the Biden White House\u2019s use of the autopen, a mechanical signing device used by past administrations but now under renewed scrutiny by Republicans who question whether Biden\u2019s signature was applied to bills or legal orders without his awareness.<\/p> While using the autopen is technically legal, according to a 2005 DOJ memorandum<\/a>, Republicans are probing whether there is any evidence to show the president assented to his signature being placed on certain documents or fully understood how the autopen was being used in his name. <\/p> Biden has pushed back against any suggestion that his staff executed core presidential duties on his behalf, saying he was aware of how the autopen was being used.<\/p> President Donald Trump has called Biden's use of the autopen to sign various executive orders and grant clemency to thousands of inmates \"one of the biggest\" political scandals in contemporary times.<\/p> WHITE HOUSE ACCUSES BIDEN STAFFER OF IMPERSONATING CHIEF OF STAFF IN AUTOPEN INVESTIGATION<\/a><\/p> The committee has already interviewed other senior Biden officials, including former Chief of Staff\u00a0Ron Klain<\/a>\u00a0and,\u00a0most recently<\/a>, former White House press secretary\u00a0Karine Jean-Pierre<\/a>.<\/p> Comer has said the panel will issue a final report with potential legislative recommendations related to presidential succession, transparency, and use of the 25th Amendment.<\/p>"",
"image":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AP24165730058437.jpg?w=696"
},
{"Articles":[
{"id":"3813329-1758190540",
"title":"Extending Obamacare subsidies means 3.6M more insured at $350B cost, CBO says",
"sharelink":"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fpolicy%2Fhealthcare%2F3813329%2Fextending-obamacare-subsidies-3-6-million-insured-350-billion-cost-cbo%2F",
"byline":"Gabrielle M. Etzel",
"publishDate":"Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:21:00 -0500",
"synopsis":"At least 3.5 million more Americans would to lose health insurance coverage if Congress does not extend added Obamacare premium subsidy tax credits, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office. The CBO said Thursday in a new analysis requested by congressional Democrats that permanently extending the extra subsidies would raise the number […]",
"description":"" At least 3.5 million more Americans would to lose health insurance <\/a>coverage if Congress<\/a> does not extend added Obamacare premium<\/a> subsidy tax credits, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.\u00a0\u00a0The CBO said Thursday in a new analysis requested by congressional Democrats that permanently extending the extra subsidies would raise the number of people with health insurance by 3.6 million by 2030 and 3.8 million by 2035. Premiums for Obamacare marketplace plans would also be lower by 7.6% on average over the next decade. <\/p> Renewing the expanded subsidies, though, would cost the Treasury $350 billion over the decade. The price tag illustrates the difficulty Republican leaders face in getting fiscal conservatives to support any extension of subsidies, as favored by some more centrist members of the party. <\/p> The tax credits were enacted by former President Joe Biden and Congressional Democrats in 2021 and extended in 2022 as part of relief efforts during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. They were set to expire at the end of 2025. <\/p> About 24 million Americans get their health insurance through Obamacare marketplace exchanges, with more than 22 million of those patients qualifying for enhanced premium subsidies. <\/p> Roughly half of all adults under age 65 with Obamacare marketplace coverage are employed by a small business or are self-employed, according to the healthcare policy organization KFF.<\/p> Patients are likely to take an even tougher blow as insurers increase their premium rates next year. A report from the health policy organization KFF, which supports expanding the subsidies, found that Obamacare insurers are planning an average premium increase of around 18% <\/a>for 2026. <\/p> Combined with the expiring subsidies, that means people could be paying an average of 75% more in premiums next year. <\/p> Democrats have made securing healthcare concessions, including extending the premium subsidies, a pillar of their resistance to the Republican-led continuing resolution to fund the federal government for the rest of the year.\u00a0<\/p> The deadline to reach a deal on the continuing resolution is Sept. 30, just one month before health insurance open enrollment begins on the Obamacare exchanges and the employer-sponsored insurance market. <\/p> House Minority Leader