To stop the cartels, Trump must impose a territorial price on Mexico City

Published



National borders are a privilege of sovereign governance, not a shield for state-sanctioned criminal anarchy. Recent independent analysis reveals that organized crime exercises effective control over roughly 30% of Mexican territory and disputes control over another 47%. This structural collapse leaves Mexico City with clear state predominance in a mere 23% of the country. Crucially, northern corridors through Baja California, Sonora, and Chihuahua now function as the primary arteries for human trafficking, illicit migrant smuggling, cartel logistics, and the massive flow of fentanyl into our nation.

History shows that tactical, asymmetric leverage can reverse such profound lawlessness. In October 1853, American filibuster William Walker demonstrated how a tiny force could exert massive territorial pressure. Landing with just 45 men near Cabo San Lucas, Walker seized La Paz, proclaimed a short-lived Republic of Lower California, and launched audacious claims against Sonora. Facing overwhelming fiscal exhaustion and fearing the total erosion of its national sovereignty, Mexico’s government under Santa Anna accelerated the critical diplomatic negotiations that ultimately yielded the famous “Gadsden Purchase.” This dramatic episode proves that credible, localized pressure shifts foreign calculations far more effectively than diplomatic insistence alone.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.