CNN’s Chris Cuomo deserves no credit for the so-called apology he wrote in 2005 to a woman he allegedly groped at a party.
There is nothing, as the American Conservative’s Rod Dreher claimed Friday, “gallant” about the CNN host’s email to his former boss and former ABC and CBS News executive producer Shelley Ross.
“Chris Cuomo did a stupid, offensive thing in 2005,” Dreher said. “He grabbed his former producer’s butt. When she told him this was unwelcome, he wrote her a gallant apology. Now, all these years later, she’s in the [New York Times] trashing him. I’m no Cuomo fan, but this is unfair.”
It’s true about Ross and the New York Times, the part where she spills the alleged details of the sexual harassment incident.
Her opinion article reads as follows:
“I can do this now that you’re no longer my boss,” he said to me with a kind of cocky arrogance. “No you can’t,” I said, pushing him off me at the chest while stepping back, revealing my husband, who had seen the entire episode at close range. We quickly left.
Following the alleged encounter, Cuomo sent Ross an email, the contents of which read: “Now that I think of it … I am ashamed … though my hearty greeting was a function of being glad to see you. … Christian Slater got arrested for a (kind of) similar act (though borne of an alleged negative intent, unlike my own) … and as a husband I can empathize with not liking to see my wife patted as such. … So pass along my apology to your very good and noble husband … and I apologize to you as well, for even putting you in such a position. Next time, I will remember the lesson, no matter how happy I am to see you.”
This is neither an apology nor is it particularly “gallant.”
For starters, the fact Cuomo “apologizes” first to Ross’s husband and second to Ross suggests the incident, and the fact the 2005 email exists at all, would’ve gone very differently had the CNN host not been caught in the act by the victim’s spouse. The poorly written note essentially said, “Tell your husband I’m sorry I pawed at you. Oh, also, I guess I’m sorry I pawed at you.” It’s as if to say, “Please tell the person who witnessed my behavior that everything is all right and that he doesn’t need to mention this incident to anyone. As for you, yeah, sorry or whatever.”
This doesn’t smack of gallantry. This smacks of someone who is merely attempting damage control after being caught.
Further, Cuomo claims in his 2005 email, “I will remember the lesson.”
Oh, is that right? What lesson is that? Was it the lesson that told the CNN host to work quietly behind the scenes to help his older brother, disgraced former Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, plow his way through multiple allegations of sexual misconduct? Was it the lesson that told Chris Cuomo to advise his brother to discredit his accusers even after an independent state investigation concluded the former governor had, in fact, sexually harassed at least 11 women, including state employees?
In March, while fighting the allegations, Andrew Cuomo claimed he was a victim of “cancel culture.” It was a particularly stupid line, one far too stupid for the normally clever former governor. As it turns out, Chris Cuomo is the one who advised his brother to allege a shadowy “cancel culture” conspiracy.
Again, what “lesson” did the CNN host learn from the alleged incident with Ross? Was it “if you do it, make sure there are no witnesses?”
Indeed, considering the role Chris Cuomo played in trying to get his brother off the hook for serial sexual misconduct, it may be safe to assume the “gallant” apology wasn’t so “gallant” or sincere after all.
It seems Chris Cuomo didn’t really learn his lesson or regret inappropriately touching his former boss, as he himself admits in his 2005 email. It seems more he regrets getting caught. The fact his “apology” letter focuses mostly on Ross’s husband, who witnessed everything and whose presence denied Cuomo the ability to claim a he said-she said if it ever came to it, certainly seems to suggest this.
“Gallant” indeed.
