Quackery and bluster define SALT lawsuit

Published



In August, the Treasury Department issued new regulations addressing the gimmicks various states concocted to dodge a new $10,000 cap on the state and local tax deduction (pun inducingly known as SALT). Blue-state politicians such as New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy decried “[the president’s] unfair and arbitrary tax hike on working and middle class families” (just how many working-class families in New Jersey pay more than $10,000 a year in state taxes remains unclear). This rhetoric also comes with a lawsuit, which was filed in July by New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and Connecticut, and claims that capping the deduction is not simply a policy disfavorable to those state’s citizens but an unconstitutional attack on federalism itself.

While one can debate the policy merits of the cap, and the tax-reform legislation as a whole, the contention that it offends any constitutional principle whatsoever should be consigned to the dustbin of quackery and bluster.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.