Obama’s Medicare cuts, explained

Published August 16, 2012 4:00am ET



President Obama and his campaign have offered a series of defenses of the roughly $700 billion in Medicare cuts that he enacted as part of his national health care law. Briefly, they are: the cuts only deal with overpayments to private insurers and providers; the cuts do not affect benefits; the cuts extend the solvency of Medicare; and Mitt Romney’s new running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., included the cuts in his own budget. Let’s take a moment to unpack each of these.

At the outset, let me say that I don’t oppose cutting Medicare, because I believe we’re going to need to reduce spending on the program if we’re going to do something about the program’s long-term health. But if Democrats are going to attack Romney and Ryan for wanting the end the program, it’s worth at least being honest about what Obamacare actually does.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.