The Washington Post’s Ed O’Keefe has an item at the end of an online column today noting some senators who have been around a long, long, really long time:
First, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), expects to cast her 5,000th consecutive vote this week. She has never missed a vote since taking office in January 1997, and her record — if she reaches it — would place her second to Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) among current senators. Grassley has cast 6,444 consecutive votes dating to 1993. But Collins and Grassley rank far behind former senator William D. Proxmire (D-Wis.), who cast 10,252 consecutive votes between 1966 and 1988.
In another impressive feat, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), is 12 votes shy of casting his 14,000th vote. Among current senators, Leahy’s vote total ranks second to that of Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), who has cast more than 16,000 votes since 1963. The all-time Senate record-holder is the late Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.), who showed up for 18,689 votes during his five decades in the chamber.
Leahy is poised to join an elite list of 14,000-plus voters that includes only Inouye, Byrd, former senators Fritz Hollings (D-S.C.) and the late Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) and Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.).
In another impressive feat, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), is 12 votes shy of casting his 14,000th vote. Among current senators, Leahy’s vote total ranks second to that of Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), who has cast more than 16,000 votes since 1963. The all-time Senate record-holder is the late Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.), who showed up for 18,689 votes during his five decades in the chamber.
Leahy is poised to join an elite list of 14,000-plus voters that includes only Inouye, Byrd, former senators Fritz Hollings (D-S.C.) and the late Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) and Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.).
O’Keefe calls these “impressive milestones.” From a totally objective perspective, that is true. But it also goes a long way towards explaining why the Senate such a slow, hidebound institution. Did the founders really intend for it to be a lifetime tenured position for a small, elite group of politicians? Shouldn’t fresh blood be injected more often? Term limits anyone?
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
See Options
Already a member? Log in
Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.
