Supreme Court proves hostile climate for free speech case

Published November 25, 2019 4:51pm ET



The Supreme Court severely undermined free speech on Monday. It erred by refusing to hear an appeal of a defamation suit filed by a controversial climate scientist against the conservative publication National Review.

At issue was whether courts should allow the suit to reach a jury or whether instead, the magazine should enjoy what Justice Samuel Alito called “the protection afforded to journalists and others who use harsh language in criticizing opposing advocacy on one of the most important public issues of the day.” Alito dissented eloquently from the court’s refusal to review the case. Alito was absolutely right.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.