Assange indictment does not violate press freedoms

Relations between WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange and the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, which housed him, deteriorated over the past few months. Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin acolytes began to warn that any American indictment of Assange would provide future precedent for the government to go after legitimate news organizations for publishing classified information.

Just hours after U.K. police arrested Assange, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia announced that Assange faces a federal charge of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, related to Chelsea Manning’s diplomatic cables leak, not the 2016 DNC leaks.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office alleges:

On or about March 8, 2010, Assange agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on United States Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet Protocol Network, a United States government network used for classified documents and communications…The portion of the password Manning gave to Assange to crack was stored as a ‘hash value’ in a computer file that was accessible only by users with administrative-level privileges. Manning did not have administrative-level privileges, and used special software, namely a Linux operating system, to access the computer file and obtain the portion of the password provided to Assange.


As a result, Assange is charged with “knowingly” and “intentionally” accessing a computer in violation of criminal law. He faces up to five years in prison if found guilty, following his anticipated extradition to the United States.

The indictment is about as legally sound as the most ardent defenders of the Fourth Estate could hope for. Not one line of the indictment insinuates that Assange’s legal troubles stem simply from posting classified material. Rather, the whole case is based on his actively participating in computer fraud.

Journalists do not have an absolute right to post classified information, but there are protections in Supreme Court precedent, to which both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama consistently bowed. Those protections do not, however, apply to those who actually steal top secret information. If the facts stated are indeed correct, the government isn’t not even remotely violating press freedoms.

Still, the usual suspects will try to convince you otherwise.


Regardless of the personal evils of Julian Assange, no American should want the government trampling the free press to go after enemies. Thankfully, this indictment comes nowhere close to corrupting the First Amendment or legal precedent. Patriots everywhere can rest easy.

[WATCH: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange dragged out of Ecuadorian Embassy in London by police]

Related Content