Trump Close in Ohio, Pennsylvania, but Getting Thumped in Florida

A new poll of swing states finds Donald Trump running close to Hillary Clinton in Ohio and Pennsylvania, but also getting thumped in the crucial prize of Florida.

The Quinnipiac survey of registered voters shows Trump and Clinton running neck and neck in Ohio at 40 percent a piece, and Clinton edging Trump 42 to 41 percent in Pennsylvania. Florida, however, polls 47 to 39 percent in favor of Clinton.

The Sunshine State result is the biggest change since Quinnipiac’s most recent swing state poll in May, when Clinton’s lead was just 43 to 42 percent.

When Libertarian party candidate Gary Johnson and Green party candidate Jill Stein are included on the ballot, Clinton’s lead in Florida sits at 42 to 36 percent. She also leads in Ohio and Pennsylvania by 38 to 36 percent and 39 to 36 percent margins, respectively. Johnson polls between 7 and 9 percent in the three states.

Of the three major swing states, Florida “is Hillary Clinton’s best state and perhaps Donald Trump’s toughest lift,” Quinnipiac poll assistant director Peter Brown said in a release.

Florida, which famously determined the outcome of the 2000 presidential election, has a massive haul of 29 electoral votes and has been contested within a 5 percentage point margin in each of the last four general elections. Mitt Romney lost it by only a point in 2012.

Trump’s prospects there look even worse, possibly making the Rust Belt Trump’s best hope to somehow upend Clinton in the Electoral College. The demographics of voters there—more white and blue-collar than in a state like Florida—fit his pitch better, anyway. As I wrote of Pennsylvania in May, for example, a state that a Republican nominee hasn’t captured since 1988:

Pennsylvania has a few characteristics that distinguish it from other swing states this year, and they make the commonwealth resemble a microcosm of the nationwide populist phenomenon. Start with its voters’ economic outlook. A Quinnipiac poll from last week found that 38 percent of Pennsylvania voters rated the commonwealth’s economy as good and only 1 percent as excellent, compared to 58 percent who said it was “not so good” or poor. In Florida and Ohio, on the other hand, majorities say their state’s economy is good or excellent; in Ohio, Pennsylvania’s Rust Belt neighbor, the split between positive and negative opinions of the state economy is 61 to 38 percent, respectively. … There’s political discontent on top of the economic sluggishness. The approval rating of Governor Tom Wolf, a Democrat, is mired in the 30s. He has battled the Republican-controlled state House and Senate on fiscal matters, ending a nine-month budget standoff in March while still proposing a $2.7 billion tax increase for the next fiscal year’s proposal. That sounds like a familiar tale of gridlock to anyone who watches the news out of Washington, D.C. And Pennsylvanians get two doses of it.

But whatever cultural and economic factors may help boost Trump in a state like Pennsylvania, recent polling among middle-class voters in the Rust Belt don’t favor him. A Bloomberg Politics survey of likely voters making between $30,000 and $75,000 in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin showed Clinton with a 46 to 39 percent lead, as of late May.

Related Content