“The Responsible Left”

The House passed the supplemental yesterday by a vote of 226-202, with 32 Democrats voting against. Last month 51 Democrats voted against the spending, but since then the conference has added funding for the IMF and stripped out a Senate amendment that would have prevented the release of photos that allegedly show detainee abuse. We can apparently credit this achivement to the “responsible left.” I’d heard rumors it existed, but I always thought it was a myth like Big Foot or the Lochness monster:

The dynamics were striking in the Massachusetts delegation, where House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank – a nay vote in May – took a strong stand in favor of the IMF money and two other Democrats also shifted to support the president on this round. “Off the record, it’s what we call the responsible left,” said one Massachusetts lawmaker. Frank himself was scathing toward both sides, who had often mimicked one another’s arguments that the IMF money constituted a European bank bailout. “The left and the right live in parallel universes,” Frank told POLITICO. “The right listens to talk radio, the left’s on the Internet and they just reinforce one another. They have no sense of reality. … I have now one ambition: to retire before it becomes essential to tweet.”

Keep in mind, the vote last time was 368-60 — with only nine Republicans voting against. Since then, the Democrats jammed in IMF funding that probably couldn’t pass otherwise, and House liberals still threatened to vote against the bill en masse unless the Graham-Lieberman amendment on detainee photos was stripped out. This responsible left, including Frank, would have voted against funding for the troops and for the IMF if the bill had included the Graham-Lieberman language that was passed unanimously in the Senate with support from the White House, the Secretary of State, and the commanders on the ground. So how bad do you have to be for these guys to call you irresponsible?

Related Content