Least Surprising Headline of the Year

Readers may remember Charlotte Allen’s September 12, 2016, cover story on high-speed rail in the Golden State: “Bullet Train to Nowhere: The Ultimate California Boondoggle.” Allen memorably visited “a 1,600-foot viaduct spanning the Fresno River on the rural outskirts of Madera,” which was just about the only construction then taking place on a system projected to one day stretch over 500 miles. “The bullet-train project has moved more slowly—far more slowly—than its boosters anticipated,” she reported.

So we were, shall we say, unsurprised at the January 16 headline in the Los Angeles Times: “California bullet train cost surges by $2.8 billion: ‘Worst-case scenario has happened.’ ”

Reporter Ralph Vartabedian, who has done yeoman work on this beat for years, provided the details:

The estimated cost of building 119 miles of bullet train track in the Central Valley has jumped to $10.6 billion, an increase of $2.8 billion from the current budget and up from about $6 billion originally. The new calculation takes into account a number of intractable problems encountered by the state rail agency. It raises profoundly difficult questions about how the state will complete what is considered the nation’s largest infrastructure project with the existing funding sources.

If you didn’t see this coming, The Scrapbook has a railway viaduct it would like to sell you.

Related Content