Would you be more or less likely to vote for a congressional candidate in 2018 if that candidate supported expensive, inefficient, environmentally-hazardous wind farms in your community?

As a Nevada resident in a critical swing state, would you be more or less willing to vote for a congressional candidate who favors the installation of 400-foot-tall wind turbines that will block your view of the skyline, but leave the view from the candidate’s private home unobstructed?

Recommended Stories

Republicans nominate a creep for Congress

Poll finds Sen. Tammy Baldwin is underwater, but Democrats could benefit from an enthusiasm gap

Mark Meadows’ influence looms large in race to succeed Paul Ryan