Mr. President, don’t buckle on missile defense

Published July 7, 2009 4:00am ET



Based on his reaction to President Manuel Zelaya’s dismissal by the Honduran Congress, one might think that President Obama is still living in the 1980s. Along with the Organization of American States (OAS), Obama has failed to see that the greatest threat to Latin American democracy today is not rightist generals or leftist guerrillas, but rather illegal usurpation by self-aggrandizing executives like Zelaya. The now-former Honduran president tried to follow the example of his ally, Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez: Get elected, then illegally subvert established democratic institutions, and assume near-absolute power. Honduras’ constitution specifically bars a president from seeking re-election; it is punishable by loss of Honduran citizenship. Yet Obama demands Zelaya’s reinstatement, as if there has been an old-style military coup.

It would be a terrible miscalculation for Obama similarly to lose sight of contemporary issues and interests in a fog of obsolete arms-control ideology from the Soviet era. That is to say, he must not, under any circumstances, trade away our ongoing plans for a missile defense facility in Poland and the Czech Republic, a course he hinted at yesterday. Russia simply has no concession to offer that is worth the U.S. losing its ability to protect itself and its NATO allies from missile attacks launched by a mad mullah, or terrorists who gain control of nuclear weapons.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.