That is what president claimed during a speech Friday afternoon at Argonne National Laboratory just outside of Chicago. He was there to talk about a proposal for more spending on green energy projects, but got all worked up when talking about how the sequester will impact basic scientific research:
So Dr. Isaacs said these cuts will force him to stop any new project that is coming down the line. I am quoting him now, he says: This sudden halt on new starts will freeze American science in place us while the race of the world races forward and it will knock a generation of young scientists off their stride, ultimately costing billions of dollars in missed future opportunities. Essentially, because of the sequester, we are looking at two years where we don’t start new research.
The article President Obama was referring to can be found here, written by scientists Paul Alivisatos, Eric D. Isaacs, AND Thom Mason. They do make the claims that Obama attribute to them, though as recipients of the funding they are not exactly disinterested observers.
Recommended Stories
Also, while Obama claimed he opposed the cuts from the beginning and they were poorly thought-out, they were in fact first proposed by his White House and signed into law by him.
