NLRB backs employer in Facebook dispute

This just in — you cannot vow on unrestricted social media to neglect your job, trash your workplace, run up bills, and generally “raise hell” for your employers and expect to still keep your job, even if you complain about the dismissal to the federal government.

The National Labor Relations Board has ruled that an employer was within its rights to rescind offers of further employment after two workers engaged in a lengthy, profanity-laden exchange on Facebook regarding their workplace. In the tirade, the two discussed disrupting the employer’s activities in numerous ways, declaring “let’s f— it up.”

The board, the federal agency that enforces the nation’s private-sector labor laws, overruled its own general counsel in the case. The counsel had argued that former workers’ comments were not meant to be taken seriously and therefore did not justify the employer’s decision. The board disagreed, finding that the exchange was long and detailed enough that the employer had a reasonable fear that the employees would follow through.

The decision was notable because the board has usually ruled against employers who have disciplined employees for comments on social media, interpreting the National Labor Relations Acts protections for engaging in union activity to criticisms of the employer.

This case was different, the board said: “The magnitude and detail of insubordinate acts advocated in the posts reasonably gave the respondent concern that Callaghan and Moore would act on their plans, a risk a reasonable employer would refuse to take.”

The two plaintiffs in the case, Ian Callaghan and Kenya Moore, were students who had worked at the Beacon Teen Center at San Francisco’s George Washington High School during the 2011-12 school year. The two apparently did well and were sent letters by the center in May 2012 offering to hire them again the next year.

The two subsequently had a chat on Facebook about working at the center. Here is the beginning of the Aug. 12, 2012, exchange (all spelling and punctuation are copied from the original):

Moore: U gOin baCk or nO??

Callaghan: I’ll be back, but only if you and I are going to be ordering [stuff], having crazy events at the Beacon all the time. I don’t want to ask permission, I just want it to be LIVE. You down?

Moore: Im gOin to be a activity leader im not doin the t.c [“teen center,” apparently] let them figure it out and when they start loosn kids i aint helpn HAHA

Callaghan: hahaha. Sweet, now you gonna be one of us. Let them do the numbers, and we’ll take advantage, play music loud, get artists to come in and teach the kids how to graffiti up the walls and make it look cool, get some good food. I don’t feel like bein their b—- and making it all happy-friendly-middle school campy. Let’s do some cool s—, and let them figure out the money. No more Sean. [Reference to manager of center]. Let’s f— it up. I would hate to be the person takin your old job.

The center’s management spotted the exchange and later that month told Callaghan and Moore the employment offers had been rescinded. The posts had caused “great concern about you not following the directions of your managers,” the center management said.

The NLRB agreed it was a reasonable concern. “We are not presented here with brief comments that might be more easily explained away as a joke, or hyperbole divorced from any likelihood of implementation.”

Related Content