Justice Department Demands Internet Records Connected to Inauguration Protest Group

The Department of Justice is compelling a broad set of Internet records related to an organization established to coordinate anti-Trump protests during Inauguration Day, prompting a legal fight, according to multiple reports this week.

The Washington Post reported Monday that DreamHost, a Los Angeles-based web host, is fighting a DoJ warrant demanding it turn over the IP addresses of more than 1.3 million visitors to DisruptJ20.org, which was set up to help disrupt inaugural events:

“What we have is a sweeping request for every single file we have” in relation to DisruptJ20.org, said Chris Ghazarian, general counsel for DreamHost, which hosts the site. “The search warrant is not only dealing with everything in relation to the website but also tons of data about people who visited it.” The request also covers emails between the site’s organizers and people interested in attending the protests, any deleted messages and files, as well as subscriber information—such as names and addresses—and unpublished photos and blog posts that are stored in the site’s database, according to the warrant and Ghazarian.

A Washington, D.C., superior court judge issued the warrant on July 12 and served DreamHost on July 17. When DreamHost protested that the warrant was far too broad, prosecutors offered a motion to compel the company to hand over DisruptJ20 information.

“That website was used in the development, planning, advertisement and organization of a violent riot that occurred in Washington, D.C. on January 20, 2017,” the Post quotes U.S. Attorney Channing Phillips as saying. Phillips added that concern about breadth “simply is not a sufficient basis… to refuse to comply with the warrant.”

A prosecutorial motion to show cause obtained by the New York Times argues that DreamHost has no legal basis for failing to produce the requested materials.

“A search pursuant to a search warrant is presumed lawful,” the motion reads. “The Court’s search warrant in this case is no exception to these legal standards.” The Times report cited protests during the inauguration carried out by Antifa:

Mr. Trump’s inauguration in Washington was the scene of massive protests. The large majority of the thousands of protesters engaged peacefully, some carrying signs and marching and others in civil disobedience, such as participating in sit-ins to block intersections. But a smaller group of anarchists — sometimes called the “black bloc” of the so-called Antifa, or anti-fascist, movement — protested violently. Rioting by a small group of anarchists has become common at broader left-wing demonstrations for the past generation, such as during anti-free trade protests outside World Trade Organization talks in Seattle in 1999. During the Trump inauguration, such protesters broke the windows of shops and bus stop shelters, set a limousine on fire and threw rocks at police in riot gear, who fired tear gas at crowds. One masked man sucker-punched Richard Spencer, a prominent white nationalist, as he was being interviewed; a video of that assault was widely shared on the internet.

Trump singled out Tuesday what he called the “alt-left,” presumably including Antifa, for violent activity in Charlottesville last weekend. He previously had taken heat from both Democrats and Republicans for his failure to denounce the white nationalists who instigated the events there. He criticized such individuals directly for the first time on Monday.

Related Content