Tightening the Approval Process for Foreign Acquisitions

Sixteen months after a furor erupted over a bid by Dubai Ports World to manage six major US ports, the House and Senate have both approved legislation to tighten up the approval process for foreign acquisitions of U.S. companies:

The Senate passed legislation to revamp the way security threats posed by large foreign investments in U.S. companies are assessed. The bill, passed Friday on a voice vote, would overhaul the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, the panel at the center of last year’s outcry over efforts by state-owned Dubai Ports World to acquire commercial operations at six U.S. ports. The bill is intended to strengthen congressional oversight of the vetting of foreign acquisitions while making the process more transparent. The House passed similar legislation early this year, and differences between the two bills must now be worked out in a conference committee. But given the bipartisan support and relatively small differences between the two bills, lawmakers might bypass that procedure; instead, the House could pass the Senate’s version of the bill and send it to the White House for President Bush’s signature.

The bill is aimed at ensuring greater consideration for national security concerns–most notably by making the Director of National Intelligence a member of the inter-agency committee that reviews proposed takeovers. It also includes a number of other reforms–such as a provision to heighten the burden for firms from countries that don’t cooperate with the United States on counterterror and non-proliferation efforts and an increase in reporting to Congress on reviews and investigations. But while leaders in Congress wanted both to ensure that foreign acquisitions don’t threaten national security, and to be seen as ‘doing something’ to address the problems posed by deals like DPW, they were not eager to put themselves in the position of being blamed for deals that were unpopular after the fact, according to one trade insider. So this approach–which will likely be enacted into law–is an artful one that satisfies security concerns while leaving responsibility for decision-making firmly in the hands of the Executive Branch.

Related Content