Clinton Gets the Constitution Wrong on SCOTUS Appointments

Published October 20, 2016 9:17pm ET



A Supreme Court nominee must be confirmed by the Senate in order to be appointed by the president. But for months now the Republican-controlled Senate has refused to consider the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland, President Obama’s choice to fill the seat opened by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. There have been no hearings and no votes—only one-on-one meetings with some senators.

“I would hope that the Senate would do its job,” said Hillary Clinton during the debate last night, “and confirm [Garland]. That’s the way the Constitution fundamentally should operate. The president nominates and then the Senate advises and consents or not, but they go forward with the process.”

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.