Last week, a three-day conference hosted by the CIA on “homegrown radicalization” was supposed to have taken place at CIA headquarters. It did not. The conference was abruptly canceled — or, softening the blow, “postponed.” Question: Did pressure from what we might (and should) call a certain “homegrown radical” group — the Council on American Islamic Relations — make this happen?
Here is what we know.
On July 18, CAIR issued a press release headlined: “CAIR Asks CIA to Drop Islamophobic Trainer.” It revealed that CAIR national executive director Nihad Awad wrote a letter to now-former CIA Director Leon Panetta to that effect.
The rest of the release is more opaque. In referencing an NPR report that slammed one counterterrorism trainer by name, former FBI agent John Guandolo, for “allegedly smearing” an “Ohio Muslim” in a presentation, CAIR noted that an entirely different trainer, unnamed, was “scheduled to hold a similar session in August for the CIA.”
(Note: Guandolo and I are among 19 co-authors of “Shariah: The Threat to America.”)
The August CIA “session” appears to be the driver of both the CAIR release and letter asking the CIA, as the headline put it, to “Drop Islamophobic Trainer.”
On Friday, July 22, an email from the CIA informed hundreds of confirmed attendees that the whole August “radicalization” conference was off (much to the consternation of those who had already purchased nonrefundable airline tickets).
“The sponsors — in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security — have decided to delay the conference so it can include insights from, among other sources, the new National Strategy for Counterterrorism, in an updated agenda,” the email said. The goal “is to ensure that conference participants receive material that is as current and comprehensive as possible. …”
Pretty lame, even for the CIA. But it gets worse. I am hearing from multiple sources that pressure brought by CAIR, as publicly announced by CAIR, played a crucial role in the CIA decision to pull the plug on its conference.
This means, to repeat, that a “homegrown radical” group appears to be influencing what is known in the strategy world as the “information battle space” at the CIA.
The fact is, no matter how many times Bill O’Reilly plays “no-spin-zone” host to CAIR spokesmen, CAIR co-founder and national Executive Director Nihad Awad, the man who asked the CIA to drop the “Islamophobic” trainer, has been identified by the FBI as a member of Hamas, which is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.
The same goes for CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad. Both men have long been involved in what is a veritable constellation of Islamic front groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
The group’s 1991 “explanatory memorandum” called on brothers to “understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within [so] God’s religion is made victorious over all religions.”
The FBI has been following what clearly became a Muslim-Brotherhood-Hamas-CAIR (and more) nexus since 1993. (CAIR was founded in 1994 and Hamas was designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. in 1995.)
After this linkage became public record during the landmark Holy Land Foundation jihad financing trial (in which CAIR was labeled an unindicted co-conspirator), the FBI finally ended all formal contacts with CAIR in 2008.
So what’s wrong with the CIA? Congress must find out how it is that a Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas creation such as CAIR, which the FBI broke relations with, appears to influence the CIA’s information battle space.
I think Lewis Carroll already told us this story, but when he was writing the rabbit hole wasn’t such a dangerous place.
Examiner Columnist Diana West is syndicated nationally by United Media and is the author of “The Death of the Grown-Up: How America’s Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization.”
