Jim Webb, a possible pick for defense secretary, is right about this

In 2013, retiring senator Jim Webb had a message for Congress on foreign policy. Now that he is reportedly under consideration by President Trump to take Jim Mattis’s former job as defense secretary, his advice is well worth revisiting.

Writing the cover story for National Interest, Webb outlined how Congress had abdicated its powers to the executive branch. Webb is right, and the 116th Congress would do well to pay attention — especially those on the Left and the Right deeply critical of Trump, and now possibly Webb’s, foreign policy inclinations.

Webb begins his argument laying out the powers granted to Congress in the Constitution and the protections it offers against the “overreach of a single executive who might otherwise succumb to the impulsive temptation to unilaterally risk our country’s blood, treasure and international prestige.”

He goes on to outline how, largely since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Congress has changed. He explains this based on his own experiences in the military, in Congress, and with the Reagan administration.

This is not the same Congress that eventually asserted itself so strongly into the debate over the Vietnam War when I was serving on the battlefield of that war as a Marine infantry officer. It is not the Congress in which I served as a full committee counsel during the Carter administration and the early months following the election of Ronald Reagan. It is not the Congress, fiercely protective of its powers, that I dealt with regularly during the four years I spent as an assistant secretary of defense and as secretary of the navy under Reagan.


For Congress, he ends with a clear message arguing that while seeking congressional approval may well be a difficultly for the White House or a party agenda, lawmakers play an important role in safeguarding the interests of the nation.

As he explains:

The congressional “nuisance factor” is supposed to act as a valuable tool to ensure that our leaders — and especially our commander in chief — do not succumb to the emotions of the moment or the persuasions of a very few. One hopes Congress — both Republicans and Democrats — can regain the wisdom to reassert the authority that was so wisely given to it so many years ago.


Webb also has a lesson for the president: It’s better to work with Congress than alone.

From a political standpoint, it is far smarter to seek congressional approval on controversial matters of foreign policy, as was done in the October 2002 authorization to invade Iraq, than to attempt to circumvent the legislative branch. At home, Congress and the presidency will then share accountability. Abroad, the international community will know that America is united and not acting merely at the discretion of one individual.


These are not new arguments. They have been made in the pages of the Washington Examiner before.

And as the U.S. faces new challenges from potential great power conflicts with Russia or China in addition to ongoing forever wars in the Middle East, they remain critically important. Weighing the trade-offs of more boots on the ground and money poured into the military in various conflicts should fall to the representatives of the people in the legislature, not solely to the man and his advisers, in the Oval Office.

Ultimately, it falls to Congress to take back its responsibility and power, as no president is likely to just hand it over.

That does, of course, mean that the heavy weight of making decisions, some of which will likely be regarded by history as errors, will again be placed on the shoulders of lawmakers. But that is what the people elected them to do.

Whether or not Trump taps Jim Webb to serve as defense secretary, both Republicans and Democrats in Congress should take his advice to heart — especially those who think he’s wrong.

Related Content