Here’s some post-debate analysis that’ll make your head spin. Spin right off.
Donald Trump adviser Jason Miller doggedly argued Thursday afternoon that unscientific Internet surveys taken immediately after Monday’s debate were evidence that Donald Trump was the evening’s supposed “winner”.
“The polls that happened that night, the night of the debate, the snap polls, the ones that happened online, those all showed Mr. Trump winning in a [yuge] way,” Miller told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, who responded with disbelief.
“What scientific poll had Donald Trump winning? Give me one scientific poll. Everything else was—those are fan polls, man!” Todd said. “Those are polls that, like, computer programmers can mess with. Those aren’t real.”
Miller pressed on. “Those are a snapshot of what people are thinking who are actually watching the debate.”
They went back and forth and eventually laughed together.
“Jason, you’ve been doing this a while. You know those are bogus! You know these are bogus! They’re beyond non-scientific,” Todd said.
Here’s Jay Cost to back up Todd’s case:
Read the whole thing here.

