Conservative radio show host Mark Levin slammed justices on the Supreme Court after they turned down hearing cases concerning the 2020 election.
“Cowards, absolute cowards. There’s your Justice Coney, there’s your Justice Kavanaugh. You fought like hell for them, and then they spit on you,” Levin said during his Monday night program.
Among the election cases the nation’s highest court threw out on Monday was a Republican challenge of a Pennsylvania state court decision allowing ballots that were received up to three days after Election Day to be counted in November’s election.
“Your federal Constitution was changed in the last election. I don’t give a damn what the New York Times, the Washington Post … I don’t care what any of them say, I’m not even addressing fraud,” Levin added.
“I’m addressing a crooked system, systematic violations of our constitutional system. And there they are, six of the nine justices sitting on their asses doing not a damn thing about it because they’re afraid of what will be said about them in the editorial pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post.”
CLARENCE THOMAS ISSUES FORCEFUL DISSENT FROM SCOTUS DECISION NOT TO HEAR PENNSYLVANIA ELECTION CASE
The Supreme Court’s decisions resulted in Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch issuing dissents, with Thomas wondering “what the Court waits for” in regards to the Pennsylvania decision.
“We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent,” Thomas wrote on Monday.
Levin also took issue with the court denying former President Donald Trump’s bid to shield his tax returns from New York City prosecutor Cyrus Vance’s review.
“They think it’s OK for a local Democrat prosecutor to get the tax returns of a Republican president, whether he’s in office or out of office,” Levin said.
“What kind of an idiot do you have to be to not understand the precedent that that creates. Any pretext for investigating a president now by some slob out of some city or town or county … any pretext that they can pull together to make it seem like a legitimate investigation, will now be a basis for a president having to provide his tax returns. Just because Democrats in the media demand the tax returns of somebody. I open the Constitution, it’s not in there,” he said.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Trump also took issue with the ruling, calling it a “continuation of the greatest political Witch Hunt in the history of our Country.”
“So now, for more than two years, New York City has been looking at almost every transaction I’ve ever done, including seeking tax returns which were done by among the biggest and most prestigious law and accounting firms in the U.S. The Tea Party was treated far better by the IRS than Donald Trump. The Supreme Court never should have let this ‘fishing expedition’ happen, but they did,” he wrote in a statement Monday.
