Liz Warren Targets Scholar Who Disagrees With Her

Senator Elizabeth Warren is leading a charge against against the thinkers on the left, apparently. As Politico reports:

News broke at 8:30 a.m. Tuesday that the liberal Massachusetts firebrand was blasting Brookings Institution scholar Robert Litan because a mutual-fund company paid for his research criticizing an Obama administration proposal to regulate the industry. By 9:30 a.m., Litan — an economist and former adviser to President Bill Clinton — was out.

Litan resigned. Now, scholars are concerned about the effect such “McCarthyism” could have on research. 

“This is McCarthyism of the left,” said Hal Singer, a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute and co-author of the research Warren criticized. “What Warren is doing is suppressing scholars [who] speak independently through her threats.”

George Will has previously addressed the kind of pounding on the table Warren has been engaging in

“If you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. If you have neither, pound the table. This is pounding the table,” Will said. “There’s a kind of intellectual poverty now. Liberalism hasn’t had a new idea since the 1960s except Obamacare and the country doesn’t like it… So what do you do? You say anyone criticizes us is a racist.”

This is a problem that’s taking over the left. In place of new policy, the left uses empty rhetoric and feel-good populism, defending it by accusing opponents of being one of many ‘ists or engaging in one of many ‘isms. 

Free college sounds great! Except it costs hundreds of billions of dollars, and taxpayers pay for it. So it really isn’t free.

If you oppose funding Planned Parenthood, it’s because you’re sexist and Christian—never mind the abortions and the most recent graphic videos that raise ethical concerns.

No good can be had by decreasing the number of thinking people who come up with policy ideas to solve problems. New, opposing ideas create an opportunity to refine and strengthen policy ideas, in the same way that devil’s advocates strengthen one’s arguments while yes men don’t. 

That’s a lesson Warren could stand to learn.

Related Content