The opinion from the new D.C. Board of Ethics and Government Accountability was blistering: D.C. Councilman Jim Graham had “committed one or more violations of the District of Columbia code of conduct” when he tied his vote on the city’s lottery contract to a Metro development project.
But despite unanimously issuing a ruling that spent much of its 27 pages attacking Graham, the ethics board closed its investigation because of constitutional concerns that it could not punish Graham for his conduct.
Recommended Stories
Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.